Archive
Categories

Artikel-Schlagworte: „Germany“

Euro Crisis: „A Flood of Inflation“

[Original title: „Prof. Markus Kerber zur Eurokrise: ‚Ein Schwall von Inflation‘„, in korrektheiten.com, January 14, 2012. Translation by MKH]

The Deutschlandfunk (DLF, a public German radio station) has aired, Friday night, an interview with Professor Markus Kerber. Kerber is an economist at the Technische Universität Berlin. He conducts research on public finance and economic policy. The occasion was the downgrading of the creditworthiness of France from AAA to AA + by the rating agency Standard & Poors. It was about the impact on the Euro. Kerber was speaking in plain language. He said among other things:

In total, Germany can try in this situation only one thing: withdraw from the Euro rescue fund – at least from the Euro rescue fund – to secure its rating and to save [herself]. Otherwise, in the near future the conclusions from Germany’s liability-causing situation will have to be drawn. Germany will have to be liable for all, and this necessarily leads to a serious downgrade. The bailout funds …

Question: That means, if I understand you correctly, that the bailout fund has now become history?

This is the beginning of the end of the bailout. Due to the liability of France, at least in the medium term the bailout fund cannot obtain financing on the terms that are necessary to fund the financially distressed countries.

Question: But is the situation so explosive, can we assume that interest rates now are going to rise dramatically in the countries that have been downgraded?

This depends on whether in these countries a radical austerity is now announced and carried out. So far we have just a declaratory policy. But even if it were announced, it would actually have to be implemented. We are in the maelstrom of a pan-European financial crisis, and Germany can escape this maelstrom only by escaping quickly from the Euro rescue fund, and by making clear that she is no longer prepared to take the liability and responsibility for the stabilization of the completely rotten states. Finally, the taboo has to be broken that the Euro zone is viable as such; Germany needs today more than ever a plan B to abruptly leave the Euro zone, together with the other trade surplus countries like the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland and Austria.

Question: You are speaking clearly as a Euro skeptic. How will the ECB, the European Central Bank …

… not a Euro skeptic, but a pro-European. Those who don’t want Europe, European integration and the European single market to be longer burdened with the religion-like Euro project, have to draw conclusions from the actual situation: conclusions that politicians are not ready to draw, because they are responsible for this policy and the current situation.

Question: But how will the ECB, the European Central Bank respond? Are you worried that they will start the printing press?

This is already under way: Mr. Draghi has, on the one hand, declared that the European Central Bank cannot run fiscal policy through bond purchases, but the ECB has, on the other hand, facilitated the security requirements for the refinancing of banks in a way that banks in the Euro area now can submit ANY paper to refinance. This is somewhat simplified, but it’s true in the trend. The result: Of the 489 billion € banks have retrieved, Italian banks alone have retrieved 116 billion. But the call to use the ECB as fiscal firefighters will even become louder, and this means, economically, exactly what you have just said: that the printing press is started, and then, after a delay, a flood of inflation will swamp us.

[Questions asked by Oliver Ramme. The interview is available on the following URL for some time: http://ondemand-mp3.dradio.de/file/dradio/2012/01/13/dlf_20120113_2315_1784255d.mp3]

Who is Delegitimizing Israel?

by Manfred Kleine-Hartlage

[Original title: „Wer delegitimiert Israel?“, July 6, 2011, in korrektheiten.com; translation by the author]

On July 11, 2011, the Jewish Forum for Democracy and against anti-Semitism organized a discussion meeting with the journalist Ulrich Sahm in Berlin. The title of the event was:

Current forms of hostility Israel: Boycott – blockade runners – mass rush to the borders – Unilateral proclamation of a palestinian State

The organizers outline the issue as follows:

„Classical“ wars are no longer fashionable. The Palestinian intifada and suicide bombings are „working“ no longer as intended. Fence, wall and other Israeli measures have an effect. Therefore, „warfare“ has been replaced by „lawfare“. The struggle against Israel is „fought“ in universities, the Internet, in the UN and in other ways on a global level. This unarmed struggle is intended to delegitimize Israel, damage its economy through boycotts, and to roll over Israel’s borders with mass rallies.

This is obviously the case. The Arab-Islamic strategy to encircle and cut off Israel from its lifelines had to remain toothless as long as only the Islamic world itself was committed to it, whereas it would become a mortal threat to Israel if Europe supported it, and indeed the Muslim infiltration strategy in Europe is aiming not least at achieving just that.

There is no effective defense against these forms of struggle against Israel. (…) For the existence of Israel and the prestige of the state even among „good friends“ and „allies“, this sophisticated propaganda war is a real danger, to which Israel is exposed almost helplessly.

This, too, is correct. The question, however, is: Why is there no defense? Why is it possible to delegitimize Israel and organize boycotts?

What is Israel doing that is considered so terrible? It maintains a powerful fighting army („Militarism“!), it is welcoming only immigrants belonging to its own people („Racism!“), has built a fence to lock out potential terrorists from its own national territory („Apartheid !“), and refuses to allow the immigration of millions of Muslims („Islamophobia“).

In short, Israel’s policy aims at preserving the political, ethnic, religious and cultural identity of the own nation, and is answered with exactly the same defamatory demagogic slogans Europeans with similar political views have to face. The principles underlying these policies are exactly the ones Europeans are expected to (and made) refuse, and which are supported by a tsunami of globalist, multiculturalist, liberal, and pacifist propaganda, re-education, and brainwashing. The result with regard to Israel is as I described it in a letter to my Israeli fellow blogger Lila:

You are rightly complaining that the Germans, and even more so other European nations, have too little understanding for your situation and give you advice whose realization would be tantamount to national suicide for Israel. Now I ask you: Our own nation is committed to a morbide policy of self-dissolution and self-destruction – how can you expect such a nation to have an understanding of another that is fighting for its existence? How can you expect a nation that is deliberately destroying the German character of Germany (and even believes this to be an expression of particularly high moral standards) to support a policy that aims at preserving the Jewish character of Israel? And why should nations who open their own countries to Muslim mass immigration agree with you when you deny the Palestinians‘ „right to return“, rather than to embrace them to play multiculti with them?

The propaganda, the boycott calls, the delegitimization strategy of the Palestinians against Israel could never work if the nations of Europe had not been trained to regard the consolidation of Western nations as something „evil“, and to abandon – for fear of the „Nazi bludgeon“ – their existential self-interest. Anyone committed to and propagating this kind of training is actively delegitimizing Israel.

Under these circumstances, it ought to be a surprise that – not only, but not least – just Jewish organizations are promoting this ideology in a particularly committed manner, and that they are using the bludgeon mentioned with particular frequency and aggressiveness against dissidents. (Let’s just remember, as one example of many, how the well-known Jewish representative Michel Friedman, like a North Korean show trial prosecutor, tried to push Thilo Sarrazin into the Nazi corner during a TV debate, just because he had rightly warned that Germany is abolishing herself. The obvious conclusion is that Friedman simply wants Germany to abolish herself.) There are a lot of major Jewish organizations actively promoting multiculturalism and mass immigration, although mass immigration in Europe means immigration of millions of Muslims, and although they cannot have an illusion that not only complete islamization, but even just the existence of merely a substantial Muslim voters block would force European governments to engage in an anti-Israeli policy and to join the boycott policy suggested by the Muslims, ultimately throttling Israel.

Maybe these people don’t deliberately intend to undermine Israel, but when in doubt they accept its destruction rather than accepting strong gentile nations. Anti-Semites tend to blame the Jews and Jewish organizations for being loyal primarily to Israel. This is obviously a false perception, and we would be better off if it was true. The emotional (and, as it seems, rather superficial) sympathy of Jews for Israel notwithstanding, most of them are by no means commited Zionists. Their sympathy for Israel seems to be limited by what they believe to be their interest as a Jewish minority in Europe and America, and, given the actual anti-White and anti-national bias of their policies, they would rather betray Israel’s interest than give up their destructive policy towards the white nations. (There is even a minority of mostly Leftist Jews actively condemning and fighting Zionism just because they entirely reject the very concept of the nation-state and don’t want their utopian globalist views to be compromised by considering the interest of any nation, and be it a Jewish one.) Whatever lip-service they spend or even true emotional ties to Israel there may be: They have made the choice not to sacrifice their petty, narrow-minded, and destructive minority strategy, but rather to sacrifice Israel. As a collateral damage, so to speak.

Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam

by Soeren Kern

[Though this article is not drawn from the German blogosphere, it provides correct information on the situation of the counterjihad movement in Germany. Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for Transatlantic Relations at the mainstream conservative Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos, Madrid.] 

German authorities have officially confirmed that they are monitoring German-language Internet websites that are critical of Muslim immigration and the Islamization of Europe.

According to Manfred Murck, director of the Hamburg branch of the German domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), his organization is studying whether German citizens who criticize Muslims and Islam on the Internet are fomenting hate and are thus criminally guilty of „breaching“ the German constitution.

The BfV’s move marks a significant setback for the exercise of free speech in Germany and comes amid a months-long smear campaign led by a triple alliance of leftwing German multicultural elites, sundry Muslim groups and members of the mainstream media, who have been relentless in their efforts to discredit the so-called counter-jihad movement (also known as the „Islamophobes“) in Germany.

Opinion polls show that growing numbers of ordinary German citizens are worried about the consequences of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged mass immigration from Muslim countries.

Germans are especially concerned about the refusal of millions of Muslim immigrants to integrate into German society, as well as the emergence of a parallel legal system in Germany based on Islamic Sharia law.

In an effort to reverse this tide of public opinion, the guardians of German multiculturalism have been working overtime to regain the initiative by accusing the critics of Islam of engaging in hate speech to try to intimidate the so-called „new right“ into silence. […]

[Read full article on stonegateinstitute.org]

Martin Lichtmesz on Germany’s Colonization

Martin Lichtmesz, one of Germany’s best political essayists (whose essays I haven’t translated until now, as his German is so brilliant that you would have to be Shakespeare to translate it in adequate English), has published a new book: „Die Verteidigung des Eigenen“, dealing with the ideology behind Germany’s self-destruction.

I want to give at least a short quotation from it: Having dealt with Frantz Fanon’s criticism of colonization and colonialism, in which the author’s the reference to  his own nègrerie („negroness“), i.e. his awareness of racial identity and its importance for freedom and self-determination plays a major role, Martin draws a parallel to the German situation, to the arrogant attitude of the West and the self-denying masochism of many Germans:

Of course, the German was, since 1945, something like the Negro of Europe, who had to be weaned from his barbarism, to incorporate him into the community of civilized nations, a task which the carriers of the „burden of liberalism“ had borne heroically, as was (and is) their job. We thank them today in Washington and Moscow for the fact that they have slain the dragon, who we once were ourselves. But the forcibly (by Versailles and Dresden) democratized Germans cannot be trusted, for you never know whether, under the cosmopolitan mask, there is still the old black jungle negroe, now simply called a Nazi, who – like once the just seemingly romanized Arminius – is just waiting for the opportunity to pull out his ax again. This provides the practical pretext to keep the nose ring always at hand. The historical consciousness of the Germans is deliberately grouped around their Negro past. The intention is not so much to make them cease to be Negroes and never return to their negroness, but rather to remind them that, due to their latent negroness, they need permanent educational supervision.

Τέσσερις διατριβές στη Γερμανία και τη δύση

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Η αυτόματη μετάφραση. Δεν φέρουμε καμία ευθύνη για μεταφραστικά λάθη.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

από Schattenkoenig

Για να προετοιμαστεί για μια συνέντευξη με τη Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig που επιλύεται στα αγγλικά τις ακόλουθες σκέψεις να δώσει έμφαση σε μερικές κρίσιμες πτυχές της κατάστασης της Γερμανίας (και, γενικά, της δύσης).

