Archive
Categories

Artikel-Schlagworte: „Lebensraum Geopolitik Volksgrenze“

在德国和西方的四份论文

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. 机器翻译。翻译错误不承担任何责任。.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

Schattenkoenig

要为与卡罗琳Yeager的一次采访做准备, Schattenkoenig制定出用英语突出德国的(和,一般来说,西方的)情况的一些关键的方面的以下想法。

i. Geopolitik的德国概念

期限在控制德国认为从中世纪全部看法的传统描述围绕在德国德国政府和建立的全球性政治战略概述,当德国政府(德国国家神圣罗马帝国)形成了一维护他们的自治权和民族特性的国家的预定的括号。 在新的年龄,一个更加基因的观点建立了,给对不同的人民的尊敬’字符。

最重要似乎给我根源德语Geopolitik于自然地给什么的一个科学和合理地被具有的观点。 它认为自什么他们真正地是,并且什么的人他们的现实潜力是,而不是形成人根据为现实是不充分的某一乌托邦思想体系。 力量战胜在1945的德国不幸地跟随思想概念并且有对人的一点尊敬’自然情况。 如果现实造成他们的乌托邦意图发生故障,越非常他们做它为现实结果将被强迫对„变动“-直到所有这个世界在新的极权和地球跨过的苏联将醒没有自由毫无保留地说出事实。

Geopolitik是完全意识的与这个事实有在瞄准这个的世界的力量架设这样一个全球性极权和人为系统。 德国知识分子充分地认可了西部宽宏资本主义和马克思主义作为一枚奖牌或,在更好的比喻,二条胳膊的双方在钳形运动打算淹没所有国家和混和他们入世界经济体系。 Geopolitik是一种防御理论反对苏联承担的由法国,英国,并且,以后,这些尝试。

德国地缘政治学理想是„有机国家“定义了成完全,道德上和经济上优选地发挥它的特定潜力的健康人民。 国民经济将从依赖性被保障到向外兴趣,因此一力争„经济独立政策“被采取了。 能生产一切它的国家在他们的被守卫的房客内需要并且消耗是不太可能在冲突的情况下被敲诈或被抑止。

这个概念已经是强的刺激在第一次世界大战前,并且全国社会主义者增加了„种族纯净的概念“当他们相信它的遗传学和甚而它的政治决定的determinated的字符人。 即,当他们盼望英国是一个自然盟友反对法国和俄罗斯,这也导致了致命错误。 他们不可能是进一步从发生什么真正地然后,因为英国(并且美国)由秘密力量完全地破坏并且推翻能够总,经济和精神控制人。

当德国人民当时仍然是在人口统计的成长这个概念被开发了,并且德国已经有高人口密度, „Lebensraum的概念“被获取的重要性。 想法没有机会独自地获取经济独立政策和力量的一个更小的国家是给它更加了不起的邻居消失和让路似乎从最早期的概念上升了和由希特勒和全国社会主义者只普及作为一国家社会达尔文主义。 这个概念与种族灭绝无关或灭绝人倾向于另一个,但是,当有国家喜欢比利时的理论,卢森堡或波兰没有透视非常长期存在,它不再似乎故意地抹他们这张地图和制服他们的人民的一件大事对德国统治。

Geopolitik也没有对现有的边界的一点尊敬由于有天然分界线并且几个世纪是受外国闯入支配的德国的自然情况(即三十年’战争)。 唯一的房客利益是„Volksgrenze “允许扩展,也让路给军事手段,如果德国人民不断地扩展了。

II.经济学的德国和西部概念

用作为Geopolitik的一个相似的方式,在经济的德国看法是联合和全部的。 它总是公众舆论,甚而在德国房客之外,完全未管制的市场在群众饥饿和种族灭绝造成对人自由和安全的严厉威胁和也许甚而结果。 在经济未管制通过„这个状态“那里是球员活跃瞄准对这个市场的更加巨大的控制和对更加巨大的赢利,并且更多赢利球员能做,更加强大和较不一丝不苟他会成为和,他对人民的福利,但是单独地他的关心不赢利,这个结果会是与价格的大独占一般的消费者无法支付基本需要的事的。

德国经济科学家,和甚而从其他欧洲国家例如法国,意大利或英国,知道,为了到达全国繁荣的目标,那里必须建立基本需要事的国家编制的经济,例如水、电、食物、通信和运输。

如果您与经济liberalists今天谈话并且产生这个事实,他们通常将谴责这样想法是„社会主义马克思主义者“„“或其他苛刻的话。 他们inhalated总自由每经济运动,特别是那人和金钱的概念。 当他们在奥得河如此做沉默反对时,在它可能完全地以前开发它的想法,他们不可能脱离事实。 实际上,总市场自由的概念比传统大陆方法本身马克思主义对经济。

自由主义,当它今天控制科学和政治辩论,来自没有根在全国经济的传统理论的一种完全不同的想法。 公式化在自由经济的根本工作有他们的个人经验不在运作的或组织的工作和供应领域人民的在有些区域的那些人,但是宁可成交在跨地区贸易或在股市上。 所以它不是惊奇他们自己的经济利益来控制他们的理论大厦。 这些人在没有界限上做了他们的兴趣贸易的成中央经济„法律“,虽然它是没有自然法则作为引力定律,但是需求对立法。

今天„理论“的自由市场,实际上是全球性操作的商业关心一个美妙地没有问题的方式获取巨额赢利,甚而敢强迫„四根本流程“在每一个国家。 这些流程是: 金钱(Investitions和赢利),物品(必须允许自然资源到处,产品到处),信息(关于生产因数)和劳工。 因为工作者自由流横跨地球的将根源整个人民并且迫使他们入开发一个卑鄙的系统和利润较大化,这些的最后事是最危险的所有。 要获取这四流程,美国军事战略考虑建立第五流程: 那“美国战略服务”,实际上手段: 在抵抗流程的实施的每个国家的战争。

那里马克思批评„资本主义“它总是他描述资本主义的这个形式。 从早期的19。世纪,尽管有限制和减轻市场实际手段由轰烈的立法倾向于全国福利,德国,这的角度是不真实的。 马克思’主要论据是: 在经济,因为他描述它,革命是必要。 但是,当马克思无论如何认为革命必要,没让的事为什么首先结果真正地坏大量的。 所以最肆无忌惮的资本家、沿那么非常有益于和马克思主义者总是得到的国际银行家最近150年。 马克思主义者,实际上,甚而是完成他们肮脏,但是必要的工作的银行家’突击队员。

因为它是今天,不管怎样马克思主义的体制将来,假如是通过一次马克思主义的革命或作为爬行威胁。 西部自由主义和古典马克思主义不会带领欧洲和美国社会出于那个钳形运动。 可能全部经济的长期建立,但是长期忘记的大陆理论的考虑也许提供出口。

III.战争宣传

在巨大“台独“的创立之后,了不起的常备军举起,并且为了提供给这些军队什么的感觉他们是为,状态必须举办在一更加伟大的等级的宣传。 西方力量,特别是英国,非常及早有这点。 英国是在encirculating德国德国政府的驱动力,因为它,从没有1位置,害怕可能上升在大陆的其中任一并发。 为了宣传地准备一场战争反对德国, „Tavistock学院在人际关系“被创办。 听说它? 并且它现有仍然是, 100年现在。 这所学院instrumentalized诽谤、臭名昭著和谎言着魔德国的起因的作为人。

为了得到战时公债卖了给简单的英国公民为提供经费给英国的战争措施,在他们的宣传海报设定的学院瞄准征服全世界和奴役不列颠人的德国的想法。 他们传播了切除婴孩’手,强奸比利时尼姑和处理下落的英国战士的德国士兵谎言成猪食物-甚而在WWI!

有这个人名叫爱德华Bernays。 他是美国犹太人, Sigmund弗洛伊德的一个侄子。 因为这个犹太网络要美国协力与英国反对德国, Bernays去英国并且在Tavistock学院运作打算宣传美国人民,直到他们相信战争反对德国,美国没有毗邻,并且未曾造成对它的直接威胁,是必要。 您比让您的家园进入能否认为谋反一次更加巨大的行动战争倾向于外国力量,不用本身的最轻微的兴趣? 在这场战争结束了后, Bernays instrumentalized某些宣传技术的做广告和的公共活动,出名作为公共关系。

德国什么都没有设置反对这背信弃义。 它设法提出事实和图关于国民教育、开支武力的和相当数量被修造的战舰无效指责是野蛮寻求战争的„“的„“或„军国主义者“。 不幸地,关于这些题目的真相只是象样的作为数字,并且出示号码的宣传海报不非常应该捉住人’眼睛和带来从战时公债的金钱。 在1917年,德国人仅做了他们的第一张图片宣传海报,显示有词„Helft uns siegen的一位战士“(请帮助我们胜利)。 它提高了十倍早先海报的结果。 悲剧地,在德国丢失了WWI militarically前,它宣传地输掉这场战争。

并且在WWII甚而重复的这个悲剧,德国从在WWI的宣传灾害得出了后果。 Goebbels’公众启蒙和宣传部,后来着魔了作为说臭名昭著的谎,实际上找到放事方式入吸引人的标题,当盟友’宣传分支传播了更加在这个世界时的恶魔般谎言。 不幸地,说谎再丢失和由于所有罪孽然后被责备每战斗的力量的力量做了。 请查寻Ilja Ehrenburg的名字,如果您要知道什么种类盟友’战争宣传是。

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »