Archive
Categories

U.S. Strategy for Europe: Re-education

First published as Die US-Strategie: Umerziehung Europas“ in “Korrektheiten” on February 11th, 2011, by Manfred Kleine Hartlage

Translation and Introduction: Kairos

The Jews pose a determined threat to the nations and peoples of the West. I am not being extreme or anti-Semitic, when I say so.

While translating this article I followed the discussion about Manfred Kleine-Hartlage’s response to Lawrence Auster on the Korrektheiten, Gates of Vienna and Austers View from the Right.

It is interesting to see how views of the German people are revealed that would automatically be regarded as “racism” and “hate” if proposed the other way around. A commentator posted the Latin proverb “quod licet Iovi non licet bovi” (what Jupiter may do is forbidden to the ox).

When a German would call the American (or the Turkish –or even the Jewish) people – the whole people – a “threat to the nations and peoples of the West” it would be “intolerable” and so on – my provoking first sentence is just what Auster said about the Germans. I just changed “Germans” into “Jews” and “anti-German” into “anti-Semitic.”

Some commentators denied American influence in Europe and even in the Arabic world.

Thanks to Wikileaks we got an insight into American foreign policy, and Manfred analysed this paper. In this text one can find proof of the aims of the so called NWO (new world order) that is not a conspiracy theory. As Manfred wrote on Gates of Vienna:

I think speculating about a „conspiracy“ is fruitless. I guess there are conspiracies, but most of the job is done openly. The „networks“ I refer to are well known: CFR, Atlantic bridge, Bilderberg, American Council on Germany and so on, and a lot of related institutions which don’t conceal at all what they are aiming at: You’ve just to translate their ideological phrases into plain English to see what they want. The co-ordination within this network wouldn’t work if there wasn’t an ideological basic consensus.

I think many American or British readers will reject the idea that the globalistic acteurs behind the NWO are the worst enemies to all nations, because they do not like the idea that their elites are criminals. Well, I do not like the knowledge about how criminal the cabinet of Chancellor Merkel is, either, because it is very embarrasing. But I dislike even more if one makes a fool of me as our politicians do.

And no one – particularly not Manfred Kleine- Hartlage, the author of “Das Dschihadystem”  (The Jihad System) – says that Islam was any good to us. But think about what this “religion” would look like, if we never had opened our borders for mass-immigration of muslims. Why should we even care what they do in their desert? Why do we have to secure our air traffic in a nearly maniac way? Could there be islamic terror in American and European cities, if there were no muslims who could carry out such terroristic attacs?

So, when you read this analysis, keep in mind that it is not the American people that is criticized, but the American government and several NGOs. An agenda, an ideology that will destroy all Western culture, if we do not stop it – and would destroy it even if there was no Islam at all!

Kairos-

As the author, I subscribe what Kairos says. I am well aware that most Americans neither know nor agree with what is described below as their leaders‘ strategy for Europe, and that this strategy is by no means in their interest. So when I refer to „America“ in this text, this means the ruling elites.

– Manfred Kleine-Hartlage –


Wikileaks Reveals a US Strategy for France

There still seem to be people who consider Wikileaks an overestimated enterprise of whose publications too much fuss is made. Such people could not explain up to now why the American government persecutes Wikileaks and its founder with such fervent hatred. Now, at the latest, however, everybody should know better: The publication of a strategy paper of the US embassy in Paris, including no  less than an American programme for an ideological and cultural pole reversal and forcing into line of France. This highlights the methods with which the USA subject entire countries — against the will of their people and behind the back of the public — to her ideological and power-political interest.