Ι. Η γερμανική έννοια Geopolitik

Ο όρος περιγράφει μια περίληψη των σφαιρικών πολιτικών στρατηγικών που κεντροθετούνται στο γερμανικό Ράιχ και που ιδρύονται στην παράδοση των ολιστικών απόψεων που είχαν εξουσιάσει τη γερμανική σκέψη από τους Μεσαίωνες, όταν διαμόρφωσε το Ράιχ (ιερή ρωμαϊκή αυτοκρατορία του γερμανικού έθνους) ένα είδος διαταγής του στηρίγματος για τα έθνη που διατήρησαν την αυτονομία και τον εθνικό χαρακτήρα τους. Στη νέα ηλικία, μια πιό γενετική άποψη καθιερώθηκε, δηαβιβάζοντας τα σέβη χαρακτήρες στους διαφορετικούς λαούς».

Ο σημαντικότερος φαίνεται σε με η ριζοβολία γερμανικού Geopolitik σε μια επιστημονική και λογικά κερδισμένη προοπτική αυτό που δίνεται φυσικά. Σκέφτεται τους λαούς από αυτό που που είναι πραγματικά και τι οι ρεαλιστικές δυνατότητές τους είναι, αντί της διαμόρφωσης των λαών σύμφωνα με κάποια ουτοπιστική ιδεολογία που είναι ανεπαρκής για την πραγματικότητα. Οι δυνάμεις νικηφορόρες πέρα από τη Γερμανία το 1945 ακολουθούσαν δυστυχώς τις ιδεολογικές έννοιες και είχαν λίγο σεβασμό φυσικοί όροι των λαών». Εάν η πραγματικότητα αναγκάσει τις ουτοπιστικές απόψεις τους για να αποτύχει, ο χειρότερος την κάνουν να βγάλει για την πραγματικότητα που θα αναγκαστεί στην αλλαγή „«- μέχρι όλο τον κόσμο ξυπνήστε νέους σε έναν ολοκληρωτικό και μια σφαίρα-μέτρηση Σοβιετική Ένωση χωρίς την ελευθερία που αφήνεται για να μιλήσει έξω τα γεγονότα.

Το Geopolitik γνώριζε πλήρως το γεγονός ότι υπήρξαν δυνάμεις στον κόσμο στοχεύοντας στη δημιουργία ενός τέτοιου σφαιρικού ολοκληρωτικού και τεχνητού συστήματος. Οι γερμανικοί διανοούμενοι είχαν αναγνωρίσει πλήρως τη δυτικούς φιλελεύθερους κεφαλαιοκρατία και το μαρξισμό ως δύο πλευρές ενός μεταλλίου ή, σε μια καλύτερη αναλογία, δύο όπλων σε μια μετακίνηση pincer με το στόχο όλα τα έθνη και τα σε ένα παγκόσμιο οικονομικό σύστημα. Το Geopolitik ήταν μια αμυντική θεωρία ενάντια σε αυτές τις προσπάθειες που αναλήφθηκαν από τη Γαλλία, Μεγάλη Βρετανία και, πιό πρόσφατος, από τη Σοβιετική Ένωση.

Το ιδανικό της γερμανικής γεωπολιτικής ήταν το „που το οργανικό έθνος «, όρισε ως τους φυσικά, ηθικά και οικονομικά υγιείς ανθρώπους που πραγματοποιούν βέλτιστα τις δεδομένες δυνατότητές του. Η εθνική οικονομία επρόκειτο να προστατευθεί από την εξάρτηση στα εξωτερικά ενδιαφέροντα, επομένως προσπαθήστε γιατί η αυτάρκεια „«υιοθετήθηκε. Ένα έθνος που είναι σε θέση να παραγάγει όλα που χρειάζεται και καταναλώνει μέσα στους φρουρημένους οικότροφούς τους είναι λιγότερο πιθανό να εκβιαστεί ή να πνιχτεί σε περίπτωση σύγκρουσης.

Αυτή η έννοια ήταν ήδη ένα ισχυρό κίνητρο πριν από τον Πρώτο Παγκόσμιο Πόλεμο, και οι εθνικοί σοσιαλιστές πρόσθεσαν την έννοια της φυλετικής αγνότητας „«δεδομένου ότι εθεώρησαν το χαρακτήρα άνθρωποι και ακόμη και οι πολιτικές αποφάσεις του που καθορίζονται από τη γενετική του. Αυτό οδήγησε επίσης στα μοιραία λάθη, π.χ. όπως ανέμειναν την Αγγλία για να είναι φυσικός σύμμαχος ενάντια στη Γαλλία και τη Ρωσία. Δεν θα μπορούσαν να είναι περαιτέρω από αυτό που έπειτα πραγματικά συνέβη, όπως η Μεγάλη Βρετανία (και επίσης οι ΗΠΑ) υπονομεύθηκαν εντελώς και υπονομεύθηκαν από μια μυστική δύναμη ικανή της εξουσίασης τους ανθρώπους συνολικά, οικονομικά και διανοητικά.

Δεδομένου ότι οι Γερμανοί ήταν ακόμα στη δημογραφική αύξηση τότε η έννοια αναπτύχθηκε, και η Γερμανία είχε ήδη μια υψηλή πυκνότητα πληθυσμών, η έννοια «κερδισμένη σημασία „Lebensraum. Ακόμη και η ιδέα ότι ένα μικρότερο έθνος που δεν είχε καμία ευκαιρία να κερδίσει την αυτάρκεια και η δύναμη από μόνη τους επρόκειτο να εξαφανιστεί και να δώσει τόπο στο μεγαλύτερο γείτονά της φαίνεται να αυξάνεται από τις πιό πρόωρες έννοιες, και διαδόθηκε μόνο από το Χίτλερ και τους εθνικούς σοσιαλιστές ως είδος κοινωνικού darwinism των εθνών. Η έννοια δεν έχει καμία σχέση με τις γενοκτονίες ή τους εξολοθρεύοντας λαούς υπέρ ενός άλλου ενός, αλλά δεδομένου ότι υπήρξε μια θεωρία στην οποία οι χώρες όπως το Βέλγιο, το Λουξεμβούργο ή την Πολωνία δεν είχαν καμία προοπτική να υπάρξουν πάρα πολύ περισσότερο, δεν φαίνεται πλέον ένα μεγάλο πράγμα για να τους σκουπίσει από το χάρτη σκόπιμα και να κατακτήσει τους λαούς τους στη γερμανική εξουσία.

Το Geopolitik είχε επίσης λίγο σεβασμό των υπαρχόντων συνόρων λόγω του φυσικού όρου της Γερμανίας που δεν έχει κανένα φυσικό όριο και επομένως που έχει υποκειεί στις ξένες παρεισφρύσεις για αιώνες (π.χ. τα τριάντα έτη» πολεμικά). Ο μόνος οικότροφος ενδιαφέροντος ήταν το „Volksgrenze «, που επιτράπηκε για να επεκταθεί, δίνοντας τόπο επίσης στα στρατιωτικά μέσα, εάν οι Γερμανοί επεκτάθηκαν συνεχώς.

ΙΙ. γερμανική και δυτική έννοια της οικονομικής επιστήμης

Με παρόμοιο τρόπο ως Geopolitik, η γερμανική άποψη σχετικά με τα οικονομικά ήταν ενσωματωμένη και ολιστική. Ήταν πάντα μια συναίνεση, ακόμη και πέρα από το γερμανικό οικότροφο, ότι οι συνολικά ανεξέλεγκτες αγορές αποτελούν αυστηρή απειλή για την ελευθερία και την ασφάλεια των λαών και ακόμη και να καταλήξουν στο μαζικούς λιμό και τη γενοκτονία. Σε μια οικονομία ανεξέλεγκτη με τη βοήθεια „το κράτος «θα υπήρχε ενεργός να στοχεύσει φορέων στον πάντα μεγαλύτερο έλεγχο της αγοράς και στα πάντα μεγαλύτερα κέρδη, και το περισσότερο κέρδος ένας φορέας θα ήταν σε θέση να κάνει, ο δυνατότερος και λιγότερο ευσυνείδητος θα γινόταν, και όπως φροντίζει όχι για την το κέρδος των ανθρώπων του ευημερία αλλά απλώς, το αποτέλεσμα θα ήταν ένα μεγάλο μονοπώλιο με τις αξίες των πραγμάτων της πρώτης ανάγκης που ο μέσος καταναλωτής είναι ανίκανος να πληρώσει.

Οι γερμανικοί οικονομικοί επιστήμονες, και ακόμη και από άλλες ευρωπαϊκές χώρες όπως η Γαλλία, η Ιταλία ή η Αγγλία, γνώρισαν ότι, προκειμένου να επιτευχθεί ο στόχος της εθνικής ευημερίας, έπρεπε να υπαρχτεί μια ελεγχόμενη από το κράτος οικονομία για τα πράγματα των πρώτων αναγκών, όπως το νερό, η ηλεκτρική ενέργεια, τα τρόφιμα, η επικοινωνία και η μεταφορά.

Εάν μιλάτε στα οικονομικά liberalists σήμερα και βρίσκετε αυτό το γεγονός, θα καταγγείλουν συνήθως τέτοια είδη σκέψεων για να είναι μαρξιστής „«, σοσιαλιστής „«ή άλλες βαριά κουβέντες. Έχουν η έννοια της συνολικής ελεύθερης κυκλοφορίας κάθε οικονομική, ειδικά αυτή των λαών και χρήματα. Ενώ κάνουν έτσι oder στην αντίθεση σιωπής ακόμη και προτού να μπορέσει να αναπτύξει τις σκέψεις του εντελώς, δεν θα μπορούσαν να είναι περαιτέρω από την αλήθεια. Στην πραγματικότητα, η έννοια της συνολικής ελευθερίας αγοράς είναι σε το πολύ περισσότερος μαρξιστής από την παραδοσιακή ηπειρωτική προσέγγιση στην οικονομία.

Ο φιλελευθερισμός, δεδομένου ότι εξουσιάζει τις επιστημονικές και πολιτικές συζητήσεις σήμερα, προέρχεται από μια απολύτως διαφορετική Σχολή Διαλογισμού που δεν έχει καμία ρίζα στην παραδοσιακή θεωρία των εθνικών οικονομικών. Εκείνοι που διατύπωσαν τις ουσιαστικές εργασίες για τη φιλελεύθερη οικονομία είχαν την προσωπική εμπειρία τους όχι στον τομέα να απασχοληθούν ή της οργάνωσης της εργασίας και τον ανεφοδιασμό για τους ανθρώπους σε μια ορισμένη περιοχή αλλά μάλλον ασχολήθηκαν με το διαπεριφερειακό εμπόριο ή στα χρηματιστήρια. Επομένως δεν είναι μια έκπληξη ότι το οικονομικό συμφέρον τους έρχεται να εξουσιάσει το θεωρητικό κτήριό τους. Αυτοί οι άνθρωποι έκαναν το ενδιαφέρον τους για κανένα όριο για το εμπόριο σε έναν κεντρικό οικονομικό νόμο „«, αν και δεν είναι κανένας φυσικός νόμος ως νόμος της βαρύτητας αλλά μια απαίτηση στη νομοθεσία.

Σήμερα η θεωρία „«των ελεύθερων αγορών, που είναι στην πραγματικότητα ένας θαυμάσια απρόσκοπτος τρόπος για το συνολικά λειτουργούν εμπόριο έχει σχέση για να κερδίσει τα τεράστια ποσά του κέρδους, τολμά ακόμη και να αναγκάσει το „τέσσερα θεμελιώδεις ροές «επάνω σε κάθε ενιαίο έθνος. Αυτές οι ροές είναι: Χρήματα (Investitions μέσα και κέρδη έξω), αγαθά (οι φυσικοί πόροι ΠΡΕΠΕΙ να επιτραπούν έξω παντού, προϊόντα παντού), πληροφορίες (σχετικά με τους παράγοντες παραγωγής) και εργατικό δυναμικό. Το τελευταίο πράγμα αυτοί είναι το πιό επικίνδυνο όλοι, δεδομένου ότι μια ελεύθερη ροή των εργαζομένων σε όλη την υδρόγειο θα φυτεψει επάνω τους ολόκληρους λαούς και θα τους αναγκάσει σε ένα άψυχο σύστημα της εκμετάλλευσης και της μεγιστοποίησης των κερδών. Για να εξασφαλίσει αυτές τις τέσσερις ροές, η ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΗ στρατιωτική στρατηγική θεωρεί για να καθιερωθεί μια πέμπτη ροή: αυτή των «ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΩΝ στρατηγικών υπηρεσιών», το οποίο σημαίνει πραγματικά: Πόλεμος σε κάθε έθνος που αντιστέκεται στην εφαρμογή των ροών.

Όπου Marx επικρίνει την κεφαλαιοκρατία „«, είναι πάντα αυτή η μορφή κεφαλαιοκρατίας που περιγράφει. Από την προοπτική του πρόωρου 19. αιώνα Γερμανία, αυτό είναι αναληθές δεδομένου ότι υπήρξαν πραγματικά μέσα και τις αγορές με την επιβολή της νομοθεσίας υπέρ της εθνικής ευημερίας. Κύριο επιχείρημα Marx το» είναι: Σε μια οικονομία δεδομένου ότι την περιγράφει, η επανάσταση είναι μια ανάγκη. Αλλά δεδομένου ότι Marx θεωρεί την επανάσταση μια ανάγκη οπωσδήποτε, γιατί να μην αφήσει τα πράγματα να βγάλουν πραγματικά κακό για τις μάζες πρώτα. Επομένως οι πιό αδίστακτοι κεφαλαιοκράτες, οι διεθνείς τραπεζίτες και οι μαρξιστές πήραν πάντα κατά μήκος τόσο πολύ καλού για τα τελευταία 150 έτη. Οι μαρξιστές, στην πραγματικότητα, είναι ακόμη και stormtroopers οι τραπεζίτες» που κάνουν τη βρώμικη αλλά απαραίτητη εργασία τους.

Το μαρξιστικό σύστημα του κανόνα θα έρθει είτε τρόπος, είτε μέσω μιας μαρξιστικής επανάστασης είτε ως σερνμένος απειλή, δεδομένου ότι είναι σήμερα. Ούτε ο δυτικός φιλελευθερισμός ούτε ο κλασσικός μαρξισμός δεν θα οδηγήσει τις ευρωπαϊκές και αμερικανικές κοινωνίες από εκείνη την pincer μετακίνηση. Ίσως μια εκτίμηση των από παλιά καθιερωμένων αλλά μακρύς-ξεχασμένων ηπειρωτικών θεωριών των ολιστικών οικονομικών μπορεί να παρέχει μια έξοδο.

ΙΙΙ. πολεμική προπαγάνδα

Μετά από την καθιέρωση των μεγάλων εθνών, οι μεγάλοι μόνιμοι στρατοί τέθηκαν επάνω, και προκειμένου να παρέχουν σε αυτούς τους στρατούς μια αίσθηση αυτό που που ήταν για, τα κράτη έπρεπε να διευθύνουν την προπαγάνδα σε μια μεγαλύτερη κλίμακα. Οι Δυτικές δυνάμεις, ειδικά Μεγάλη Βρετανία, είχαν αυτό το σημείο πολύ νωρίς. Η Μεγάλη Βρετανία ήταν η κινητήρια δύναμη το γερμανικό Ράιχ, δεδομένου ότι, από τη Νο 1 θέση, φοβήθηκε οποιαδήποτε ταυτόχρονη ενδεχομένως αύξηση στην ήπειρο. Προκειμένου να προετοιμαστεί ένας πόλεμος ενάντια στη Γερμανία propagandistically, το ίδρυμα „Tavistock στις ανθρώπινες σχέσεις «ιδρύθηκε. Πάντα ακουσμένος για το; Και είναι ακόμα, για 100 έτη τώρα. Αυτό το ίδρυμα η δυσφήμηση, infamy και βρίσκεται για την αιτία να δαιμονοποιήσει τη Γερμανία ως άνθρωποι.

Προκειμένου να αποκτηθεί ο πόλεμος οι δεσμοί πώλησαν στους απλούς βρετανικούς πολίτες για τα πολεμικά μέτρα της χρηματοδοτώντας Μεγάλης Βρετανίας, η οργάνωση ιδρύματος στις αφίσες προπαγάνδας τους η ιδέα της Γερμανίας που στοχεύει στην κατάκτηση ολόκληρου του κόσμου και την υποδούλωση των Βρετανών. Διαδίδουν τα ψέματα των γερμανικών στρατιωτών χέρια που κόβουν των μωρών», που βιάζουν τις βελγικές καλόγριες και που επεξεργάζονται τους περιερχόμενους βρετανικούς στρατιώτες στα τρόφιμα χοίρων – ακόμη και σε WWI!

Υπάρχει αυτό το πρόσωπο που ονομάζεται το Edward Bernays. Ήταν αμερικανικός Εβραίος, ένας ανηψιός σε Sigmund Freud. Δεδομένου ότι το εβραϊκό δίκτυο θέλησε την Αμερική για να ενώσει τις δυνάμεις με τη Μεγάλη Βρετανία ενάντια στη Γερμανία, Bernays πήγε στη Μεγάλη Βρετανία και ελειτούργησε στο ίδρυμα Tavistock με το στόχο του unto τους αμερικανικούς ανθρώπους έως ότου εθεώρησαν τον πόλεμο ενάντια στη Γερμανία, στην οποία οι ΗΠΑ δεν οριοθέτησαν και που δεν αποτέλησε ποτέ άμεση απειλή για τις, ήταν μια ανάγκη. Μπορείτε να σκεφτείτε μια μεγαλύτερη πράξη της προδοσίας από παίρνοντας την πατρίδα σας σε έναν πόλεμο υπέρ μιας ξένης δύναμης, χωρίς το μικρότερο ενδιαφέρον για το; Αφότου είχε τελειώσει ο πόλεμος, Bernays μερικές από τις propagandistic τεχνικές για και για τις δημόσιες εκστρατείες, οι οποίες έγιναν γνωστές ως δημόσιες σχέσεις.

Η Γερμανία δεν είχε τίποτα που θέτει ενάντια σε αυτήν την προδοσία. Προσπάθησε να παρουσιάσει τα γεγονότα και τους αριθμούς για την εθνική παιδεία, τις δαπάνες για τις οπλισμένες δυνάμεις και το ποσό πολεμικών σκαφών που ναυπηγήθηκαν για να ακυρώσουν τις κατηγορίες της ύπαρξης „βαρβαρικό «, την πόλεμος-επιδίωξη „«ή το μιλιταριστή „«. Δυστυχώς, η αλήθεια για αυτά τα θέματα είναι μόνο ευπαρουσίαστη ως αριθμούς, και οι αφίσες προπαγάνδας που παρουσιάζουν τους αριθμούς δεν είναι πολύ υποτιθέμενες για μάτια να πιάσουν των λαών» και να φέρουν στα χρήματα από τους πολεμικούς δεσμούς. Μόνο από το 1917, οι Γερμανοί έκαναν την πρώτη εικόνα-μόνο αφίσα προπαγάνδας τους, που παρουσιάζει έναν στρατιώτη με το siegen Helft λέξεων „uns «(μας βοηθήστε να κερδίσουμε). Αύξησε δέκα φορές το αποτέλεσμα των προηγούμενων αφισών. Τραγικά, πριν από χαμένο η Γερμανία WWI militarically, έχασε τον πόλεμο propagandistically.

Και αυτή η τραγωδία επαναλαμβανόμενη ακόμη και WWII, δεδομένου ότι η Γερμανία είχε σύρει τις συνέπειες από την καταστροφή προπαγάνδας σε WWI. Υπουργείο Goebbels το» του δημόσιων Διαφωτισμού και της προπαγάνδας, που έχει δαιμονοποιήσει στη συνέχεια όπως κακόφημα ψέματα αφήγησης, πραγματικά ακριβώς είχε βρεί έναν τρόπο τα πράγματα στους ελκυστικούς τίτλους ενώ οι propagandistic κλάδοι των συμμάχων» διέδωσαν τα πιό διαβολικά ψέματα πέρα από τον κόσμο. Δυστυχώς, η δύναμη που είπε ψέματα πολύ λιγότερο έχασε πάλι και κατηγορήθηκε έπειτα για όλες τις αμαρτίες που κάθε δύναμη πάλης είχε δεσμεύσει. Ακριβώς ανατρέξτε το όνομα Ilja Ehrenburg εάν θέλετε να ξέρετε ποιου είδους πολεμική προπαγάνδα των συμμάχων η» ήταν.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

ドイツおよび西の4つの説

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. 機械翻訳。翻訳の誤りに対しても責任を負いません。]
Comments in English, please. View original article

Schattenkoenig著

Carolyn Yeagerとのインタビューのために準備するためには、Schattenkoenigは英語でドイツ(および、一般に、西)状態のある重大な面を強調する次の思考を解決しました。

I。 Geopolitikのドイツの概念

言葉は中世以来ドイツに考えることを支配した全体眺めの伝統でドイツ国(ドイツの国家の神聖ローマ帝国)が一種の自主性および国民性を維持した国家のための命令の支柱を形作ったときに、ドイツのドイツ国に集中し、創設される全体的な政治作戦の輪郭を記述します。 新しい年齢では、異なった人々のへの点を」与える遺伝の視点は特性確立されました。

最も重要な自然に与えられるものがの科学的で、合理的に得られた見通しのドイツ語Geopolitikの定着は私にようです。 それは人々について現実のために不十分であるユートピア的なイデオロギーに従って人々を形作るかわりにそれらがであり、実際にもの現実的な潜在性がであるもの現在の考えます。 不運にも1945のドイツに勝利力はイデオロギーの概念を次、人々ののための少し点が」自然な状態ありました。 現実によりユートピア的な眺めが失敗すればひどく„の変更に事実をはっきり言うために残っている自由無しで新しい全体主義および地球及ぶソビエト連邦で-すべての世界まで…それを目覚めれば強制されれば「現実のためにならせる。

Geopolitikは目指す世界に力があったという事実を十分に把握して非常に全体的な全体主義および人工的なシステムを建てます。 ドイツの知識人はすべての国家を圧倒し、世界経済システムに混ぜることの目的の挟み撃ち作戦のよりよい類似、2本の腕の双方として十分に西部の寛大な資本主義およびマルクス主義をの1個のメダルまたは、確認しました。 Geopolitikはあとでフランス、イギリスとソビエト連邦によって引き受けられたこれらの試みに対して防御的な理論でした。

ドイツの地理政治学の理想は„の有機性国家「で、と最上にある特定の潜在性を実現している物理的、道徳的そして経済的に健康な人々を定義しました。 国民経済は依存から外へ向かう興味に保護されるべきでした従って„の自給自足のための努力は「採用されました。 すべてを作り出せるそれ国家は守られた寄宿生の内で対立の場合にはゆすられるか、または窒息してまずないです必要とし、消費します。

この概念は第1次世界大戦の前に既に強い刺激であり、遺伝学によってdeterminated人々および政治決定の特性を信じたと同時に国民の社会主義者は„の人種的な純度の概念を「加えました。 これはまた重大エラーの例えば原因となりました彼らがイギリスがフランスおよびロシアに対して自然な同盟国であると期待したと同時に。 それらは英本国(およびまた米国人々を全く、経済的そして精神的に支配することができる秘蜜力によって)完全に下を掘られ、覆されたのでにちがいないそれから実際に何が起こったかからそれ以上。

ドイツの人々が人口統計学の成長にその時にまだあったと同時に概念は開発され、ドイツに既に高い人口密度、„のLebensraumのの概念が「得られた重要性ありました。 自給自足および強さを自分自身で得る機会がなかったより小さい国家がすばらしい隣人へ消え、くずれることだったという考えは最も早い概念から上がるようでヒトラーおよび国民の社会主義者によってだけ一種の国家の社会進化論として大衆化されました。 概念は集団虐殺とは全くまたは人々もう1つを支持して根絶の関係ありませんが、国がベルギーを好む理論があったので、ルクセンブルクにかポーランドは非常により長く存在の見通しがありませんでした、それはそれらを地図を離れて慎重に拭き、ドイツの支配権に人々を抑制するもはや大きい事のようではないです。

Geopolitikにまた固有の境界を持っていないそして従って外国の侵入に応じて何世紀にもわたってあるドイツの自然な状態のために既存のボーダーのための少し点がありました(戦争例えば30年の」)。 興味の唯一の寄宿生はドイツの人々が絶えず拡大したら、拡大する„Volksgrenzeが「、で軍の平均にまたくずれます。

II.経済学のドイツおよび西部の概念

Geopolitikとして同じような方法では、経済学のドイツの意見は統合され、全体でした。 それは全く自由な市場が人々の自由そして保証への厳しい脅威を与え、多くの飢餓および集団虐殺に行きつくかもしれませんこと、ドイツの寄宿生を越える一致、いままで常にでした。 „によって自由な経済では州は「そこに市場のより大きい制御とより大きい利益へのプレーヤーの活動的な見当であり、より多くの利益はプレーヤー作れましたより強大のおよびより少なく良心的彼は、および彼が人々の福祉もっぱら彼のをない利益気遣うが、ように、結果です一般の消費者によってが支払ってない基本的ニーズの事のための価格の大きい独占なります。

フランスのような他の欧州諸国からのドイツの経済的な科学者は、イタリアかイギリス、国民の繁栄の目的に達するために、そこに水、電気、食糧、コミュニケーションおよび輸送のような基本的ニーズの事のための集産主義的な経済、確立されなければならなかったことわかってい。

経済的なliberalistsに今日話して、この事実を思い付けば、彼らは通常„の「社会主義マルクス主義者「、„または他の乱暴な言葉であるためにそのような種類の思考を公然と非難します。 彼らはあらゆる経済的な動きの総自由、人々の特に自由およびお金の概念をinhalated。 思考を完全に開発できる前でさえも反対を沈黙させるために彼らがオーデルでそうする間、真実からそれ以上であることができませんでした。 実際は、総市場の自由の概念はそれ自体経済に従来の大陸アプローチより大いにマルクス主義です。

科学的なおよび政治討論を今日支配すると同時に、自由主義は国民の経済学の従来の理論で根がない全く異なる学派から来ます。 人々のための働くか、または組織の仕事そして供給の分野で寛大な経済の必要な仕事を持っていた個人的な経験をないある特定の区域の作り出したむしろ対処される地区に跨る貿易または株式市場で人。 従ってそれは自身の経済的利益が理論的な建物を支配することを来るという驚きではないです。 これらの人々は中央経済的な„の法律にそれが立法へ重力の法則しかし要求として自然法ではないが、貿易のための境界の彼らの興味を「作りませんでした。

今日実際は莫大な量の利益を得るために全体的に貿易心配を作動させるためのすばらしくunproblematic方法であるフリーマーケットの„理論は「ひとつひとつの国家に„4の基本的な流れ「を強制することを敢えてします。 これらの流れは次のとおりです: お金(Investitionsおよび利益)、商品(天然資源は、プロダクトどこでもどこでも許可されなければなりません)、情報(生産要素に関して)および労働力。 これらの最後の事は地球を渡る労働者の自由な流れが全体の人々の上で定着し、開発の無情なシステムおよび利益の最大化にそれらを強制するので、すべての最も危ないです。 この4つの流れを確保するためには、米国の防衛戦略は第5流れを確立すると考慮します: 実際に平均「米国戦略的なサービス」ののそれ、: 流れの実施に抵抗するあらゆる国家の戦争。

マルクスが„の資本主義を「批判する一方、それは彼が記述する資本主義のこの形態常にです。 早い19。世紀の観点から市場を限り、緩和する実際の方法虚偽行った国民の福祉を支持して印象的な立法によってドイツのこれです。 マルクスの」主要な議論は次のとおりです: 経済では彼がそれを記述するので、回転は必要です。 しかしマルクスが回転を必要ととにかく考慮するので、なぜ許可されなかった事が固まりのための実際に悪い最初にひっくり返す。 従って最後の150年の間そう非常によいに沿って常に得られる最も不謹慎な資本家、国際的な銀行家およびマルクス主義者。 実際はマルクス主義者は彼らの汚れた必要な仕事をする銀行家の」突撃隊員です。

規則のマルクス主義システムはいずれにしても、またははう脅迫としてマルクス主義の回転によってならばそれが今日であるので、来ます。 西部の自由主義も古典的なマルクス主義もその挟み撃ち作戦からヨーロッパおよびアメリカの社会を導きません。 全体経済学の長い伝統があるしかし忘れ去られた大陸理論の多分考察は出口を提供するかもしれません。

III.戦争の宣伝

大きい国民国家の確立の後で、すばらしい常備軍は設置され、これらの軍隊に提供するためにだったものののため感覚を、状態はより大きいスケールの宣伝を行なわなければなりませんでした。 西側主要国、特に英本国は、このポイントを非常に早く持っていました。 英本国は、第1位置から、多分大陸に上がる並行操作を恐れていたので、ドイツのドイツ国をencirculatingの原動力でした。 人間関係のドイツに対して戦争をプロパガンダによって準備するためには、„のTavistockの協会は「創設されました。 それ聞かれるか。 そしてそれは100年間存在に、今まだあります。 この協会は人々としてドイツの悪魔化の原因のための名誉毀損、不名誉およびうそをinstrumentalized。

戦時公債を得ることは英本国の戦争の手段、宣伝ポスターでセットアップされた協会を融資するために簡単なイギリスの市民に目指す全世界を征服し、ブリトン人を奴隷にするドイツの考え販売しました。 彼らは赤ん坊」手断ち切り、ベルギーの尼僧を強姦し、そしてWWIのブタの食糧に落とされたイギリスの兵士を-処理しているドイツの兵士のうそを広げました!

エドワードBernaysと名前を挙げられるこの人があります。 彼はアメリカのユダヤ人、ジークムント・フロイトへの甥でした。 ユダヤ人ネットワークがアメリカにドイツに対して英本国と力を合わせてほしかったのでBernaysは英本国に行き、アメリカの人々に宣伝の目的のTavistockの協会で米国が接しなかった決してそれへの直接脅威を与えなかったし、ドイツに対して戦争を信じたまで、でした必要はたらきました。 ことができまあなたの故国を、それ自身のための最もわずかな興味なしで外国力を支持して戦争に得ますより反逆の大きい行為について考えるか。 戦争が終わった後、Bernaysは広告とPR活動として知られるようになった一般向けキャンペーンのためのプロパガンダの技術のいくつかをinstrumentalized。

ドイツにこの背信に対して置くことを何もありませんでした。 「粗野な「戦争を求める„„または„の軍国主義者「であることの告発を無効にすることを武力のための国民教育、支出および造られた戦争船の量についての事実そして図を示すことを試みました。 残念ながら、これらのトピックについての真実は数としてだけりっぱであり、数を示す宣伝ポスターは人々の」目つかまえ、戦時公債からのお金を持って来て非常に想定されていません。 1917年現在にだけ、ドイツ人は単語の„のHelftのunsのsiegenの兵士を「示す彼らの最初映像だけ宣伝ポスターを作りました(私達を勝利助けて下さい)。 それは前のポスターの結果を10倍の上げました。 ドイツはWWIをmilitarically失った前に悲劇的に、戦争をプロパガンダによって失いました。

そしてドイツがWWIの宣伝の災害から結果を引いたようにWWIIで繰り返されるこの悲劇。 Goebbelsの同盟国」のプロパガンダの枝が世界上のさらにもっとひどいうそを広げる間」、評判が悪いうそを言うこととして続いて悪魔化された公共の啓発および宣伝のための大臣実際にちょうど人の心を捕える見出しに事を入れる方法を見つけました。 残念ながら、大いにより少なく再度失われてあり、すべての罪をあらゆる戦い力責任にされた力は託しました。 どんな種類の知り同盟国」戦争の宣伝がだったかたいと思ったらちょうどIlja Ehrenburgの名前を調べて下さい。

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Quattro tesi sulla Germania e sull’ovest

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Traduzione automatica. Nessuna responsabilità per errori di traduzione.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

da Schattenkoenig

Per preparare per un’intervista con Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig ha risolto in inglese i seguenti pensieri per evidenziare alcuni aspetti cruciali della situazione della Germania (e, generalmente l’ovest).

I. Il concetto tedesco di Geopolitik

Il termine descrive un profilo delle strategie politiche globali concentrate sulla Reich tedesca e fondate nella tradizione delle viste olistiche che avevano dominato il pensiero tedesco dai medio evo, quando la Reich (sacro romano impero della nazione germanica) aveva formato un genere di gancio d’ordinazione per le nazioni che hanno mantenuto la loro autonomia e carattere nazionale. Nella nuova età, un punto di vista più genetico è stato stabilito, dante il rispetto caratteri alla gente differente‘.

Più importante sembra a me piantarsi del tedesco Geopolitik in una prospettiva scientifica e razionale guadagnata di che cosa è dato naturalmente. Pensa alla gente a partire da cui realmente sono e da cui i loro potenziali realistici sono, invece di formazione della gente secondo una certa ideologia utopistica che è insufficiente per la realtà. I poteri vittoriosi sopra la Germania nel 1945 purtroppo stavano seguendo i concetti ideologici ed hanno avuti poco rispetto per stati naturali della gente‘. Se la realtà induce i loro punti di vista utopistici a venire a mancare, peggio lo fanno risultare per la realtà che saranno forzati al cambiamento del „“- fino a tutto il mondo sveglieranno in nuova Unione Sovietica totalitaria e dimisurazione senza libertà lasciata per parlare fuori i fatti.

Geopolitik era ben consapevole del fatto che c’erano poteri nel mondo che punta erigendo così sistema totalitario ed artificiale globale. Gli intellettuali tedeschi completamente avevano riconosciuto il capitalismo ed il marxismo liberali occidentali come due lati di una medaglia o, in di migliore analogia, di due armi in un movimento di tenaglia con lo scopo di sopraffare tutte le nazioni e di mescolamento loro in un sistema economico del mondo. Geopolitik era una teoria difensiva contro questi tentativi intrapresi dalla Francia, Gran Bretagna e, successivamente, dall‘Unione Sovietica.

L’ideale di geopolitica tedesca era la nazione organica del „“, ha definito come la gente fisicamente, morale ed economicamente in buona salute che realizza ottimamente i suoi potenziali dati. L’economia nazionale doveva essere salvaguardata da dipendenza agli interessi esterni, quindi un tentare d’ottenere l’autarchia del „“è stato adottato. Una nazione che può produrre tutto ha bisogno di e consuma presso i loro pensionanti custodetti è meno probabile essere ricattata o soffocata nel caso del conflitto.

Questo concetto era già una forte motivazione prima della prima guerra mondiale ed i nazionalsocialisti hanno aggiunto il concetto della purezza razziale del „“mentre hanno creduto il carattere di una gente e perfino delle sue decisioni politiche che sono determinated dalla sua genetica. Ciò inoltre ha condotto agli errori mortali, per esempio mentre hanno invitare l’Inghilterra ad essere un alleato naturale contro la Francia e la Russia. Non potrebbero essere ulteriori da che cosa poi realmente è accaduto, poichè la Gran-Bretagna (ed anche gli Stati Uniti) completamente sono stati insidiati e sovvertito stati da un potere clandestino capace della dominazione della gente completamente, economicamente e mentalmente.

