Archive
Categories

Artikel-Schlagworte: „England“

Fyra teer på Tyskland och det västra

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors.Maskinöversättning. Inget ansvar för översättningsfel.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

vid Schattenkoenig

Att förbereda sig för en intervju med Carolyn Yeager fungerade Schattenkoenig ut på engelskt efter tankarna som markerar några avgörande aspekter av Tyskland (och, i allmänhet, west’sen) läge.

I. Det tyska begreppet av Geopolitik

Benämna beskriver en skissera av globala politiska strategier som centreras på den tyska reichen, och grundat i traditionen av holistic beskådar som hade dominerat tyskt tänkande efter medeltiden, då reichen (heligt romerskt välde av den Germanic nationen) hade bildat en sort av att beställa stag för nationer som underhöll deras autonomi och medborgaretecken. I den nya åldern var ett mer genetisk Viewpoint etablerat och att ge respekt till olikt bemannar‘ tecken.

Viktigast verkar till mig rota av tyska Geopolitik i ett vetenskapligt och rationally nått perspektiv av vad ges naturligt. Det funderare av bemannar som av vad de är egentligen och vad deras realistiska spänningar är, i stället för att bilda bemannar enligt någon utopianideologi som är otillräcklig för verklighet. Överheten som var segerrik över Tyskland i 1945, var tyvärr efter ideologiska begrepp och hade respekt för bemannar lite‘ naturligt villkorar. Om verklighet orsakar, beskådar deras utopian för att missa, det värre gör de det att vända ut för verklighet som ska tvingas till „ändring ”- tills alla värld ska vaket upp i ett nytt totalitärt och jordklot-spänna över sovjet – union med ingen frihet som lämnades för att tala ut fakta.

Geopolitik var fullständigt medveten av faktumet att det fanns överhet i världen som siktar på att resa upp ett sådan globalt totalitärt och konstgjort system. De tyska intellektuellerna hade fullständigt känt igen västra frisinnad kapitalism och Marxism, som två sidor av en medalj eller, i en bättre analogi, två beväpnar i en pincerrörelse med målet av att förkrossa alla nationer och att blanda dem in i ett ekonomiskt system för värld. Geopolitik var en defensiv teori mot dessa försök som företa sig av Frankrike, Storbritannien och som var mer sistnämnd, av sovjet – union.

Ideal av tyska Geo – politiken var den organiska nationen för „”, definierade som fysiskt, morally och economically sunt folk som realiserar optimalt dess givna spänningar. Medborgare som ekonomi skulle för att skyddas från beroende intresserar yttre, därför adopterades en sträva för „autarky ”. En nation, som är kompetent till jordbruksprodukter allt det, behöver och konsumerar inom deras bevakade boarders är mindre rimlig att utövas utpressning mot eller stifleds i fall att av konflikt.

Detta begrepp var redan en stark motivation, för världen kriger I, och medborgaresocialisterna tillfogade begreppet av ras- renhet för „”, som de trodde teckenet av folk och även dess politiska beslut som var determinated av dess genetik. Detta ledde också till dödliga fel, som e.g, de förväntade England att vara en naturlig bundsförvant mot Frankrike och Ryssland. De kunde inte ha varit mer ytterligare från vad därefter händde egentligen, som Britannien (och också U.S.en) fullständigt underminerades och subverted av ett hemligt, driva kapabelt av att dominera folk totalt, economically och mentalt.

Som det tyska folket var stilla i demografisk tillväxt på tiden, framkallades begreppet, och Tysklandet hade redan en kickbefolkningtäthet, begreppet av „Lebensraum ”nådd betydelse. Även verkar populariserades idén, att en mindre nation, som hade inget tillfälle att nå autarky och styrka på deras eget skulle försvinna och ge sig långt till dess mer stora grann, för att ha uppstiget från de tidigaste begreppen och endast av Hitler och medborgaresocialisterna som en sort av social darwinism av nationer. Begreppet har ingenting att göra med folkmord, eller utrota bemannar i favör av en annan, men, som det fanns en teori som länder gillar i Belgien, hade Luxembourg eller Polen inget perspektiv av existerande mycket längre, verkar det ej längre ett stort ting för att torka dem av kartlägga avsiktligt, och att underkuva deras bemannar till tysk herravälde.

Geopolitiken hade också respekt för existerande gränsar lite på grund av det naturligt villkorar av Tysklandet som har inga naturliga gränser, och därför efter att ha varit betvinga till utländska inhoppar sedan århundraden tillbaka (e.g de trettio åren‘ kriger). Den enda boarderen av intresserar var „en Volksgrenze ”, som var tillåten att utvidga och också att ge sig långt till militärt hjälpmedel, om det tyska folket utvidgade ständigt.

II. Tyskt och västra begrepp av ekonomisk vetenskap

I ett liknande långt som Geopolitik beskådar tysken på nationalekonomi var integrerad och holistic. Det hade alltid varit en konsensus, även det okända den tyska boarderen, som totalt obehärskadt marknadsför poserar ett strängt hot till frihet, och säkerhet av bemannar och kan även avslutar upp i samlas svält och folkmord. I en ekonomi som är obehärskad med hjälp av „som, det statligt ”är det skulle, spelareaktivet som siktar till någonsin mer stor, kontrollerar av marknadsföra och till någonsin mer stor vinster, och är mer vinst en skulle spelare kompetent att göra, det mer väldig och mindre samvetsöm skulle han blivet, och, som han att bry sig inte för folkets välfärd men endast hans vinst, är resultatet skulle ett stort monopol med prissätter för saker av grundläggande behov den genomsnittliga konsumenten är oförmögen att betala.

Tyska ekonomiska forskare, och även från andra européländer liksom Frankrike, Italien eller England, var medvetna att, för att ne målet av medborgarevälstånd, det måste att finnas etablerat enkontrollerad ekonomi för saker av grundläggande behov, liksom bevattnar, elektricitet, mat, kommunikationen och transport.

Om du talar till ekonomiska liberalists i dag och kommer upp med detta faktum, ska de skarpt kritisera vanligt sådan sorter av tankar att vara „marxisten ”, „socialisten ”, eller annat hårt uttrycker. De har inhalated begreppet av sammanlagd frihet av varje ekonomisk rörelse, speciellt bemannar det av och pengar. Stunder som de gör så i oder för att tysta opposition för även den kan framkalla dess tankar fullständigt, dem, kunde inte vara mer ytterligare från sanningen. I faktum marknadsför begreppet av slutsumman frihet är i honom som mycket är mer marxistisk, än det traditionella kontinentalt att närma sig till ekonomi.

Liberalism, som den dominerar vetenskapliga och politiska debatter i dag, kommer från ett fullständigt olikt skolar av tanke som har inget rotar i den traditionella teorin av medborgarenationalekonomi. De, som formulerade de nödvändiga arbetena på frisinnad ekonomi hade deras personligt att erfara inte i sätta in av arbetet eller uppläggningarbete och tillförsel för folket i ett bestämt område, men som handlade ganska i transregional handel eller i aktiemarknader. Därför är det inte en överrrakning att deras egna ekonomiskt intresserar kommer att dominera deras teoretiska byggnad. Dessa folk gjorde deras för att intressera i inga gränser för handel in i en ekonomisk „lag för central ”, även om det är ingen naturlag som lagen av gravitation men en begäran till lagstiftning.

I dag marknadsför „teorin ”av fritt, som är i faktumet som ett wonderfully unproblematic för fungerande handel globalt angår långt för att nå enorma belopp av vinst, även utmaningar att tvinga grundflödena för „fyra ”på varje singelnation. Dessa flöden är: Pengar (Investitions in och vinster ut), godor (naturresurser MÅSTE vara tillåtna ut överallt, produkter in överallt), information (att angå produktion dela upp i faktorer) och Workforce. Det sist tinget av dessa är det farligast allra, som ett fritt flöde av arbetare över det ska jordklotet rotar upp helt bemannar och tvingar dem in i ett själlöst system av exploatering och maximization av vinster. Att säkra dessa fyra flöden, betraktar den militära strategin för U.S. för att upprätta ett femte flöde: det av ”Strategical U.S. servar”, som faktiskt hjälpmedel: Kriga på varje nation som motstår genomförandet av flödena.

Var Marx kritiserar „kapitalism ”, är den alltid denna bildar av kapitalism som han beskriver. Från perspektiv av århundradeTysklandet för tidig sort 19. är detta, osannt som det fanns faktiskt hjälpmedel av att begränsa, och dämpa marknadsför vid imponera lagstiftning i favör av medborgarevälfärd. Marx‘ är det huvudsakliga argumentet: I en ekonomi, som han beskriver den, är rotationen en nödvändighet. Men, som Marx betraktar rotation en nödvändighet på något sätt, därför den inte låtna sakervänden ut bjöd egentligen för, samlas först. Därför de mest skrupelfria kapitalisterna, landskampbankirerna och marxistsna som alltid fås längs så mycket bra för jumbon 150 år. Marxists i faktum, är även bankir stormtroopers, som gör deras smutsar ner, bara nödvändigt arbete.

Det marxistiska systemet av härskar ska kommet endera långt, är det via en marxistisk rotation eller som ett krypa hot, som det är todayen. Ingen av västra liberalism nor klassisk Marxism ska bly- europé- och amerikansamhällen ut ur den pincerrörelse. Kanske kan ett övervägande av deetablerade men lång-glömda kontinentala teorierna av holistic nationalekonomi ge en utfart.

III. Kriga propaganda

Efter påstår etableringen av den stora nationen, sattes stora stås arméer upp, och för att att ge till dessa arméer en avkänning av vad de var för, påstår måste att föra propaganda på ett mer stor fjäll. Den västra överheten, speciellt Britannien, hade fått denna pekar mycket tidig sort. Britannien var drivkraften, i encirculating av den tyska reichen, som den, från nr.en 1 placerar, var rädd av någon resning för concurrent eventuellt på kontinenten. För att förbereda en kriga mot Tyskland propagandistically, grundades det „Tavistock institutet på människaförbindelse ”. Någonsin hört av den? Och den är stilla i existens, för 100 år nu. Detta institut instrumentalized ärekränkning, infamy och lies för orsaka av den demonizing Tysklandet som folk.

För att få kriga förbindelser som säljs till enkla brittiska medborgare för att finansiera Britannien, kriger mäter, ställer in institutet i deras propagandaaffischer idén av Tysklandet som siktar på att erövra den hela världen och att förslava britter. De spridning som liesna av tyskt soldatklipp behandla som ett barn av‘, räcker och att våldta belgiska nunnor, och att bearbeta stupad britt tjäna som soldat in i swinemat – även i WWI!

Det finns denna person som namnges Edward Bernays. Han var en amerikanjude, en brorson till Sigmund Freud. Som det judiskt knyter kontakt önskade Amerika för att sammanfoga styrkor med Britannien mot Tyskland, gick fungerade Bernays till Britannien och i det Tavistock institutet med målet av propagandizing unto amerikanfolket, tills de trodde kriger mot Tysklandet, som U.S.et inte gränsade till, och som poserade aldrig ett riktahot till det, var en nödvändighet. Kan dig funderare av ett mer stor agerar av treason, än få ditt hemland in i en kriga i favör av ett utländskt driva, utan det mest obetydlig intresserar för honom? Efter kriga hade avslutat, instrumentalized Bernays några av de propagandistic teknikerna för att annonsera och för offentliga aktioner, som blev bekant som PR.

Tysklandet hade ingenting till uppsättningen mot denna svekfullhet. Den försökte att framlägga fakta och figurerar om medborgareutbildning, förbrukning för krigsmakten, och beloppet av kriger ships som byggs för att göra beskyllningarna av att vara barbarisk „”, „kriga-sökande ”eller „militaristen ogiltig ”. Tyvärr är sanningen om dessa ämnen endast presentabel som numrerar, och propagandaaffischer som att framlägga numrerar, är inte mycket förment att fånga bemannar‘ synar och kommer med i pengar från kriger förbindelser. Endast som av 1917, föreställer-endast germansna som göras deras första, propagandaaffischen, visning som en soldat med uttrycker siegen för „Helft uns ”(hjälp oss segern). Den lyftte tio tider resultatet av de föregående affischerna. Tragically för Tysklandet borttappad WWI militarically, det som är borttappadt kriga propagandistically.

Och denna tragedi även upprepad i WWII, som Tysklandet hade dragit följder från propagandakatastrofen i WWI. Goebbels‘ departement för offentlig insikt och propaganda, som har därpå demonized som hade det träffande ökända lies, funnit faktiskt precis a långt av att sätta saker in i catchy rubriker för att fördriva de propagandistic bundsförvanterna förgrena sig mer djävulsk lies för spridning även över världen. Tyvärr syndar hade driva, som låg mycket mindre borttappadt igen och därefter klandrades för alla, varje stridighet driver begått. Se precis upp det känt av Ilja Ehrenburg, om du önskar att veta av vilken sort som bundsförvanterna kriger propaganda var.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Four Theses on Germany and the West

by Schattenkoenig

To prepare for an interview with Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig worked out in English the following thoughts to highlight some crucial aspects of Germany’s (and, in general, the West’s) situation.

I. The German concept of Geopolitik

The term describes an outline of global political strategies centered on the German Reich and founded in the tradition of holistic views which had dominated German thinking since the Middle Ages, when the Reich (Holy Roman Empire of Germanic Nation) had formed a kind of ordering brace for nations which maintained their autonomy and national character. In the new age, a more genetic viewpoint was established, giving respect to different peoples’ characters.

Most important seems to me the rooting of German Geopolitik in a scientific and rationally gained perspective of what is given naturally. It thinks of peoples as of what they really are and what their realistic potentials are, instead of forming peoples according to some utopian ideology which is inadequate for reality. The powers victorious over Germany in 1945 were unfortunately following ideological concepts and had little respect for peoples’ natural conditions. If reality causes their utopian views to fail, the worse they make it turn out for reality which will be forced to „change“ – until all the world will wake up in a new totalitarian and globe-spanning Soviet Union with no freedom left to speak out the facts.

Geopolitik was fully aware of the fact that there were powers in the world aiming at erecting such a global totalitarian and artificial system. The German intellectuals had fully recognized Western Liberal Capitalism and Marxism as two sides of one medal or, in a better analogy, two arms in a pincer movement with the goal of overwhelming all nations and blending them into a world economic system. Geopolitik was a defensive theory against these attempts undertaken by France, Great Britain and, later, by the Soviet Union.

The Ideal of German Geopolitics was the „organic nation“, defined as a physically, morally and economically healthy people optimally realizing its given potentials. The national economy was to be safeguarded from dependence to outward interests, therefore a strive for „autarky“ was adopted. A nation which is able to produce everything it needs and consumes within their guarded boarders is less likely to be blackmailed or stifled in case of conflict.

This concept was already a strong motivation before World War I, and the National Socialists added the concept of „racial purity“ as they believed the character of a people and even its political decisions being determinated by its genetics. This also led to fatal errors, e.g. as they expected England to be a natural ally against France and Russia. They couldn’t have been further from what then really happened, as Britain (and also the U.S.) were completely undermined and subverted by a clandestine power capable of dominating a people totally, economically and mentally.

As the German people was still in demographic growth at the time the concept was developed, and Germany already had a high population density, the concept of „Lebensraum“ gained importance. Even the idea that a smaller nation which had no opportunity to gain autarky and strength on their own was to disappear and give way to its greater neighbour seems to have risen from the earliest concepts, and was only popularized by Hitler and the National Socialists as a kind of social darwinism of nations. The concept has nothing to do with genocides or exterminating peoples in favor of another one, but as there was a theory in which countries like Belgium, Luxembourg or Poland had no perspective of existing very much longer, it seems no longer a big thing to wipe them off the map deliberately and subdue their peoples to German dominion.

The Geopolitik also had little respect for existing borders because of the natural condition of Germany having no natural boundaries and therefore having been subject to foreign intrusions for centuries (e.g. the Thirty Years’ War). The only boarder of interest was the „Volksgrenze“, which was allowed to expand, also giving way to military means, if the German people expanded continually.

II. German and Western concept of economic science

In a similar way as Geopolitik, the German view on economics was integrated and holistic. It had always been a consensus, even beyond the German boarder, that totally uncontrolled markets pose a severe threat to freedom and security of peoples and even might end up in mass starvation and genocide. In an economy uncontrolled by means of „the state“ there would be players active aiming to ever greater control of the market and to ever greater profits, and the more profit a player would be able to make, the mightier and less scrupulous he would become, and as he cares not for the people’s welfare but solely his profit, the result would be a big monopoly with prices for things of basic need the average consumer is unable to pay.

German economic scientists, and even from other European countries such as France, Italy or England, were aware that, in order to reach the goal of national prosperity, there had to be established a state-controlled economy for things of basic needs, such as water, electricity, food, communication and transport.

If you are talking to economic liberalists today and come up with this fact, they will usually denounce such kinds of thoughts to be „marxist“, „socialist“ or other harsh words. They have inhalated the concept of total freedom of every economic movement, especially that of peoples and money. While they do so in oder to silence opposition even before it can develop its thoughts completely, they couldn’t be further from the truth. In fact, the concept of total market liberty is in itself much more Marxist than the traditional continental approach to economy.

Liberalism, as it dominates scientific and political debates today, comes from a completely different school of thought which has no roots in the traditional theory of national economics. Those who formulated the essential works on liberal economy had their personal experience not in the field of working or organizing work and supply for the people in a certain area but rather dealt in transregional trade or in stock markets. Therefore it is not a surprise that their own economic interest comes to dominate their theoretical building. These people made their interest in no boundaries for trade into a central economic „law“, although it is no natural law as the Law of gravity but a demand to legislation.

Today the „theory“ of free markets, which is in fact a wonderfully unproblematic way for globally operating trade concerns to gain huge amounts of profit, even dares to force the „four fundamental flows“ upon every single nation. These flows are: Money (Investitions in and Profits out), Goods (Natural resources MUST be allowed out everywhere, Products in everywhere), Information (concerning production factors) and Workforce. The last thing of these is the most dangerous of all, as a free flow of workers across the globe will root up entire peoples and force them into a soulless system of exploitation and maximization of profits. To secure these four flows, the U.S. military strategy considers to establish a fifth flow: that of „U.S. Strategical Services“, which actually means: War on every nation resisting the implementation of the flows.

Where Marx criticizes „Capitalism“, it is always this form of capitalism he describes. From the perspective of early 19. century Germany, this is untrue as there were actual means of limiting and moderating markets by imposing legislation in favor of national welfare. Marx’ main argument is: In an economy as he describes it, revolution is a necessity. But as Marx considers revolution a necessity anyway, why not let things turn out really bad for the masses first. Therefore the most unscrupulous capitalists, the international bankers and the Marxists always got along so very good for the last 150 years. Marxists, in fact, even are the bankers’ stormtroopers which do their dirty but necessary work.

The Marxist system of rule will come either way, be it via a Marxist revolution or as a creeping menace, as it is today. Neither Western liberalism nor classical Marxism will lead European and American societies out of that pincer movement. Maybe a consideration of the long-established but long-forgotten continental theories of holistic economics may provide a way out.

III. War Propaganda

Following the establishment of great nation states, great standing armies were put up, and in order to provide to these armies a sense of what they were for, states had to conduct propaganda on a greater scale. The Western powers, especially Britain, had got this point very early. Britain was the driving force in encirculating the German Reich, as it, from the No. 1 position, was afraid of any concurrent possibly rising on the Continent. In order to prepare a war against Germany propagandistically, the „Tavistock Institute on Human Relations“ was founded. Ever heard of it? And it is still in existence, for 100 years now. This institute instrumentalized defamation, infamy and lies for the cause of demonizing Germany as a people.

In order to get war bonds sold to simple British citizens for financing Britain’s war measures, the Institute set up in their propaganda posters the idea of Germany aiming at conquering the whole world and enslaving Britons. They spread the lies of German soldiers cutting off babies’ hands, raping Belgian nuns and processing fallen British soldiers into swine food – even in WWI!

There is this person named Edward Bernays. He was an American Jew, a nephew to Sigmund Freud. As the Jewish network wanted America to join forces with Britain against Germany, Bernays went to Britain and worked in the Tavistock Institute with the goal of propagandizing unto the American People until they believed war against Germany, which the U.S. didn’t border to and which never posed a direct threat to it, was a necessity. Can you think of a greater act of treason than getting your homeland into a war in favor of a foreign power, without the slightest interest for itself? After the war had ended, Bernays instrumentalized some of the propagandistic techniques for advertising and for public campaigns, which became known as Public Relations.

Germany had nothing to set against this perfidy. It tried to present the facts and figures about national education, expenditure for the armed forces and the amount of war ships built to invalidate the accusations of being „barbaric“, „war-seeking“ or „militarist“. Unfortunately, the truth about these topics is only presentable as numbers, and propaganda posters presenting numbers are not very supposed to catch peoples’ eyes and bring in money from war bonds. Only as of 1917, the Germans made their first picture-only propaganda poster, showing a soldier with the words „Helft uns siegen“ (Help us win). It raised ten times the result of the previous posters. Tragically, before Germany lost WWI militarically, it lost the war propagandistically.

And this tragedy even repeated in WWII, as Germany had drawn consequences from the propaganda disaster in WWI. Goebbels’ Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, which has subsequently been demonized as telling infamous lies, had actually just found a way of putting things into catchy headlines while the Allies’ propagandistic branches spread even more diabolic lies over the world. Unfortunately, the power which lied much less lost again and was then blamed for all sins every fighting power had committed. Just look up the name of Ilja Ehrenburg if you want to know of what kind the Allies’ war propaganda was.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.