Up to now it was whispered only in the niches of the NWO-theorists and was dismissed by the published opinion — provided that it noticed it at all — as „a conspiracy theory“. Now that we have got a direct insight into the propaganda kitchen of the Americans, we should seize the opportunity to  evaluate the knowledge we won :

The paper is all the more informative as it comes from a subordinate office, namely from an embassy, which ordinarily does not elaborate political draughts, but implements them; and just because the author obviously does not find it necessary to explain the legitimacy of the aims and methods outlined in it towards his superiors, it is evident that he already assumes their consensus. We can assume that the strategy developed in this paper is representative for U.S. foreign policy, and that the USA pursue comparable strategies also in other countries.

In this context it is interesting, for example, that the paper deplores:

The French media remains overwhelmingly white, with only modest increases in minority representation on camera for major news broadcasts.

In Germany this nuisance resp. its removal was precisely an object of the „integration pact“ [between the Federal Government and Muslim leaders]. What a coincidence!

Interesting, however, is the implicitness with which the native French are characterised by the fact that they are „white.” For the Americans it is apparently quite natural consider this a racial issue – while the opponents of this policy, as soon as they state it, would promptly be accused of „racism“.

The paper shows that American foreign policy is designed to influence not only the current politics of its allies, but also the composition of their élites, with special emphasis on future élites. These future French élites are to be recruited and indoctrinated in a way that their ideology is compatible with that of the American élites. Whether it is compatible with that of the French people, besides, is second-rate; we will get to it. This has little to do with the usual methods of diplomatic influencing. Rather it is comparable to the attempt not to influence a person by talking to her, but by manipulating her brain.

Just the fact that this can be tried, namely without a sign of bad conscience or even awareness of a problem, shows that the idea of national sovereignty plays no role in the thinking of the American political élites. What was always valid for the much-cited „backyard“ of America, for Latin America, now also is valid for the states of Europe.

If we examine this text now with respect to aims, ideology, and methods of the American influencing, we win at least a partial answer to the question, why the peoples of Europe are obviously under the spell of a self-destructive ideology, and why this ideology is affirmed the more determined the closer we come to the centres of social power. It is not just a coincidence, but result of strategical influencing, that just the élites, whose job is traditionally the preservation and development of a community, do exactly the opposite.

Aims of the U.S. Strategy in France

The aim of this strategy is, in general, the implementation of “American aims and values”. What sounds so trivial that one would like to overlook it, actually contains explosive political implications. Such a phrase is far from being self-evident: Many Americans may not be aware of it, but the word connection “aims and values” is an American speciality. In the foreign policy think tanks of other countries one may also talk about values, as well as about aims or interests. But to pack both into one formula, is typical not only for that paper, but in general for the political language of America, and only America. Continental Europeans with their rather cynical approach to politics tend to consider this emphasis on values just a rhetorical ornament by which power-political and economic interests are decoratively disguised. (Most Europeans have been educated in a Catholic or Lutheran tradition, and the typically puritanical connection of faith and business – or “aims and values”, values and interests – is strange to us.) The self-evidence, however, with which Americans use this formula is not of the kind that expresses a trite phrase, but reflects a deeply internalized ideology.

As far as the political language of European countries refers to „values“, this happens mostly in connection with a concretion – democratic values, liberal values etc. But it would be extremely strange if the German Foreign Office spoke of “German values” and declared spreading them the aim of its policy. This is, again, a specific American feature. Whatever the mentioned values may be – and we will get on to which these are: They are expressively declared American values, which implies: One thing they are certainly not: French values.

To alienate a foreign nation from itself, its values and traditions, seems to be a legitimate aim of American foreign policy. Although the paper defines the aim as leading back the French to their own values (or rather to that what the U.S. administration regards as such), the very fact that efforts from abroad are considered necessary reveals that we are talking about re-education.

The motto is: If what is called “American values” is not universally accepted in reality, change reality! Whether the spreading “of American values” serves to promote American interests, or whether vice versa American power politics serve the spreading of these values, is as fruitless as the question whether the hen or the egg came first – in the same way it was impossible to determine for the Soviet Union  the relation of ideology and power politics by treating the one as a function of the other. It is about two components of the same politicial approach that support each other. Exactly this, internalized as a self-evident fact, is implied in the phrase “American values and interests”.

The Ideology behind the U.S. Strategy

The traditional American view of democracy is that there should be governments

deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Democracy means that the people determines by whom it is governed. However, the U.S. strategy is based upon quite a different ideology, as becomes obvious in Rivkins paper: Democracy is if all ethnic and religious minorities are represented in the ruling élites.

Not the fact that the French élites are selfrecruiting to an unusually high degree is the problem from the American point of view, at least not per se. For this there are arguable reasons: Whether one may criticise or justify it,  in all western countries „democracy“ actually consists basically in the chance to decide which one of two élite groups shall rule. It is the more remarkable what the US embassy actually does criticize:

It is no problem that access to active politics traditionally is refused to the vast majority of the French. But it is a problem that minorities are excluded, either. Implicitly, the idea of a people, consisting of free individuals with the same rights, is given up in favour of the idea of the „nation“ as an arrangement between ethnic groups; if there is not one people, but several of them in the same state, then they all must be represented. However, in this way the idea of democracy in the classical sense of the word is also abandoned. The hypocrisy of the phrase to help the French realize „France´s own egalitarian ideals“ or „of realising its respected democratic values more completely“, turns out here. It is rather about reinterpretation of concepts like „egalitarian“ and „democratic“ to something that would stand no chance to be consensus even in the USA – least of all in France; without mentioning this reinterpretation with just one syllable. Re-education.

One assumes that France is not not going to become a melting pot of the kind the USA – partly wrongfully – claim to be, but that especially muslims, but also blacks, will still reserve their loyalty in the future for their own ethnic or religious group. The access to the élite, according to the paper, should thus not depend on overcoming this attitude and identification with the French people, but is propagated as a right derived from „democracy“.

In this way, a society splitted in parts is raised to an utopian ideal and this just with the claim to prevent that France “will be a more divided country”. Newspeak.

Here, the amalgamation of the ideological with the power-political component of this strategy appears as in a textbook:

… undeniable inequities tarnish France’s global image and diminish its influence abroad. In our view, a sustained failure to increase opportunity and provide genuine political representation for its minority populations could render France a weaker, more divided country. The geopolitical consequences of France’s weakness and division will adversely affect U.S. interests, as we need strong partners in the heart of Europe to help us promote democratic values. Moreover, social exclusion has domestic consequences for France, including the alienation of some segments of the population, which can in turn adversely affect our own efforts to fight global networks of violent extremists. A thriving, inclusive French polity will help advance our interests in expanding democracy and increasing stability worldwide.

The French people must stop pursuing its own interests because the people of the Third World expect – as a reward for the acceptance “of American values” (and military bases) – the right to join without further ado every European state people without having to assimilate even culturally. What is the existence of the French people, what its rights, what its interests, compared to the uplifting view, “to spread the democracy and stability worldwide”?

One sees here how oversimplifying it would be to understand this policy only as „imperialistic“ in the narrower sense, which would imply that “the west”, or even the USA, want to rule the rest of the world; it is as much a matter of melting the European peoples (and white America) with this world and of establishing an order which allows this fusion. It is, well, about a new world order (NWO).

I’ve mentioned above what in the context of this order is to be understood by democracy. Stability means that there should be no more people which could  as a unity, capable of acting, elude this order, let alone even question it. As it is not possible to exterminate the human need to unite to groups, one shifts the formation of groups to the subnational level, turns the civil society into a society of tribes and immobilises these tribes by making their leaders profit by the fleshpots of the system. With that said we come to the methods:

 

The Methods of France’s Ethnic Change or: How to Make a Nation Commit Suicide

Tactic 1: Engage in positive discourse

First, we will focus our discourse on the issue of equal opportunity.

The same trick with which leftist ideologies always are put through. As well as the gender egalitarianism (gender mainstreaming), the systematic hermaphroditisation (dt. “Verzwitterung”) of the society is hung up on the subject of the „equal rights“ with which it has to do nothing at all in reality, a strategy of the re-education, infiltration and national disintegration is tying up to the realisation of a social utopia with the subject of „equal opportunities“.

When we give public addresses about the community of democracies, we will emphasize, among the qualities of democracy, the right to be different, protection of minority rights, the value of equal opportunity, and the importance of genuine political representation.

Propaganda to reinterpretate terms, see above.

In private meetings, we will deliberately direct questions about equal opportunity in France to high-level, non-minority French leaders. Rather than retreating from discussions involving two sacred cows in France …

Massive pressure behind closed doors so that no one gets the idea to ask where several changes, that seem to have happend on their own, come from.

…we will continue and intensify our work with French museums and educators to reform the history curriculum taught in French schools, so that it takes into account the role and perspectives of minorities in French history.

It is about manipulating concepts of history. As I wrote one year ago, this belongs to the core of the NWO agenda, “because globalism is the ideology of the ruling, and, among other things, this means that there may be no divergent concepts of history! Not only the historical facts must be indisputable, no, also the interpretation of these facts and the perspective from which one looks at them has to be the same – which, however, will not be the case as long as the nations themselves are masters of their history and its interpretation. For each of them the own concept of history is shaping her identity. History is for nations about the same thing as is memory for the individual:  the condition for understanding oneself as an individual, remaining identical with himself from birth to death.

A people which gives up its souverignity of interpretating its own history will sooner or later cease to exist. And, as I have demonstrated somewhere else, this is exactly what the NWO requires.”

At the end of this process there will be, presumably, history books like they already exist in America, books like this one:

Tactic 3: Launch aggressive youth outreach

Third, we will continue and expand our youth outreach efforts in order to communicate about our shared values with young French audiences of all socio-cultural backgrounds. Leading the charge on this effort, the Ambassador’s inter-agency Youth Outreach Initiative aims to engender a positive dynamic among French youth that leads to greater support for U.S. objectives and values.

Your values, this is the message, are not the ones of your forefathers, but the ones of America. I hope the young French remember that „Little Red Riding Hood“ is a French fairy tale, and put the question why this strange grandmother has such a big mouth, before it is too late.

To achieve these aims, we will build on the expansive Public Diplomacy programs already in place at post, and develop creative, additional means to influence the youth of France(…)We will also develop new tools to identify, learn from, and influence future French leaders. (…) We will build on existing youth networks in France, and create new ones in cyberspace, connecting France’s future leaders to each other in a forum whose values we help toshape — values of inclusion, mutual respect, and open dialogue.

A subtle brainwash of the future elites of Francem so that the mentioned “values” are implemented „on their own“.

 

Tactic 4: Encourage moderate voices

Fourth, we will encourage moderate voices of tolerance to express themselves with courage and conviction. Building on our work with two prominent websites geared toward young French-speaking Muslims — oumma.fr and saphirnews.com

I wonder whether the Muslim readers of these blogs know about with whose minions they deal with?

we will support, train, and engage media and political activists who share our values.

They really leave nothing to chance. The future globalistic propagandists are put from the outset in the start holes for their media career.

We will share in France, with faith communities and with the Ministry of the Interior, the most effective techniques for teaching tolerance currently employed in American mosques, synagogues, churches, and other religious institutions.

Does the American people know that such techniques of mass manipulation are applied to itself at home – orchestrated by the government?

We will engage directly with the Ministry of Interior to compare U.S. and French approaches to supporting minority leaders who seek moderation and mutual understanding …

The French should get a tutorial in agitprop.

… while also comparing our responses to those who seek to sow hatred and discord.

Sounds quite creepy. As this is to be coordinated with the Ministry of the Interior, it is probably about the application of state instruments of power against dissidents. In Germany one calls such “Fight against the Right”, and here also institutions of the state and established politics take part in it – in harmony with left- wing extremists who are simple-minded enough to see themselves as fighters against U.S. imperialism.

Tactic 5: Propagate best practices

Fifth, we will continue our project of sharing best practices with young leaders in all fields, including young political leaders of all moderate parties so that they have the toolkits and mentoring to move ahead.

What is done for future journalists, is done also for future politicians. Some, namely the ones loyal to the line, are supported. The others will probably physically experience the results of the American exchange of views with the French Ministry of the Interior.

We will create or support training and exchange programs that teach the enduring value of broad inclusion to schools, civil society groups, bloggers, political advisors, and local politicians.

Many thin threads give thick gallow rope.

The ambassador saves his best idea for the end: the ultimative hope,

that they [young members of minorities in France], too, can represent their country at home, and abroad, even one day at the pinnacle of French public life, as president of the Republic.

Which would document the loss of power of the native French, possibly in such the way Barack Obama’s presidency had documented the “end of the white man’s rule”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related posts:

  1. From a German Point of View: a Reply to Lawrence Auster

6 Kommentare zu „U.S. Strategy for Europe: Re-education“

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] aufmerksam geworden bin ich erst durch Kairos Übersetzung auf dem neuen Blog German Views, der Artikel deutscher Blogger ins englische übersetzt und einem […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • […] as a german blogger points out, you wouldn’t be able to utter those words — “the Germans pose a […]

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • Since it’s safe to assume that similar strategies are applied in Germany and other countries no American should be surprised that we see his country in a doubtful light.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Within the current American mythology is this idea that Israel is America’s „special friend.“

    The truth is, Israel is actually a really bad friend. They give us no real products worth remembering (maybe some weapons). They spy on us. They don’t provide troops for our wars. And their diaspora elements have a strange habit of pushing „diversity“ for the purpose of forced assimilation in every western country they live in (especially in the US).

    Now contrast this with Germany. They give us VW, Siemens, Aldis, BMW, Adidas, OUR SPACE PROGRAM! etc. I know of no incidents of spying? They provide troops to most of our wars (except Iraq, but do they do have naval and support elements in the middle east that assist the US). If I recall, a Prussian general trained the US Army before the Revolutionary War. The Germans helped America gain its independence.

    The only thing anyone can say against Germany is WWI and WWII. America choose to get into WWI. This messed up the equilibrium in Europe. This caused a more radical element to act in Germany, ergo thus the second WW. So besides this misunderstanding between our two countries, Germany is probably the best ally America has. Definitely since WWII.

    Israel…not so much. Israel is like that friend who keeps getting you into trouble just for being around them. They get into fights at bars when you’re present. They spy and talk about you to other people. They steal energy by making their issues your issues.

    Germany and the US should work to together to work on real problems.

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • DW:

    Here’s a petulant frenzy by Peter Oborne lamenting the current rise of Germany. The Anglo-American-Zionist elites are increasing their information campaign against Germany. I suspect this type of anti-German sentiment was flowing in 1911 (100 years ago) before WW1?

    In the early 1900’s, the Germans were rising in a similar manner as today; by building an economic empire( building better products). This worries the Anglo-American elites, so they use their information dissemination organs to build up fear against Germany.

    The Anglo-American elites display „chutzpah“ by taking umbrage to the increasing global influence of Germany. The Anglo-American elite literally follow a cult of global domination but they fear-monger against Germany, regardless of Germany’s peaceful rise. The Germans are pretty much pacifist, while also supporting the US and Britain in most of the major wars of the last 20 years.

    Anti-German sentiment is rising in Anglo-America (soon the evangelical churches will be warning about a German „antichrist“) Germany could be 100% run by hippies and the Anglo-American elites will still find swastikas in the tie-dye shirts.

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100098260/this-crisis-will-give-germany-the-empire-its-always-dreamed-of/

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html

  • reinigungskraft:

    The new location of the Rifkin cable:
    http://www.wikileaks.org/cable/2010/01/10PARIS58.html