Mentre la gente tedesca era ancora allora nella crescita demografica il concetto è stato sviluppato e la Germania già ha avuta un’alta densità demografica, il concetto importanza assunta di Lebensraum del „“. Anche l’idea che una più piccola nazione che non ha avuta opportunità di guadagnare l’autarchia e la forza da sè era di scomparire e condurre al suo maggior vicino sembra aumentare dai concetti più iniziali e soltanto è stata diffusa da Hitler e dai nazionalsocialisti come genere di darwinismo sociale delle nazioni. Il concetto ha niente a che fare con i genocidi o la gente di sterminio a favore di altra, ma poichè c’era una teoria in cui i paesi gradiscono il Belgio, il Lussemburgo o la Polonia non ha avuta prospettiva di esistenza molto più lungamente, non sembra più una grande cosa per pulirle deliberatamente fuori dalla mappa e per sottomettere la loro gente a dominio tedesco.

Il Geopolitik inoltre ha avuto poco rispetto per i confini attuali a causa dello stato naturale della Germania che non ha frontiere naturali e quindi che è conforme alle intrusioni straniere per secoli (per esempio i trenta anni‘ di guerra). Il solo pensionante di interesse era il „Volksgrenze “, che è stato permesso espandersi, anche conducendo ai mezzi militari, se la gente tedesca si espandesse continuamente.

II. Concetto tedesco ed occidentale di scienza economica

In un simile modo come Geopolitik, la vista tedesca sull’economia era integrata ed olistica. Era stato sempre un consenso, anche oltre il pensionante tedesco, che i mercati completamente incontrollati posano una minaccia severa contro libertà e sicurezza della gente e perfino potrebbero finire nell’inedia di massa e nel genocidio. In un’economia incontrollata per mezzo di „lo stato “là sarebbe attivo dei giocatori che tende al controllo mai maggior del mercato ed ai profitti mai maggiori e più il profitto un giocatore potrebbe fare, il più vigoroso e meno scrupoloso diventerebbe e come si preoccupa non per il benessere ma solamente suo della gente profitto, il risultato sarebbe un grande monopolio con i prezzi per le cose di bisogno fondamentale che il consumatore medio non può pagare.

Gli scienziati economici tedeschi e perfino da altri paesi europei quale la Francia, l’Italia o l’Inghilterra, erano informati che, per raggiungere lo scopo della prosperità nazionale, là ha dovuto essere stabilito un’economia controllata dallo stato per le cose dei bisogni fondamentali, quali l’acqua, l’elettricità, l’alimento, la comunicazione ed il trasporto.

Se state parlando oggi con liberalists economici e fornite questo fatto, denunceranno solitamente tali generi di pensieri per essere marxista del „“, „socialista “o altre parole dure. Inhalated il concetto di libertà totale di ogni movimento economico, particolarmente quella della gente e di soldi. Mentre agiscono in tal modo in oder per fare tacere l’opposizione anche prima che possa sviluppare i suoi pensieri completamente, non potrebbero essere ulteriori dalla verità. Infatti, il concetto della libertà totale del mercato è in sé molto più marxista dell’approccio continentale tradizionale all’economia.

Il liberalismo, mentre domina oggi i dibattiti scientifici e politici, viene da una scuola di pensiero completamente differente che non ha radici nella teoria tradizionale dell’economia nazionale. Coloro che ha formulato gli impianti essenziali sull’economia liberale ha avuto loro esperienza personale non nel campo di lavoro e di rifornimento lavoranti o d’organizzazioni per la gente in certa area ma piuttosto commerciata nel commercio transregionale o nei mercati azionari. Di conseguenza non è una sorpresa che il loro proprio interesse economico viene a dominare la loro costruzione teorica. Questa gente ha trasformato il loro interesse in nessun frontiere per commercio una legge economica centrale del „“, sebbene non fosse legge naturale come la legge di gravità ma richiesta alla legislazione.

Oggi la teoria del „“dei mercati liberi, che è in effetti un modo meravigliosamente senza problemi per globalmente il funzionamento delle preoccupazioni commerciali per guadagnare i gran quantità del profitto, anche osa forzare i flussi fondamentali del „quattro “sopra ogna singolo nazione. Questi flussi sono: Soldi (Investitions dentro e profitti fuori), merci (le risorse naturali DEVONO essere permesse fuori dappertutto, prodotti dentro dappertutto), informazioni (riguardo ai fattori di produzione) e mano d’opera. L’ultima cosa di questi è il più pericoloso di tutti, poichè un flusso libero dei lavoratori attraverso il globo si pianterà sull’intera gente e le forzerà in un sistema senza anima di sfruttamento ed in una massimizzazione dei profitti. Per assicurare questi quattro flussi, la strategia militare degli Stati Uniti considera di stabilire un quinto flusso: quello “dei servizi strategici degli Stati Uniti„, che realmente mezzi: Guerra con ogni nazione che resiste all’implementazione dei flussi.

Dove Marx critica il capitalismo del „“, è sempre questa forma di capitalismo che descrive. Dal punto di vista 19. del secolo in anticipo Germania, questa è per quanto ci sia falso mezzi reali di limitazione e di moderazione dei mercati dalla legislazione imponente a favore di benessere nazionale. La discussione principale di Marx‘ è: In un’economia poichè la descrive, la rivoluzione è una necessità. Ma poichè Marx considera la rivoluzione una necessità comunque, perché le cose non lasciate risultano realmente cattivo per le masse in primo luogo. Di conseguenza i capitalisti più senza scrupoli, i banchieri internazionali ed i marxisti hanno andato di accordo sempre così molto buon per i 150 anni ultimi. I marxisti, infatti, anche sono stormtroopers dei banchieri‘ che fanno il loro lavoro sporco ma necessario.

Il sistema della regola marxista verrà modo, sia via una rivoluzione marxista o come minaccia di strisciamento, poichè è oggi. Nè il liberalismo occidentale nè il marxismo classico condurrà le società europee ed americane da quel movimento di tenaglia. Forse una considerazione delle teorie continentali di lunga data ma a lungo dimenticate dell’economia olistica può fornire un’uscita.

III. Propaganda di guerra

A seguito dell’istituzione di grandi stati-nazione, i grandi eserciti regolari sono stati messi su e per fornire a questi eserciti un senso di cui erano per, gli stati hanno dovuto condurre la propaganda su una maggior scala. I potere occidentali, particolarmente Gran-Bretagna, hanno avuto molto presto questo punto. La Gran-Bretagna era la forza motrice nel encirculating la Reich tedesca, poichè, dalla posizione di no. 1, era impaurita di tutto il concurrent possibilmente che aumenta sul continente. Per preparare propagandistically una guerra contro la Germania, il Tavistock Institute del „con relazioni umane “è stato fondato. Mai sentito parlare? Ed ha luogo ancora in atto, per 100 anni ora. Questo istituto instrumentalized la diffamazione, l’infamia e le bugie per la causa di demonizzare la Germania come gente.

Per ottenere i legami di guerra ha venduto ai cittadini britannici semplici per il finanziamento delle misure della guerra della Gran-Bretagna, l’istituto installato in loro manifesti della propaganda l’idea della Germania che punta che conquista l’intero mondo e che asservisce Britanni. Hanno sparso le bugie dei soldati tedeschi che tagliano mani dei bambini‘, colza le suore belghe e trasformanti i soldati britannici caduti nell’alimento dei maiali – anche in WWI!

C’è questa persona nominata Edward Bernays. Era un ebreo americano, un nipote a Sigmund Freud. Poichè la rete ebrea ha voluto l’America aderire alle forze con la Gran-Bretagna contro la Germania, Bernays è andato in Gran-Bretagna ed ha funzionato nel Tavistock Institute con lo scopo di propagandare fino alla gente americana finché non credessero la guerra contro la Germania, a cui gli Stati Uniti non hanno confinato ed a cui non ha posato mai una minaccia diretta contro, era una necessità. Potete pensare ad un maggior atto del tradimento che entrando la vostra patria in una guerra a favore di un potere straniero, senza l’interesse minimo per se stesso? Dopo che la guerra si era conclusa, Bernays instrumentalized alcune delle tecniche propagandistic per la pubblicità e per le campagne pubbliche, che sono stato conosciute come le pubbliche relazioni.

La Germania non ha avuta niente mettere contro questa perfidia. Ha provato a presentare i fatti e le figure circa formazione nazionale, spesa per le forze armate e la quantità di navi di guerra costruite per invalidare le accuse di essere „barbaro “, „alla ricerca di guerra “o militarista del „“. Purtroppo, la verità circa questi argomenti è soltanto presentabile come numeri ed i manifesti della propaganda che presentano i numeri non sono molto presunti prendere occhi della gente‘ e portare in soldi dai legami di guerra. Soltanto il del 1917, i tedeschi hanno fatto il loro primo manifesto solo immagine della propaganda, mostrante un soldato con il siegen dei uns di Helft del „di parole “(aiutici vittoria). Ha sollevato dieci volte il risultato dei manifesti precedenti. Tragicamente, prima che la Germania perdesse WWI militarically, ha perso propagandistically la guerra.

E questa tragedia anche ripetuta in WWII, come la Germania aveva ricavato le conseguenze dal disastro della propaganda in WWI. I rami propagandistic degli alleati di Goebbels‘ il ministero per il chiarimento pubblico e la propaganda, che successivamente è stata demonizzata come dire le bugie malfamate, aveva trovato realmente appena un modo di mettere le cose nei titoli orecchiabili mentre‘ hanno sparso le bugie ancor più diaboliche sopra il mondo. Purtroppo, il potere che si è trovato molto più di meno perso ancora e poi è stato incolpato di tutti i peccati ogni potere di combattimento aveva commesso. Cerchi appena il nome di Ilja Ehrenburg se volete sapere di che genere la propaganda di guerra degli alleati‘ era.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Fyra teer på Tyskland och det västra

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors.Maskinöversättning. Inget ansvar för översättningsfel.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

vid Schattenkoenig

Att förbereda sig för en intervju med Carolyn Yeager fungerade Schattenkoenig ut på engelskt efter tankarna som markerar några avgörande aspekter av Tyskland (och, i allmänhet, west’sen) läge.

I. Det tyska begreppet av Geopolitik

Benämna beskriver en skissera av globala politiska strategier som centreras på den tyska reichen, och grundat i traditionen av holistic beskådar som hade dominerat tyskt tänkande efter medeltiden, då reichen (heligt romerskt välde av den Germanic nationen) hade bildat en sort av att beställa stag för nationer som underhöll deras autonomi och medborgaretecken. I den nya åldern var ett mer genetisk Viewpoint etablerat och att ge respekt till olikt bemannar‘ tecken.

Viktigast verkar till mig rota av tyska Geopolitik i ett vetenskapligt och rationally nått perspektiv av vad ges naturligt. Det funderare av bemannar som av vad de är egentligen och vad deras realistiska spänningar är, i stället för att bilda bemannar enligt någon utopianideologi som är otillräcklig för verklighet. Överheten som var segerrik över Tyskland i 1945, var tyvärr efter ideologiska begrepp och hade respekt för bemannar lite‘ naturligt villkorar. Om verklighet orsakar, beskådar deras utopian för att missa, det värre gör de det att vända ut för verklighet som ska tvingas till „ändring ”- tills alla värld ska vaket upp i ett nytt totalitärt och jordklot-spänna över sovjet – union med ingen frihet som lämnades för att tala ut fakta.

Geopolitik var fullständigt medveten av faktumet att det fanns överhet i världen som siktar på att resa upp ett sådan globalt totalitärt och konstgjort system. De tyska intellektuellerna hade fullständigt känt igen västra frisinnad kapitalism och Marxism, som två sidor av en medalj eller, i en bättre analogi, två beväpnar i en pincerrörelse med målet av att förkrossa alla nationer och att blanda dem in i ett ekonomiskt system för värld. Geopolitik var en defensiv teori mot dessa försök som företa sig av Frankrike, Storbritannien och som var mer sistnämnd, av sovjet – union.

Ideal av tyska Geo – politiken var den organiska nationen för „”, definierade som fysiskt, morally och economically sunt folk som realiserar optimalt dess givna spänningar. Medborgare som ekonomi skulle för att skyddas från beroende intresserar yttre, därför adopterades en sträva för „autarky ”. En nation, som är kompetent till jordbruksprodukter allt det, behöver och konsumerar inom deras bevakade boarders är mindre rimlig att utövas utpressning mot eller stifleds i fall att av konflikt.

Detta begrepp var redan en stark motivation, för världen kriger I, och medborgaresocialisterna tillfogade begreppet av ras- renhet för „”, som de trodde teckenet av folk och även dess politiska beslut som var determinated av dess genetik. Detta ledde också till dödliga fel, som e.g, de förväntade England att vara en naturlig bundsförvant mot Frankrike och Ryssland. De kunde inte ha varit mer ytterligare från vad därefter händde egentligen, som Britannien (och också U.S.en) fullständigt underminerades och subverted av ett hemligt, driva kapabelt av att dominera folk totalt, economically och mentalt.

Som det tyska folket var stilla i demografisk tillväxt på tiden, framkallades begreppet, och Tysklandet hade redan en kickbefolkningtäthet, begreppet av „Lebensraum ”nådd betydelse. Även verkar populariserades idén, att en mindre nation, som hade inget tillfälle att nå autarky och styrka på deras eget skulle försvinna och ge sig långt till dess mer stora grann, för att ha uppstiget från de tidigaste begreppen och endast av Hitler och medborgaresocialisterna som en sort av social darwinism av nationer. Begreppet har ingenting att göra med folkmord, eller utrota bemannar i favör av en annan, men, som det fanns en teori som länder gillar i Belgien, hade Luxembourg eller Polen inget perspektiv av existerande mycket längre, verkar det ej längre ett stort ting för att torka dem av kartlägga avsiktligt, och att underkuva deras bemannar till tysk herravälde.

Geopolitiken hade också respekt för existerande gränsar lite på grund av det naturligt villkorar av Tysklandet som har inga naturliga gränser, och därför efter att ha varit betvinga till utländska inhoppar sedan århundraden tillbaka (e.g de trettio åren‘ kriger). Den enda boarderen av intresserar var „en Volksgrenze ”, som var tillåten att utvidga och också att ge sig långt till militärt hjälpmedel, om det tyska folket utvidgade ständigt.

II. Tyskt och västra begrepp av ekonomisk vetenskap

I ett liknande långt som Geopolitik beskådar tysken på nationalekonomi var integrerad och holistic. Det hade alltid varit en konsensus, även det okända den tyska boarderen, som totalt obehärskadt marknadsför poserar ett strängt hot till frihet, och säkerhet av bemannar och kan även avslutar upp i samlas svält och folkmord. I en ekonomi som är obehärskad med hjälp av „som, det statligt ”är det skulle, spelareaktivet som siktar till någonsin mer stor, kontrollerar av marknadsföra och till någonsin mer stor vinster, och är mer vinst en skulle spelare kompetent att göra, det mer väldig och mindre samvetsöm skulle han blivet, och, som han att bry sig inte för folkets välfärd men endast hans vinst, är resultatet skulle ett stort monopol med prissätter för saker av grundläggande behov den genomsnittliga konsumenten är oförmögen att betala.

Tyska ekonomiska forskare, och även från andra européländer liksom Frankrike, Italien eller England, var medvetna att, för att ne målet av medborgarevälstånd, det måste att finnas etablerat enkontrollerad ekonomi för saker av grundläggande behov, liksom bevattnar, elektricitet, mat, kommunikationen och transport.

Om du talar till ekonomiska liberalists i dag och kommer upp med detta faktum, ska de skarpt kritisera vanligt sådan sorter av tankar att vara „marxisten ”, „socialisten ”, eller annat hårt uttrycker. De har inhalated begreppet av sammanlagd frihet av varje ekonomisk rörelse, speciellt bemannar det av och pengar. Stunder som de gör så i oder för att tysta opposition för även den kan framkalla dess tankar fullständigt, dem, kunde inte vara mer ytterligare från sanningen. I faktum marknadsför begreppet av slutsumman frihet är i honom som mycket är mer marxistisk, än det traditionella kontinentalt att närma sig till ekonomi.

Liberalism, som den dominerar vetenskapliga och politiska debatter i dag, kommer från ett fullständigt olikt skolar av tanke som har inget rotar i den traditionella teorin av medborgarenationalekonomi. De, som formulerade de nödvändiga arbetena på frisinnad ekonomi hade deras personligt att erfara inte i sätta in av arbetet eller uppläggningarbete och tillförsel för folket i ett bestämt område, men som handlade ganska i transregional handel eller i aktiemarknader. Därför är det inte en överrrakning att deras egna ekonomiskt intresserar kommer att dominera deras teoretiska byggnad. Dessa folk gjorde deras för att intressera i inga gränser för handel in i en ekonomisk „lag för central ”, även om det är ingen naturlag som lagen av gravitation men en begäran till lagstiftning.

I dag marknadsför „teorin ”av fritt, som är i faktumet som ett wonderfully unproblematic för fungerande handel globalt angår långt för att nå enorma belopp av vinst, även utmaningar att tvinga grundflödena för „fyra ”på varje singelnation. Dessa flöden är: Pengar (Investitions in och vinster ut), godor (naturresurser MÅSTE vara tillåtna ut överallt, produkter in överallt), information (att angå produktion dela upp i faktorer) och Workforce. Det sist tinget av dessa är det farligast allra, som ett fritt flöde av arbetare över det ska jordklotet rotar upp helt bemannar och tvingar dem in i ett själlöst system av exploatering och maximization av vinster. Att säkra dessa fyra flöden, betraktar den militära strategin för U.S. för att upprätta ett femte flöde: det av ”Strategical U.S. servar”, som faktiskt hjälpmedel: Kriga på varje nation som motstår genomförandet av flödena.

Var Marx kritiserar „kapitalism ”, är den alltid denna bildar av kapitalism som han beskriver. Från perspektiv av århundradeTysklandet för tidig sort 19. är detta, osannt som det fanns faktiskt hjälpmedel av att begränsa, och dämpa marknadsför vid imponera lagstiftning i favör av medborgarevälfärd. Marx‘ är det huvudsakliga argumentet: I en ekonomi, som han beskriver den, är rotationen en nödvändighet. Men, som Marx betraktar rotation en nödvändighet på något sätt, därför den inte låtna sakervänden ut bjöd egentligen för, samlas först. Därför de mest skrupelfria kapitalisterna, landskampbankirerna och marxistsna som alltid fås längs så mycket bra för jumbon 150 år. Marxists i faktum, är även bankir stormtroopers, som gör deras smutsar ner, bara nödvändigt arbete.

Det marxistiska systemet av härskar ska kommet endera långt, är det via en marxistisk rotation eller som ett krypa hot, som det är todayen. Ingen av västra liberalism nor klassisk Marxism ska bly- europé- och amerikansamhällen ut ur den pincerrörelse. Kanske kan ett övervägande av deetablerade men lång-glömda kontinentala teorierna av holistic nationalekonomi ge en utfart.

III. Kriga propaganda

Efter påstår etableringen av den stora nationen, sattes stora stås arméer upp, och för att att ge till dessa arméer en avkänning av vad de var för, påstår måste att föra propaganda på ett mer stor fjäll. Den västra överheten, speciellt Britannien, hade fått denna pekar mycket tidig sort. Britannien var drivkraften, i encirculating av den tyska reichen, som den, från nr.en 1 placerar, var rädd av någon resning för concurrent eventuellt på kontinenten. För att förbereda en kriga mot Tyskland propagandistically, grundades det „Tavistock institutet på människaförbindelse ”. Någonsin hört av den? Och den är stilla i existens, för 100 år nu. Detta institut instrumentalized ärekränkning, infamy och lies för orsaka av den demonizing Tysklandet som folk.

För att få kriga förbindelser som säljs till enkla brittiska medborgare för att finansiera Britannien, kriger mäter, ställer in institutet i deras propagandaaffischer idén av Tysklandet som siktar på att erövra den hela världen och att förslava britter. De spridning som liesna av tyskt soldatklipp behandla som ett barn av‘, räcker och att våldta belgiska nunnor, och att bearbeta stupad britt tjäna som soldat in i swinemat – även i WWI!

Det finns denna person som namnges Edward Bernays. Han var en amerikanjude, en brorson till Sigmund Freud. Som det judiskt knyter kontakt önskade Amerika för att sammanfoga styrkor med Britannien mot Tyskland, gick fungerade Bernays till Britannien och i det Tavistock institutet med målet av propagandizing unto amerikanfolket, tills de trodde kriger mot Tysklandet, som U.S.et inte gränsade till, och som poserade aldrig ett riktahot till det, var en nödvändighet. Kan dig funderare av ett mer stor agerar av treason, än få ditt hemland in i en kriga i favör av ett utländskt driva, utan det mest obetydlig intresserar för honom? Efter kriga hade avslutat, instrumentalized Bernays några av de propagandistic teknikerna för att annonsera och för offentliga aktioner, som blev bekant som PR.

Tysklandet hade ingenting till uppsättningen mot denna svekfullhet. Den försökte att framlägga fakta och figurerar om medborgareutbildning, förbrukning för krigsmakten, och beloppet av kriger ships som byggs för att göra beskyllningarna av att vara barbarisk „”, „kriga-sökande ”eller „militaristen ogiltig ”. Tyvärr är sanningen om dessa ämnen endast presentabel som numrerar, och propagandaaffischer som att framlägga numrerar, är inte mycket förment att fånga bemannar‘ synar och kommer med i pengar från kriger förbindelser. Endast som av 1917, föreställer-endast germansna som göras deras första, propagandaaffischen, visning som en soldat med uttrycker siegen för „Helft uns ”(hjälp oss segern). Den lyftte tio tider resultatet av de föregående affischerna. Tragically för Tysklandet borttappad WWI militarically, det som är borttappadt kriga propagandistically.

Och denna tragedi även upprepad i WWII, som Tysklandet hade dragit följder från propagandakatastrofen i WWI. Goebbels‘ departement för offentlig insikt och propaganda, som har därpå demonized som hade det träffande ökända lies, funnit faktiskt precis a långt av att sätta saker in i catchy rubriker för att fördriva de propagandistic bundsförvanterna förgrena sig mer djävulsk lies för spridning även över världen. Tyvärr syndar hade driva, som låg mycket mindre borttappadt igen och därefter klandrades för alla, varje stridighet driver begått. Se precis upp det känt av Ilja Ehrenburg, om du önskar att veta av vilken sort som bundsförvanterna kriger propaganda var.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Cuatro tesis en Alemania y el oeste

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Traducción automática. No nos hacemos responsables de errores de traducción.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

por Schattenkoenig

Para prepararse para una entrevista con Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig resolvió en inglés los pensamientos siguientes para destacar algunos aspectos cruciales de la situación de Alemania (y, generalmente el oeste).

I. El concepto alemán de Geopolitik

El término describe un esquema de las estrategias políticas globales centradas en el Reich alemán y fundadas en la tradición de las visiónes holísticas que habían dominado el pensamiento alemán desde las Edades Medias, cuando el Reich (Sacro Imperio Romano de la nación germánica) había formado una clase de apoyo que ordenaba para las naciones que mantuvieron su autonomía y carácter nacional. En la nueva edad, un punto de vista más genético fue establecido, dando respecto caracteres a diversa gente los‘.

El más importante parece a mí el arraigo del alemán Geopolitik en una perspectiva científica y racional ganada de qué se da naturalmente. Piensa en la gente a partir de cuál son realmente y de cuáles son sus potenciales realistas, en vez de formar a gente según una cierta ideología utópica que sea inadecuada para la realidad. Los poderes victoriosos sobre Alemania en 1945 desafortunadamente seguían conceptos ideológicos y tenían poco respecto por las condiciones naturales de la gente‘. Si la realidad hace sus opiniones utópicas fallar, peor hacen que resulta para la realidad que son forzadas al cambio del „“- hasta todo el mundo despiertan en una nueva Unión Soviética totalitaria y globo-que atraviesa sin la libertad dejada para hablar hacia fuera los hechos.

Geopolitik era plenamente consciente del hecho de que había poderes en el mundo que tenía como objetivo erigiendo un sistema totalitario y artificial tan global. Los intelectuales alemanes habían reconocido completamente capitalismo y marxismo liberales occidentales como dos lados de una medalla o, en de una mejor analogía, de dos brazos en un movimiento de tenazas con el objetivo de abrumar todas las naciones y de mezclarlas en un sistema económico de mundo. Geopolitik era una teoría defensiva contra estas tentativas emprendidas por Francia, Gran Bretaña y, más adelante, por la Unión Soviética.

El ideal de la geopolítica alemana era la nación orgánica del „“, definió como a la gente físicamente, moral y económicamente sana que explotaba óptimo sus potenciales dados. La economía nacional debía ser salvaguardada de dependencia a los intereses exteriores, por lo tanto un esfuerzo para la autarquía del „“fue adoptado. Una nación que puede producir todo él necesita y consume dentro de sus huéspedes guardados es menos probable ser chantajeada o ser sofocada en caso de conflicto.

Este concepto era ya una motivación fuerte antes de Primera Guerra Mundial, y los socialistas nacionales añadieron el concepto de pureza racial del „“mientras que creyeron el carácter de una gente e incluso de sus decisiones políticas determinated por su genética. Esto también llevó a los errores no recuperables, e.g mientras que esperaron que Inglaterra fuera un aliado natural contra Francia y Rusia. No habrían podido ser más futuras de qué entonces sucedió realmente, pues Gran Bretaña (y también los E.E.U.U.) fueron minados y derribados totalmente por un poder clandestino capaz de dominar a una gente totalmente, económicamente y mentalmente.

Mientras que la gente alemana todavía estaba en crecimiento demográfico en ese entonces el concepto fue desarrollado, y Alemania tenía ya una alta densidad demográfica, el concepto importancia ganada de Lebensraum del „“. Incluso la idea que una nación más pequeña que no tenía ninguna oportunidad de ganar autarquía y fuerza en sus los propio fuera desaparecer y llevar a su mayor vecino parece haber subido de los conceptos más tempranos, y fue popularizada solamente por Hitler y los socialistas nacionales como clase de darwinismo social de naciones. El concepto no tiene nada hacer con genocidios o gente del exterminio a favor de otro, pero como había una teoría en la cual los países tienen gusto de Bélgica, Luxemburgo o Polonia no tenía ninguna perspectiva de la existencia mucho más de largo, parece no más una cosa grande para limpiarla del mapa deliberadamente y para someter a su gente al dominio alemán.

El Geopolitik también tenía poco respecto por fronteras existentes debido a la condición natural de Alemania que no tenía ningún límite natural y por lo tanto que estaba conforme a intrusiones extranjeras durante siglos (e.g los treinta años‘ de guerra). El único huésped del interés era el „Volksgrenze “, que fue permitido ampliarse, también llevando a los medios militares, si la gente alemana se amplió continuamente.

II. Concepto alemán y occidental de ciencia económica

De una manera similar como Geopolitik, la opinión alemana sobre la economía era integrada y holística. Había sido siempre un consenso, incluso más allá del huésped alemán, que los mercados totalmente incontrolados plantean una amenaza severa para la libertad y la seguridad de la gente e incluso pudieron terminar para arriba en el hambre total y el genocidio. En una economía incontrolada mediante „el estado “allí sería el apuntar activo de los jugadores al control siempre mayor del mercado y a beneficios siempre mayores, y más el beneficio un jugador podría hacer, el más poderoso y menos escrupuloso él se convirtió, y como él cuida no para el bienestar pero solamente el suyo de la gente beneficio, el resultado sería un monopolio grande con los precios para las cosas de la necesidad básica que el consumidor medio no puede pagar.

Los científicos económicos alemanes, e incluso de otros países europeos tales como Francia, Italia o Inglaterra, eran conscientes que, para alcanzar la meta de la prosperidad nacional, allí tuvo que ser establecido una economía controlada por el Estado para las cosas de necesidades básicas, tales como agua, electricidad, comida, comunicación y transporte.

Si usted está hablando con los liberalists económicos hoy y sube con este hecho, denunciarán generalmente tales clases de pensamientos para ser marxista del „“, „socialista “u otras palabras fuertes. Inhalated el concepto de libertad total de cada movimiento económico, especialmente de la de gente y de dinero. Mientras que hacen tan en oder para silenciar la oposición incluso antes de que puede desarrollar sus pensamientos totalmente, no podrían ser más futuros de la verdad. De hecho, el concepto de libertad total del mercado está en sí mismo mucho más marxista que el acercamiento continental tradicional a la economía.

El liberalismo, mientras que domina discusiones científicos y políticos hoy, viene de una escuela de pensamiento totalmente diversa que no tenga ninguna raíz en la teoría tradicional de la economía nacional. Los que formularon los trabajos esenciales sobre economía liberal tenían su experiencia personal no en el campo del trabajo y de la fuente de trabajo o de organización para la gente en cierta área pero tratada bastante en comercio transregional o en mercados de acción. Por lo tanto no es una sorpresa que su propio interés económico viene dominar su edificio teórico. Esta gente hizo su interés en ningunos límites para el comercio en una ley económica central del „“, aunque no sea ningún derecho natural como la ley de la gravedad sino demanda a la legislación.

La teoría del „“de mercados libres, que es de hecho una manera maravillosamente aproblemática para global actuar las preocupaciones comerciales para ganar enormes cantidades de beneficio, incluso se atreve hoy a forzar los flujos fundamentales del „cuatro “sobre cada nación. Estos flujos son: Dinero (Investitions adentro y beneficios hacia fuera), mercancías (los recursos naturales SE DEBEN permitir hacia fuera por todas partes, productos adentro por todas partes), información (respecto a factores de producción) y mano de obra. La cosa pasada de éstos es la más peligrosa de todos, pues un libre flujo de trabajadores a través del globo arraigará encima de gente entera y la forzará en un sistema desalmado de explotación y la maximización de beneficios. Para asegurar estos cuatro flujos, la estrategia militar de los E.E.U.U. considera para establecer un quinto flujo: el de los “servicios estratégicos de los E.E.U.U.”, que realmente medios: Guerra en cada nación que resiste la puesta en práctica de los flujos.

Donde Marx critica capitalismo del „“, es siempre esta forma de capitalismo que él describe. Desde la perspectiva 19. del siglo temprano Alemania, ésta es tan falso que había medios reales de limitar y de moderar mercados por la legislación imponente a favor de bienestar nacional. La discusión principal de Marx‘ es: En una economía como él la describe, la revolución es una necesidad. Pero como Marx considera la revolución una necesidad de todos modos, porqué las cosas no dejadas resultan realmente malo para las masas primero. Por lo tanto los capitalistas más sin escrúpulos, los banqueros internacionales y los marxistas conseguidos siempre a lo largo tan de muy bueno por los 150 años pasados. Los marxistas, de hecho, incluso son stormtroopers de los banqueros los‘ que hacen su trabajo sucio pero necesario.

El sistema de regla marxista vendrá manera, sea vía una revolución marxista o como una amenaza del arrastramiento, pues es hoy. Ni el liberalismo occidental ni el marxismo clásico llevará a sociedades europeas y americanas fuera de ese movimiento de tenazas. Quizá una consideración de las teorías continentales establecidas desde hace tiempo pero largo-olvidadas de la economía holística puede proporcionar una salida.

III. Propaganda de la guerra

Después del establecimiento de grandes naciones estado, pusieron a los grandes ejércitos derechos, y para proporcionar a estos ejércitos un sentido para de cuál estaban, los estados tuvieron que conducir propaganda en una mayor escala. Los poderes occidentales, especialmente Gran Bretaña, tuvieron este punto muy temprano. Gran Bretaña era la fuerza impulsora en encirculating el Reich alemán, pues, de la posición de no. 1, tenía miedo del concurrente que subía posiblemente en el continente. Para preparar una guerra contra Alemania propagandista, el Tavistock Institute del „en relaciones humanas “fue fundado. ¿Nunca oído hablar le? Y ahora todavía está en existencia, por 100 años. Este instituto instrumentalized la difamación, la infamia y las mentiras para la causa de demonizing Alemania como gente.

Para conseguir enlaces de guerra vendió a los ciudadanos británicos simples para financiar las medidas de la guerra de Gran Bretaña, el instituto puesto en sus carteles de la propaganda la idea de Alemania que tenía como objetivo que conquistaba el mundo entero y que esclavizaba a británico. ¡Separaron las mentiras de los soldados alemanes que cortaban manos a los bebés las‘, violando a monjas belgas y procesando a soldados británicos caidos en la comida de los cerdos – incluso en WWI!

Hay esta persona nombrada Edward Bernays. Él era un judío americano, sobrino a Sigmund Freud. Pues la red judía quisiera que América se uniera a fuerzas con Gran Bretaña contra Alemania, Bernays fue a Gran Bretaña y trabajó en el Tavistock Institute con el objetivo de hacer propaganda de a la gente americana hasta que ella creyera guerra contra Alemania, a la cual los E.E.U.U. no confinaron y a la cual nunca planteó una amenaza directa para ella, era una necesidad. ¿Puede usted pensar en un mayor acto de la traición que consiguiendo su patria en una guerra a favor de un poder extranjero, sin el interés más leve para sí mismo? Después de que la guerra hubiera terminado, Bernays instrumentalized algunas de las técnicas propagandistas para hacer publicidad y para las campañas públicas, que se conocían como relaciones públicas.

Alemania no tenía nada fijar contra esta perfidia. Intentó presentar los hechos y las figuras sobre la educación nacional, el gasto para las fuerzas armadas de arma y la cantidad de naves de guerra construidas para invalidar las acusaciones de ser „brutal “, guerra-buscar del „“o militarista del „“. Desafortunadamente, la verdad sobre estos temas es solamente presentable como números, y los carteles de la propaganda que presentan números no son muy supuestos coger ojos a la gente los‘ y traerla en dinero de enlaces de guerra. Solamente 1917, los alemanes hicieron su primer cartel de la propaganda de la imagen-solamente, mostrando a un soldado con el siegen de los uns de Helft del „de las palabras “(ayúdenos triunfo). Aumentó diez veces el resultado de los carteles anteriores. Trágico, antes de que Alemania perdiera WWI militarically, perdió la guerra propagandista.

Y esta tragedia incluso repetida en WWII, como Alemania había extraído consecuencias del desastre de la propaganda en WWI. Las ramas propagandistas de los aliados de Goebbels el‘ ministerio de la aclaración pública y de la propaganda, que demonized posteriormente como decir mentiras infames, realmente acababa de encontrar una manera de poner cosas en títulos pegadizos mientras que‘ separaron mentiras aún más diabólicas sobre el mundo. Desafortunadamente, el poder que mintió perdido mucho menos otra vez y después fue culpado por todos los pecados cada poder que luchaba había confiado. Apenas mire para arriba el nombre de Ilja Ehrenburg si usted quiere saber de qué clase propaganda de la guerra de los aliados era la‘.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Quatro teses em Alemanha e no oeste

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Tradução de máquina. Não se responsabiliza por erros de tradução.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

por Schattenkoenig

Para preparar-se para uma entrevista com Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig dou certo em inglês os seguintes pensamentos para destacar alguns aspectos cruciais da situação de Alemanha (e, geralmente, o oeste).

I. O conceito alemão de Geopolitik

O termo descreve um esboço das estratégias políticas globais centradas no Reich alemão e fundadas na tradição das vistas holísticas que tinham dominado o pensamento alemão desde a Idade Média, quando o Reich (império romano santamente da nação germânica) tinha formado um tipo da cinta pedindo para as nações que mantiveram seus autonomia e caráter nacional. Na idade nova, um ponto de vista mais genético foi estabelecido, dando o respeito caráteres aos povos diferentes‘.

O mais importante parece-me o enraizamento do alemão Geopolitik em uma perspectiva científica e racional ganhada do que é dado naturalmente. Pensa dos povos até à data do que são realmente e de quais seus potenciais realísticos são, em vez de formar povos de acordo com alguma ideologia visionária que é inadequada para a realidade. Os poderes vitoriosos sobre Alemanha em 1945 infelizmente seguiam conceitos ideológicos e tiveram pouco respeito para condições naturais dos povos‘. Se a realidade faz com que suas opiniões visionárias falhem, mais mal o fazem despejar para a realidade que estarão forçadas à mudança do „“- até todo o mundo acordarão em uma União Soviética totalitário e globo-medindo nova sem a liberdade deixada para falar para fora os ternos.

Geopolitik era plenamente consciente do terno de que havia uns poderes no mundo que visa erigindo um sistema totalitário e artificial tão global. Os intelectuais alemães tinham reconhecido inteiramente o capitalismo e o marxismo liberais ocidentais como dois lados de uma medalha ou, em uma analogia melhor, em dois braços em um movimento de quela com o objectivo de oprimir todas as nações e de misturá-las em um sistema económico do mundo. Geopolitik era uma teoria defensiva contra estas tentativas empreendidas por França, Grâ Bretanha e, mais atrasado, pela União Soviética.

O ideal da geopolítica alemão era a nação orgânica do „“, definia como os povos fisicamente, moral e economicamente saudáveis que realizam óptima seus potenciais dados. A economia nacional devia ser protegida da dependência aos interesses externos, conseqüentemente um esforço para a autarcia do „“foi adotado. Uma nação que possa produzir tudo ele precisa e consome dentro de seus pensionistas guardados é menos provável ser feita chantagem ou reprimido em caso do conflito.

Este conceito era já uma motivação forte antes da Primeira Guerra Mundial, e os socialistas nacionais adicionaram o conceito da pureza racial do „“enquanto acreditaram o caráter de um pessoa e mesmo de suas decisões políticas que estão sendo determinated por sua genética. Isto igualmente conduziu aos erros fatais, por exemplo enquanto esperaram Inglaterra ser um aliado natural contra França e Rússia. Não poderiam ter sido mais adicionais do que então aconteceu realmente, porque Grâ Bretanha (e igualmente os E.U.) completamente foram minados e subvertidos por um poder clandestino capaz de dominar um pessoa totalmente, economicamente e mentalmente.

Enquanto o pessoa alemão estava ainda no crescimento demográfico naquele tempo o conceito foi desenvolvido, e Alemanha já teve uma densidade populacional alta, o conceito importância ganhada de Lebensraum do „“. Mesmo a ideia que uma nação menor que não tenha nenhuma oportunidade de ganhar a autarcia e a força no seus próprios seja desaparecer e levar a seu maior vizinho parece ter aumentado dos conceitos os mais adiantados, e foi popularizada somente por Hitler e pelos socialistas nacionais como um tipo do darwinismo social das nações. O conceito não não tem nada fazer com genocídios ou povos da exterminação em favor de um outro, mas como havia uma teoria em que os países gostam de Bélgica, Luxemburgo ou o Polônia não tiveram nenhuma perspectiva da existência muito mais por muito tempo, parece já não uma coisa grande para limpá-la deliberadamente fora do mapa e para conter seus povos à autoridade alemão.

O Geopolitik igualmente teve pouco respeito para beiras existentes devido à condição natural de Alemanha que não tem nenhum limite natural e conseqüentemente que é sujeita às intrusões estrangeiras há séculos (por exemplo os trinta anos‘ da guerra). O único pensionista do interesse era o „Volksgrenze “, que foi permitido expandir, igualmente levando aos meios militares, se os povos alemães expandiram continuamente.

II. Conceito alemão e ocidental da ciência econômica

Em uma maneira similar como Geopolitik, a vista alemão na economia era integrada e holística. Tinha sido sempre um consenso, mesmo além do pensionista alemão, que os mercados totalmente descontrolados levantam uma ameaça severa à liberdade e à segurança dos povos e mesmo puderam terminar acima na inanição maciça e no genocídio. Em uma economia descontrolada por meio do „o estado “lá seria apontar ativo dos jogadores ao controle sempre maior do mercado e aos lucros sempre maiores, e mais o lucro um jogador poderia fazer, o mais poderoso e menos escrupuloso tornar-se-ia, e como se importa não com o bem-estar mas unicamente o seu do pessoa lucro, o resultado seria um monopólio grande com preços para coisas da necessidade que básica o consumidor médio é incapaz de pagar.

Os cientistas econômicos alemães, e mesmo de outros países europeus tais como França, Itália ou Inglaterra, estavam cientes que, a fim alcançar o objetivo da prosperidade nacional, lá teve que ser estabelecido uma economia controlada pelo Estado para coisas de necessidades básicas, tais como a água, a eletricidade, o alimento, a comunicação e o transporte.

Se você está falando aos liberalists econômicos hoje e vem acima com este terno, delatarão geralmente tais tipos dos pensamentos para ser marxista do „“, „socialista “ou outras palavras duras. Inhalated o conceito da liberdade total de cada movimento econômico, especialmente de que dos povos e dinheiro. Quando fizerem assim em oder para silenciar a oposição mesmo antes que possa desenvolver seus pensamentos completamente, não poderiam ser mais adicionais da verdade. De fato, o conceito da liberdade total do mercado é em si mesmo muito mais marxista do que a aproximação continental tradicional à economia.

O liberalismo, enquanto domina debates científicos e políticos hoje, vem de uma escola de pensamento completamente diferente que não tem nenhuma raiz na teoria tradicional da economia nacional. Aqueles que formularam os trabalhos essenciais na economia liberal tiveram sua experiência pessoal não no campo do trabalho e da fonte de trabalho ou de organização para os povos em alguma área mas negociados um pouco no comércio transregional ou em mercados de valores de ação. Conseqüentemente não é uma surpresa que seu próprio interesse económico vem dominar sua construção teórica. Estes povos fizeram seu interesse em nenhuns limites para o comércio em uma lei econômica central do „“, embora não fosse nenhuma lei natural como a lei de gravidade mas uma procura à legislação.

Hoje a teoria do „“de mercados livres, que é de fato uma maneira maravilhosamente sem problemas para global operar os interesses de comércio para ganhar enormes quantidade do lucro, ousa mesmo forçar os fluxos fundamentais do „quatro “em cima de cada única nação. Estes fluxos são: Dinheiro (Investitions dentro e lucros para fora), bens (os recursos naturais DEVEM ser permitidos para fora em toda parte, produtos dentro em toda parte), informação (a respeito dos fatores de produção) e mão-de-obra. A última coisa destes é a mais perigosa de tudo, porque um fluxo livre dos trabalhadores através do globo enraizará acima dos povos inteiros e os forçará em um sistema desalmado de exploração e no máximo de lucros. Para fixar estes quatro fluxos, a estratégia militar dos E.U. considera para estabelecer um quinto fluxo: isso dos “dos serviços estratégicos E.U.”, que realmente meios: Guerra em cada nação que resiste a aplicação dos fluxos.

Onde Marx critica o capitalismo do „“, é sempre este formulário do capitalismo que descreve. Da perspectiva 19. do século adiantado Alemanha, esta é por mais falso que houvesse uns meios reais de limitar e de moderar mercados por legislação imponente em favor do bem-estar nacional. O argumento principal de Marx‘ é: Em uma economia como a descreve, a revolução é uma necessidade. Mas como Marx considera a revolução uma necessidade de qualquer maneira, porque as coisas não deixadas despejam realmente mau para as massas primeiramente. Conseqüentemente os capitalistas os mais sem escrúpulos, os banqueiros internacionais e os marxista obtidos sempre ao longo tão de muito bom pelos últimos 150 anos. Os marxista, de fato, são mesmo os stormtroopers dos banqueiros‘ que fazem seu trabalho sujo mas necessário.

O sistema de regra marxista virá de qualquer maneira, seja ele através de uma revolução marxista ou como uma ameaça do rastejamento, porque é hoje. Nem o liberalismo ocidental nem o marxismo clássico conduzirão sociedades européias e americanas fora desse movimento de quela. Talvez uma consideração das teorias continentais estabelecidos há muito tempo mas longo-esquecidas da economia holística pode fornecer uma maneira para fora.

III. Propaganda da guerra

Depois do estabelecimento de grandes estados-nação, os grandes exércitos eretos foram colocados, e a fim fornecer a estes exércitos um sentido do que fossem para, os estados tiveram que conduzir a propaganda em uma escala maior. Os poderes ocidentais, especialmente Grâ Bretanha, tinham obtido este ponto muito cedo. Grâ Bretanha era a força motriz em encirculating o Reich alemão, porque, da posição do no. 1, estava receosa do concurrent que aumenta possivelmente no continente. A fim preparar propagandistically uma guerra contra Alemanha, o Tavistock Institute do „em relações humanas “foi fundado. Ouvido nunca lhe? E realiza-se ainda na existência, por 100 anos agora. Este instituto instrumentalized a difamação, o infâmia e as mentiras para a causa de demonizing Alemanha como um pessoa.

A fim obter ligações de guerra vendeu aos cidadãos britânicos simples financiando medidas da guerra de Grâ Bretanha, instituto estabelecido em seus cartazes da propaganda a ideia de Alemanha que visa que conquista o mundo inteiro e que subjuga Britânicos. Espalharam as mentiras dos soldados alemães que eliminam as mãos dos bebês‘, violando freiras belgas e processando soldados britânicos caídos no alimento dos suínos – mesmo em WWI!

Há esta pessoa nomeada Edward Bernays. Era um judeu americano, um sobrinho a Sigmund Freud. Porque a rede judaica quis América aderir a forças com a Grâ Bretanha contra Alemanha, Bernays foi a Grâ Bretanha e trabalhou no Tavistock Institute com o objectivo de propagandizing até os povos americanos até que acreditaram a guerra contra Alemanha, a que os E.U. não limitaram e a que nunca levantou uma ameaça direta a ela, era uma necessidade. Pode você pensar de um ato maior da traição do que obtendo sua pátria em uma guerra em favor de um poder estrangeiro, sem o mais leve interesse para se? Depois que a guerra tinha terminado, Bernays instrumentalized algumas das técnicas propagandistic para anunciar e para as campanhas públicas, que se tornaram conhecidas como relações públicas.

Alemanha não não teve nada ajustar-se contra este perfidy. Tentou apresentar os ternos e as figuras sobre a educação nacional, a despesa para as forças armadas e a quantidade de navios de guerra construídos para invalidar as acusações de ser „bárbaro “, guerra-procurar do „“ou o militarista do „“. Infelizmente, a verdade sobre estes assuntos é somente apresentável como números, e os cartazes da propaganda que apresentam números não são muito supostos travar os olhos dos povos‘ e trazê-los no dinheiro das ligações de guerra. Somente 1917, os alemães fizeram seu primeiro cartaz da propaganda da imagem-somente, mostrando um soldado com o siegen dos uns de Helft do „das palavras “(nos ajude vitória). Levantou dez vezes o resultado dos cartazes precedentes. Tràgica, antes que Alemanha perdeu WWI militarically, perdeu a guerra propagandistically.

E esta tragédia repetida mesmo em WWII, como Alemanha tinha selecionado conseqüências do desastre da propaganda em WWI. Os ramos propagandistic dos aliados de Goebbels‘ o ministério para a iluminação pública e a propaganda, que subseqüentemente demonized como dizer mentiras infames, tinha encontrado realmente apenas uma maneira de pôr coisas em título atrativos quando‘ espalharam mentiras ainda mais diabólicas sobre o mundo. Infelizmente, o poder que se encontrou perdido muito menos outra vez e foi responsabilizado então por todos os pecados cada poder de combate tinha cometido. Apenas olhe acima o nome de Ilja Ehrenburg se você quer saber de que tipo a propaganda da guerra dos aliados‘ era.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »