Archive
Categories

Artikel-Schlagworte: „Tavistock Institute“

Quattro tesi sulla Germania e sull’ovest

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Traduzione automatica. Nessuna responsabilità per errori di traduzione.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

da Schattenkoenig

Per preparare per un’intervista con Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig ha risolto in inglese i seguenti pensieri per evidenziare alcuni aspetti cruciali della situazione della Germania (e, generalmente l’ovest).

I. Il concetto tedesco di Geopolitik

Il termine descrive un profilo delle strategie politiche globali concentrate sulla Reich tedesca e fondate nella tradizione delle viste olistiche che avevano dominato il pensiero tedesco dai medio evo, quando la Reich (sacro romano impero della nazione germanica) aveva formato un genere di gancio d’ordinazione per le nazioni che hanno mantenuto la loro autonomia e carattere nazionale. Nella nuova età, un punto di vista più genetico è stato stabilito, dante il rispetto caratteri alla gente differente‘.

Più importante sembra a me piantarsi del tedesco Geopolitik in una prospettiva scientifica e razionale guadagnata di che cosa è dato naturalmente. Pensa alla gente a partire da cui realmente sono e da cui i loro potenziali realistici sono, invece di formazione della gente secondo una certa ideologia utopistica che è insufficiente per la realtà. I poteri vittoriosi sopra la Germania nel 1945 purtroppo stavano seguendo i concetti ideologici ed hanno avuti poco rispetto per stati naturali della gente‘. Se la realtà induce i loro punti di vista utopistici a venire a mancare, peggio lo fanno risultare per la realtà che saranno forzati al cambiamento del „“- fino a tutto il mondo sveglieranno in nuova Unione Sovietica totalitaria e dimisurazione senza libertà lasciata per parlare fuori i fatti.

Geopolitik era ben consapevole del fatto che c’erano poteri nel mondo che punta erigendo così sistema totalitario ed artificiale globale. Gli intellettuali tedeschi completamente avevano riconosciuto il capitalismo ed il marxismo liberali occidentali come due lati di una medaglia o, in di migliore analogia, di due armi in un movimento di tenaglia con lo scopo di sopraffare tutte le nazioni e di mescolamento loro in un sistema economico del mondo. Geopolitik era una teoria difensiva contro questi tentativi intrapresi dalla Francia, Gran Bretagna e, successivamente, dall‘Unione Sovietica.

L’ideale di geopolitica tedesca era la nazione organica del „“, ha definito come la gente fisicamente, morale ed economicamente in buona salute che realizza ottimamente i suoi potenziali dati. L’economia nazionale doveva essere salvaguardata da dipendenza agli interessi esterni, quindi un tentare d’ottenere l’autarchia del „“è stato adottato. Una nazione che può produrre tutto ha bisogno di e consuma presso i loro pensionanti custodetti è meno probabile essere ricattata o soffocata nel caso del conflitto.

Questo concetto era già una forte motivazione prima della prima guerra mondiale ed i nazionalsocialisti hanno aggiunto il concetto della purezza razziale del „“mentre hanno creduto il carattere di una gente e perfino delle sue decisioni politiche che sono determinated dalla sua genetica. Ciò inoltre ha condotto agli errori mortali, per esempio mentre hanno invitare l’Inghilterra ad essere un alleato naturale contro la Francia e la Russia. Non potrebbero essere ulteriori da che cosa poi realmente è accaduto, poichè la Gran-Bretagna (ed anche gli Stati Uniti) completamente sono stati insidiati e sovvertito stati da un potere clandestino capace della dominazione della gente completamente, economicamente e mentalmente.

Mentre la gente tedesca era ancora allora nella crescita demografica il concetto è stato sviluppato e la Germania già ha avuta un’alta densità demografica, il concetto importanza assunta di Lebensraum del „“. Anche l’idea che una più piccola nazione che non ha avuta opportunità di guadagnare l’autarchia e la forza da sè era di scomparire e condurre al suo maggior vicino sembra aumentare dai concetti più iniziali e soltanto è stata diffusa da Hitler e dai nazionalsocialisti come genere di darwinismo sociale delle nazioni. Il concetto ha niente a che fare con i genocidi o la gente di sterminio a favore di altra, ma poichè c’era una teoria in cui i paesi gradiscono il Belgio, il Lussemburgo o la Polonia non ha avuta prospettiva di esistenza molto più lungamente, non sembra più una grande cosa per pulirle deliberatamente fuori dalla mappa e per sottomettere la loro gente a dominio tedesco.

Il Geopolitik inoltre ha avuto poco rispetto per i confini attuali a causa dello stato naturale della Germania che non ha frontiere naturali e quindi che è conforme alle intrusioni straniere per secoli (per esempio i trenta anni‘ di guerra). Il solo pensionante di interesse era il „Volksgrenze “, che è stato permesso espandersi, anche conducendo ai mezzi militari, se la gente tedesca si espandesse continuamente.

II. Concetto tedesco ed occidentale di scienza economica

In un simile modo come Geopolitik, la vista tedesca sull’economia era integrata ed olistica. Era stato sempre un consenso, anche oltre il pensionante tedesco, che i mercati completamente incontrollati posano una minaccia severa contro libertà e sicurezza della gente e perfino potrebbero finire nell’inedia di massa e nel genocidio. In un’economia incontrollata per mezzo di „lo stato “là sarebbe attivo dei giocatori che tende al controllo mai maggior del mercato ed ai profitti mai maggiori e più il profitto un giocatore potrebbe fare, il più vigoroso e meno scrupoloso diventerebbe e come si preoccupa non per il benessere ma solamente suo della gente profitto, il risultato sarebbe un grande monopolio con i prezzi per le cose di bisogno fondamentale che il consumatore medio non può pagare.

Gli scienziati economici tedeschi e perfino da altri paesi europei quale la Francia, l’Italia o l’Inghilterra, erano informati che, per raggiungere lo scopo della prosperità nazionale, là ha dovuto essere stabilito un’economia controllata dallo stato per le cose dei bisogni fondamentali, quali l’acqua, l’elettricità, l’alimento, la comunicazione ed il trasporto.

Se state parlando oggi con liberalists economici e fornite questo fatto, denunceranno solitamente tali generi di pensieri per essere marxista del „“, „socialista “o altre parole dure. Inhalated il concetto di libertà totale di ogni movimento economico, particolarmente quella della gente e di soldi. Mentre agiscono in tal modo in oder per fare tacere l’opposizione anche prima che possa sviluppare i suoi pensieri completamente, non potrebbero essere ulteriori dalla verità. Infatti, il concetto della libertà totale del mercato è in sé molto più marxista dell’approccio continentale tradizionale all’economia.

Il liberalismo, mentre domina oggi i dibattiti scientifici e politici, viene da una scuola di pensiero completamente differente che non ha radici nella teoria tradizionale dell’economia nazionale. Coloro che ha formulato gli impianti essenziali sull’economia liberale ha avuto loro esperienza personale non nel campo di lavoro e di rifornimento lavoranti o d’organizzazioni per la gente in certa area ma piuttosto commerciata nel commercio transregionale o nei mercati azionari. Di conseguenza non è una sorpresa che il loro proprio interesse economico viene a dominare la loro costruzione teorica. Questa gente ha trasformato il loro interesse in nessun frontiere per commercio una legge economica centrale del „“, sebbene non fosse legge naturale come la legge di gravità ma richiesta alla legislazione.

Oggi la teoria del „“dei mercati liberi, che è in effetti un modo meravigliosamente senza problemi per globalmente il funzionamento delle preoccupazioni commerciali per guadagnare i gran quantità del profitto, anche osa forzare i flussi fondamentali del „quattro “sopra ogna singolo nazione. Questi flussi sono: Soldi (Investitions dentro e profitti fuori), merci (le risorse naturali DEVONO essere permesse fuori dappertutto, prodotti dentro dappertutto), informazioni (riguardo ai fattori di produzione) e mano d’opera. L’ultima cosa di questi è il più pericoloso di tutti, poichè un flusso libero dei lavoratori attraverso il globo si pianterà sull’intera gente e le forzerà in un sistema senza anima di sfruttamento ed in una massimizzazione dei profitti. Per assicurare questi quattro flussi, la strategia militare degli Stati Uniti considera di stabilire un quinto flusso: quello “dei servizi strategici degli Stati Uniti„, che realmente mezzi: Guerra con ogni nazione che resiste all’implementazione dei flussi.

Dove Marx critica il capitalismo del „“, è sempre questa forma di capitalismo che descrive. Dal punto di vista 19. del secolo in anticipo Germania, questa è per quanto ci sia falso mezzi reali di limitazione e di moderazione dei mercati dalla legislazione imponente a favore di benessere nazionale. La discussione principale di Marx‘ è: In un’economia poichè la descrive, la rivoluzione è una necessità. Ma poichè Marx considera la rivoluzione una necessità comunque, perché le cose non lasciate risultano realmente cattivo per le masse in primo luogo. Di conseguenza i capitalisti più senza scrupoli, i banchieri internazionali ed i marxisti hanno andato di accordo sempre così molto buon per i 150 anni ultimi. I marxisti, infatti, anche sono stormtroopers dei banchieri‘ che fanno il loro lavoro sporco ma necessario.

Il sistema della regola marxista verrà modo, sia via una rivoluzione marxista o come minaccia di strisciamento, poichè è oggi. Nè il liberalismo occidentale nè il marxismo classico condurrà le società europee ed americane da quel movimento di tenaglia. Forse una considerazione delle teorie continentali di lunga data ma a lungo dimenticate dell’economia olistica può fornire un’uscita.

III. Propaganda di guerra

A seguito dell’istituzione di grandi stati-nazione, i grandi eserciti regolari sono stati messi su e per fornire a questi eserciti un senso di cui erano per, gli stati hanno dovuto condurre la propaganda su una maggior scala. I potere occidentali, particolarmente Gran-Bretagna, hanno avuto molto presto questo punto. La Gran-Bretagna era la forza motrice nel encirculating la Reich tedesca, poichè, dalla posizione di no. 1, era impaurita di tutto il concurrent possibilmente che aumenta sul continente. Per preparare propagandistically una guerra contro la Germania, il Tavistock Institute del „con relazioni umane “è stato fondato. Mai sentito parlare? Ed ha luogo ancora in atto, per 100 anni ora. Questo istituto instrumentalized la diffamazione, l’infamia e le bugie per la causa di demonizzare la Germania come gente.

Per ottenere i legami di guerra ha venduto ai cittadini britannici semplici per il finanziamento delle misure della guerra della Gran-Bretagna, l’istituto installato in loro manifesti della propaganda l’idea della Germania che punta che conquista l’intero mondo e che asservisce Britanni. Hanno sparso le bugie dei soldati tedeschi che tagliano mani dei bambini‘, colza le suore belghe e trasformanti i soldati britannici caduti nell’alimento dei maiali – anche in WWI!

C’è questa persona nominata Edward Bernays. Era un ebreo americano, un nipote a Sigmund Freud. Poichè la rete ebrea ha voluto l’America aderire alle forze con la Gran-Bretagna contro la Germania, Bernays è andato in Gran-Bretagna ed ha funzionato nel Tavistock Institute con lo scopo di propagandare fino alla gente americana finché non credessero la guerra contro la Germania, a cui gli Stati Uniti non hanno confinato ed a cui non ha posato mai una minaccia diretta contro, era una necessità. Potete pensare ad un maggior atto del tradimento che entrando la vostra patria in una guerra a favore di un potere straniero, senza l’interesse minimo per se stesso? Dopo che la guerra si era conclusa, Bernays instrumentalized alcune delle tecniche propagandistic per la pubblicità e per le campagne pubbliche, che sono stato conosciute come le pubbliche relazioni.

La Germania non ha avuta niente mettere contro questa perfidia. Ha provato a presentare i fatti e le figure circa formazione nazionale, spesa per le forze armate e la quantità di navi di guerra costruite per invalidare le accuse di essere „barbaro “, „alla ricerca di guerra “o militarista del „“. Purtroppo, la verità circa questi argomenti è soltanto presentabile come numeri ed i manifesti della propaganda che presentano i numeri non sono molto presunti prendere occhi della gente‘ e portare in soldi dai legami di guerra. Soltanto il del 1917, i tedeschi hanno fatto il loro primo manifesto solo immagine della propaganda, mostrante un soldato con il siegen dei uns di Helft del „di parole “(aiutici vittoria). Ha sollevato dieci volte il risultato dei manifesti precedenti. Tragicamente, prima che la Germania perdesse WWI militarically, ha perso propagandistically la guerra.

E questa tragedia anche ripetuta in WWII, come la Germania aveva ricavato le conseguenze dal disastro della propaganda in WWI. I rami propagandistic degli alleati di Goebbels‘ il ministero per il chiarimento pubblico e la propaganda, che successivamente è stata demonizzata come dire le bugie malfamate, aveva trovato realmente appena un modo di mettere le cose nei titoli orecchiabili mentre‘ hanno sparso le bugie ancor più diaboliche sopra il mondo. Purtroppo, il potere che si è trovato molto più di meno perso ancora e poi è stato incolpato di tutti i peccati ogni potere di combattimento aveva commesso. Cerchi appena il nome di Ilja Ehrenburg se volete sapere di che genere la propaganda di guerra degli alleati‘ era.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Cuatro tesis en Alemania y el oeste

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Traducción automática. No nos hacemos responsables de errores de traducción.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

por Schattenkoenig

Para prepararse para una entrevista con Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig resolvió en inglés los pensamientos siguientes para destacar algunos aspectos cruciales de la situación de Alemania (y, generalmente el oeste).

I. El concepto alemán de Geopolitik

El término describe un esquema de las estrategias políticas globales centradas en el Reich alemán y fundadas en la tradición de las visiónes holísticas que habían dominado el pensamiento alemán desde las Edades Medias, cuando el Reich (Sacro Imperio Romano de la nación germánica) había formado una clase de apoyo que ordenaba para las naciones que mantuvieron su autonomía y carácter nacional. En la nueva edad, un punto de vista más genético fue establecido, dando respecto caracteres a diversa gente los‘.

El más importante parece a mí el arraigo del alemán Geopolitik en una perspectiva científica y racional ganada de qué se da naturalmente. Piensa en la gente a partir de cuál son realmente y de cuáles son sus potenciales realistas, en vez de formar a gente según una cierta ideología utópica que sea inadecuada para la realidad. Los poderes victoriosos sobre Alemania en 1945 desafortunadamente seguían conceptos ideológicos y tenían poco respecto por las condiciones naturales de la gente‘. Si la realidad hace sus opiniones utópicas fallar, peor hacen que resulta para la realidad que son forzadas al cambio del „“- hasta todo el mundo despiertan en una nueva Unión Soviética totalitaria y globo-que atraviesa sin la libertad dejada para hablar hacia fuera los hechos.

Geopolitik era plenamente consciente del hecho de que había poderes en el mundo que tenía como objetivo erigiendo un sistema totalitario y artificial tan global. Los intelectuales alemanes habían reconocido completamente capitalismo y marxismo liberales occidentales como dos lados de una medalla o, en de una mejor analogía, de dos brazos en un movimiento de tenazas con el objetivo de abrumar todas las naciones y de mezclarlas en un sistema económico de mundo. Geopolitik era una teoría defensiva contra estas tentativas emprendidas por Francia, Gran Bretaña y, más adelante, por la Unión Soviética.

El ideal de la geopolítica alemana era la nación orgánica del „“, definió como a la gente físicamente, moral y económicamente sana que explotaba óptimo sus potenciales dados. La economía nacional debía ser salvaguardada de dependencia a los intereses exteriores, por lo tanto un esfuerzo para la autarquía del „“fue adoptado. Una nación que puede producir todo él necesita y consume dentro de sus huéspedes guardados es menos probable ser chantajeada o ser sofocada en caso de conflicto.

Este concepto era ya una motivación fuerte antes de Primera Guerra Mundial, y los socialistas nacionales añadieron el concepto de pureza racial del „“mientras que creyeron el carácter de una gente e incluso de sus decisiones políticas determinated por su genética. Esto también llevó a los errores no recuperables, e.g mientras que esperaron que Inglaterra fuera un aliado natural contra Francia y Rusia. No habrían podido ser más futuras de qué entonces sucedió realmente, pues Gran Bretaña (y también los E.E.U.U.) fueron minados y derribados totalmente por un poder clandestino capaz de dominar a una gente totalmente, económicamente y mentalmente.

Mientras que la gente alemana todavía estaba en crecimiento demográfico en ese entonces el concepto fue desarrollado, y Alemania tenía ya una alta densidad demográfica, el concepto importancia ganada de Lebensraum del „“. Incluso la idea que una nación más pequeña que no tenía ninguna oportunidad de ganar autarquía y fuerza en sus los propio fuera desaparecer y llevar a su mayor vecino parece haber subido de los conceptos más tempranos, y fue popularizada solamente por Hitler y los socialistas nacionales como clase de darwinismo social de naciones. El concepto no tiene nada hacer con genocidios o gente del exterminio a favor de otro, pero como había una teoría en la cual los países tienen gusto de Bélgica, Luxemburgo o Polonia no tenía ninguna perspectiva de la existencia mucho más de largo, parece no más una cosa grande para limpiarla del mapa deliberadamente y para someter a su gente al dominio alemán.

El Geopolitik también tenía poco respecto por fronteras existentes debido a la condición natural de Alemania que no tenía ningún límite natural y por lo tanto que estaba conforme a intrusiones extranjeras durante siglos (e.g los treinta años‘ de guerra). El único huésped del interés era el „Volksgrenze “, que fue permitido ampliarse, también llevando a los medios militares, si la gente alemana se amplió continuamente.

II. Concepto alemán y occidental de ciencia económica

De una manera similar como Geopolitik, la opinión alemana sobre la economía era integrada y holística. Había sido siempre un consenso, incluso más allá del huésped alemán, que los mercados totalmente incontrolados plantean una amenaza severa para la libertad y la seguridad de la gente e incluso pudieron terminar para arriba en el hambre total y el genocidio. En una economía incontrolada mediante „el estado “allí sería el apuntar activo de los jugadores al control siempre mayor del mercado y a beneficios siempre mayores, y más el beneficio un jugador podría hacer, el más poderoso y menos escrupuloso él se convirtió, y como él cuida no para el bienestar pero solamente el suyo de la gente beneficio, el resultado sería un monopolio grande con los precios para las cosas de la necesidad básica que el consumidor medio no puede pagar.

Los científicos económicos alemanes, e incluso de otros países europeos tales como Francia, Italia o Inglaterra, eran conscientes que, para alcanzar la meta de la prosperidad nacional, allí tuvo que ser establecido una economía controlada por el Estado para las cosas de necesidades básicas, tales como agua, electricidad, comida, comunicación y transporte.

Si usted está hablando con los liberalists económicos hoy y sube con este hecho, denunciarán generalmente tales clases de pensamientos para ser marxista del „“, „socialista “u otras palabras fuertes. Inhalated el concepto de libertad total de cada movimiento económico, especialmente de la de gente y de dinero. Mientras que hacen tan en oder para silenciar la oposición incluso antes de que puede desarrollar sus pensamientos totalmente, no podrían ser más futuros de la verdad. De hecho, el concepto de libertad total del mercado está en sí mismo mucho más marxista que el acercamiento continental tradicional a la economía.

El liberalismo, mientras que domina discusiones científicos y políticos hoy, viene de una escuela de pensamiento totalmente diversa que no tenga ninguna raíz en la teoría tradicional de la economía nacional. Los que formularon los trabajos esenciales sobre economía liberal tenían su experiencia personal no en el campo del trabajo y de la fuente de trabajo o de organización para la gente en cierta área pero tratada bastante en comercio transregional o en mercados de acción. Por lo tanto no es una sorpresa que su propio interés económico viene dominar su edificio teórico. Esta gente hizo su interés en ningunos límites para el comercio en una ley económica central del „“, aunque no sea ningún derecho natural como la ley de la gravedad sino demanda a la legislación.

La teoría del „“de mercados libres, que es de hecho una manera maravillosamente aproblemática para global actuar las preocupaciones comerciales para ganar enormes cantidades de beneficio, incluso se atreve hoy a forzar los flujos fundamentales del „cuatro “sobre cada nación. Estos flujos son: Dinero (Investitions adentro y beneficios hacia fuera), mercancías (los recursos naturales SE DEBEN permitir hacia fuera por todas partes, productos adentro por todas partes), información (respecto a factores de producción) y mano de obra. La cosa pasada de éstos es la más peligrosa de todos, pues un libre flujo de trabajadores a través del globo arraigará encima de gente entera y la forzará en un sistema desalmado de explotación y la maximización de beneficios. Para asegurar estos cuatro flujos, la estrategia militar de los E.E.U.U. considera para establecer un quinto flujo: el de los “servicios estratégicos de los E.E.U.U.”, que realmente medios: Guerra en cada nación que resiste la puesta en práctica de los flujos.

Donde Marx critica capitalismo del „“, es siempre esta forma de capitalismo que él describe. Desde la perspectiva 19. del siglo temprano Alemania, ésta es tan falso que había medios reales de limitar y de moderar mercados por la legislación imponente a favor de bienestar nacional. La discusión principal de Marx‘ es: En una economía como él la describe, la revolución es una necesidad. Pero como Marx considera la revolución una necesidad de todos modos, porqué las cosas no dejadas resultan realmente malo para las masas primero. Por lo tanto los capitalistas más sin escrúpulos, los banqueros internacionales y los marxistas conseguidos siempre a lo largo tan de muy bueno por los 150 años pasados. Los marxistas, de hecho, incluso son stormtroopers de los banqueros los‘ que hacen su trabajo sucio pero necesario.

El sistema de regla marxista vendrá manera, sea vía una revolución marxista o como una amenaza del arrastramiento, pues es hoy. Ni el liberalismo occidental ni el marxismo clásico llevará a sociedades europeas y americanas fuera de ese movimiento de tenazas. Quizá una consideración de las teorías continentales establecidas desde hace tiempo pero largo-olvidadas de la economía holística puede proporcionar una salida.

III. Propaganda de la guerra

Después del establecimiento de grandes naciones estado, pusieron a los grandes ejércitos derechos, y para proporcionar a estos ejércitos un sentido para de cuál estaban, los estados tuvieron que conducir propaganda en una mayor escala. Los poderes occidentales, especialmente Gran Bretaña, tuvieron este punto muy temprano. Gran Bretaña era la fuerza impulsora en encirculating el Reich alemán, pues, de la posición de no. 1, tenía miedo del concurrente que subía posiblemente en el continente. Para preparar una guerra contra Alemania propagandista, el Tavistock Institute del „en relaciones humanas “fue fundado. ¿Nunca oído hablar le? Y ahora todavía está en existencia, por 100 años. Este instituto instrumentalized la difamación, la infamia y las mentiras para la causa de demonizing Alemania como gente.

Para conseguir enlaces de guerra vendió a los ciudadanos británicos simples para financiar las medidas de la guerra de Gran Bretaña, el instituto puesto en sus carteles de la propaganda la idea de Alemania que tenía como objetivo que conquistaba el mundo entero y que esclavizaba a británico. ¡Separaron las mentiras de los soldados alemanes que cortaban manos a los bebés las‘, violando a monjas belgas y procesando a soldados británicos caidos en la comida de los cerdos – incluso en WWI!

Hay esta persona nombrada Edward Bernays. Él era un judío americano, sobrino a Sigmund Freud. Pues la red judía quisiera que América se uniera a fuerzas con Gran Bretaña contra Alemania, Bernays fue a Gran Bretaña y trabajó en el Tavistock Institute con el objetivo de hacer propaganda de a la gente americana hasta que ella creyera guerra contra Alemania, a la cual los E.E.U.U. no confinaron y a la cual nunca planteó una amenaza directa para ella, era una necesidad. ¿Puede usted pensar en un mayor acto de la traición que consiguiendo su patria en una guerra a favor de un poder extranjero, sin el interés más leve para sí mismo? Después de que la guerra hubiera terminado, Bernays instrumentalized algunas de las técnicas propagandistas para hacer publicidad y para las campañas públicas, que se conocían como relaciones públicas.

Alemania no tenía nada fijar contra esta perfidia. Intentó presentar los hechos y las figuras sobre la educación nacional, el gasto para las fuerzas armadas de arma y la cantidad de naves de guerra construidas para invalidar las acusaciones de ser „brutal “, guerra-buscar del „“o militarista del „“. Desafortunadamente, la verdad sobre estos temas es solamente presentable como números, y los carteles de la propaganda que presentan números no son muy supuestos coger ojos a la gente los‘ y traerla en dinero de enlaces de guerra. Solamente 1917, los alemanes hicieron su primer cartel de la propaganda de la imagen-solamente, mostrando a un soldado con el siegen de los uns de Helft del „de las palabras “(ayúdenos triunfo). Aumentó diez veces el resultado de los carteles anteriores. Trágico, antes de que Alemania perdiera WWI militarically, perdió la guerra propagandista.

Y esta tragedia incluso repetida en WWII, como Alemania había extraído consecuencias del desastre de la propaganda en WWI. Las ramas propagandistas de los aliados de Goebbels el‘ ministerio de la aclaración pública y de la propaganda, que demonized posteriormente como decir mentiras infames, realmente acababa de encontrar una manera de poner cosas en títulos pegadizos mientras que‘ separaron mentiras aún más diabólicas sobre el mundo. Desafortunadamente, el poder que mintió perdido mucho menos otra vez y después fue culpado por todos los pecados cada poder que luchaba había confiado. Apenas mire para arriba el nombre de Ilja Ehrenburg si usted quiere saber de qué clase propaganda de la guerra de los aliados era la‘.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Quatro teses em Alemanha e no oeste

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Tradução de máquina. Não se responsabiliza por erros de tradução.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

por Schattenkoenig

Para preparar-se para uma entrevista com Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig dou certo em inglês os seguintes pensamentos para destacar alguns aspectos cruciais da situação de Alemanha (e, geralmente, o oeste).

I. O conceito alemão de Geopolitik

O termo descreve um esboço das estratégias políticas globais centradas no Reich alemão e fundadas na tradição das vistas holísticas que tinham dominado o pensamento alemão desde a Idade Média, quando o Reich (império romano santamente da nação germânica) tinha formado um tipo da cinta pedindo para as nações que mantiveram seus autonomia e caráter nacional. Na idade nova, um ponto de vista mais genético foi estabelecido, dando o respeito caráteres aos povos diferentes‘.

O mais importante parece-me o enraizamento do alemão Geopolitik em uma perspectiva científica e racional ganhada do que é dado naturalmente. Pensa dos povos até à data do que são realmente e de quais seus potenciais realísticos são, em vez de formar povos de acordo com alguma ideologia visionária que é inadequada para a realidade. Os poderes vitoriosos sobre Alemanha em 1945 infelizmente seguiam conceitos ideológicos e tiveram pouco respeito para condições naturais dos povos‘. Se a realidade faz com que suas opiniões visionárias falhem, mais mal o fazem despejar para a realidade que estarão forçadas à mudança do „“- até todo o mundo acordarão em uma União Soviética totalitário e globo-medindo nova sem a liberdade deixada para falar para fora os ternos.

Geopolitik era plenamente consciente do terno de que havia uns poderes no mundo que visa erigindo um sistema totalitário e artificial tão global. Os intelectuais alemães tinham reconhecido inteiramente o capitalismo e o marxismo liberais ocidentais como dois lados de uma medalha ou, em uma analogia melhor, em dois braços em um movimento de quela com o objectivo de oprimir todas as nações e de misturá-las em um sistema económico do mundo. Geopolitik era uma teoria defensiva contra estas tentativas empreendidas por França, Grâ Bretanha e, mais atrasado, pela União Soviética.

O ideal da geopolítica alemão era a nação orgânica do „“, definia como os povos fisicamente, moral e economicamente saudáveis que realizam óptima seus potenciais dados. A economia nacional devia ser protegida da dependência aos interesses externos, conseqüentemente um esforço para a autarcia do „“foi adotado. Uma nação que possa produzir tudo ele precisa e consome dentro de seus pensionistas guardados é menos provável ser feita chantagem ou reprimido em caso do conflito.

Este conceito era já uma motivação forte antes da Primeira Guerra Mundial, e os socialistas nacionais adicionaram o conceito da pureza racial do „“enquanto acreditaram o caráter de um pessoa e mesmo de suas decisões políticas que estão sendo determinated por sua genética. Isto igualmente conduziu aos erros fatais, por exemplo enquanto esperaram Inglaterra ser um aliado natural contra França e Rússia. Não poderiam ter sido mais adicionais do que então aconteceu realmente, porque Grâ Bretanha (e igualmente os E.U.) completamente foram minados e subvertidos por um poder clandestino capaz de dominar um pessoa totalmente, economicamente e mentalmente.

Enquanto o pessoa alemão estava ainda no crescimento demográfico naquele tempo o conceito foi desenvolvido, e Alemanha já teve uma densidade populacional alta, o conceito importância ganhada de Lebensraum do „“. Mesmo a ideia que uma nação menor que não tenha nenhuma oportunidade de ganhar a autarcia e a força no seus próprios seja desaparecer e levar a seu maior vizinho parece ter aumentado dos conceitos os mais adiantados, e foi popularizada somente por Hitler e pelos socialistas nacionais como um tipo do darwinismo social das nações. O conceito não não tem nada fazer com genocídios ou povos da exterminação em favor de um outro, mas como havia uma teoria em que os países gostam de Bélgica, Luxemburgo ou o Polônia não tiveram nenhuma perspectiva da existência muito mais por muito tempo, parece já não uma coisa grande para limpá-la deliberadamente fora do mapa e para conter seus povos à autoridade alemão.

O Geopolitik igualmente teve pouco respeito para beiras existentes devido à condição natural de Alemanha que não tem nenhum limite natural e conseqüentemente que é sujeita às intrusões estrangeiras há séculos (por exemplo os trinta anos‘ da guerra). O único pensionista do interesse era o „Volksgrenze “, que foi permitido expandir, igualmente levando aos meios militares, se os povos alemães expandiram continuamente.

II. Conceito alemão e ocidental da ciência econômica

Em uma maneira similar como Geopolitik, a vista alemão na economia era integrada e holística. Tinha sido sempre um consenso, mesmo além do pensionista alemão, que os mercados totalmente descontrolados levantam uma ameaça severa à liberdade e à segurança dos povos e mesmo puderam terminar acima na inanição maciça e no genocídio. Em uma economia descontrolada por meio do „o estado “lá seria apontar ativo dos jogadores ao controle sempre maior do mercado e aos lucros sempre maiores, e mais o lucro um jogador poderia fazer, o mais poderoso e menos escrupuloso tornar-se-ia, e como se importa não com o bem-estar mas unicamente o seu do pessoa lucro, o resultado seria um monopólio grande com preços para coisas da necessidade que básica o consumidor médio é incapaz de pagar.

Os cientistas econômicos alemães, e mesmo de outros países europeus tais como França, Itália ou Inglaterra, estavam cientes que, a fim alcançar o objetivo da prosperidade nacional, lá teve que ser estabelecido uma economia controlada pelo Estado para coisas de necessidades básicas, tais como a água, a eletricidade, o alimento, a comunicação e o transporte.

Se você está falando aos liberalists econômicos hoje e vem acima com este terno, delatarão geralmente tais tipos dos pensamentos para ser marxista do „“, „socialista “ou outras palavras duras. Inhalated o conceito da liberdade total de cada movimento econômico, especialmente de que dos povos e dinheiro. Quando fizerem assim em oder para silenciar a oposição mesmo antes que possa desenvolver seus pensamentos completamente, não poderiam ser mais adicionais da verdade. De fato, o conceito da liberdade total do mercado é em si mesmo muito mais marxista do que a aproximação continental tradicional à economia.

O liberalismo, enquanto domina debates científicos e políticos hoje, vem de uma escola de pensamento completamente diferente que não tem nenhuma raiz na teoria tradicional da economia nacional. Aqueles que formularam os trabalhos essenciais na economia liberal tiveram sua experiência pessoal não no campo do trabalho e da fonte de trabalho ou de organização para os povos em alguma área mas negociados um pouco no comércio transregional ou em mercados de valores de ação. Conseqüentemente não é uma surpresa que seu próprio interesse económico vem dominar sua construção teórica. Estes povos fizeram seu interesse em nenhuns limites para o comércio em uma lei econômica central do „“, embora não fosse nenhuma lei natural como a lei de gravidade mas uma procura à legislação.

Hoje a teoria do „“de mercados livres, que é de fato uma maneira maravilhosamente sem problemas para global operar os interesses de comércio para ganhar enormes quantidade do lucro, ousa mesmo forçar os fluxos fundamentais do „quatro “em cima de cada única nação. Estes fluxos são: Dinheiro (Investitions dentro e lucros para fora), bens (os recursos naturais DEVEM ser permitidos para fora em toda parte, produtos dentro em toda parte), informação (a respeito dos fatores de produção) e mão-de-obra. A última coisa destes é a mais perigosa de tudo, porque um fluxo livre dos trabalhadores através do globo enraizará acima dos povos inteiros e os forçará em um sistema desalmado de exploração e no máximo de lucros. Para fixar estes quatro fluxos, a estratégia militar dos E.U. considera para estabelecer um quinto fluxo: isso dos “dos serviços estratégicos E.U.”, que realmente meios: Guerra em cada nação que resiste a aplicação dos fluxos.

Onde Marx critica o capitalismo do „“, é sempre este formulário do capitalismo que descreve. Da perspectiva 19. do século adiantado Alemanha, esta é por mais falso que houvesse uns meios reais de limitar e de moderar mercados por legislação imponente em favor do bem-estar nacional. O argumento principal de Marx‘ é: Em uma economia como a descreve, a revolução é uma necessidade. Mas como Marx considera a revolução uma necessidade de qualquer maneira, porque as coisas não deixadas despejam realmente mau para as massas primeiramente. Conseqüentemente os capitalistas os mais sem escrúpulos, os banqueiros internacionais e os marxista obtidos sempre ao longo tão de muito bom pelos últimos 150 anos. Os marxista, de fato, são mesmo os stormtroopers dos banqueiros‘ que fazem seu trabalho sujo mas necessário.

O sistema de regra marxista virá de qualquer maneira, seja ele através de uma revolução marxista ou como uma ameaça do rastejamento, porque é hoje. Nem o liberalismo ocidental nem o marxismo clássico conduzirão sociedades européias e americanas fora desse movimento de quela. Talvez uma consideração das teorias continentais estabelecidos há muito tempo mas longo-esquecidas da economia holística pode fornecer uma maneira para fora.

III. Propaganda da guerra

Depois do estabelecimento de grandes estados-nação, os grandes exércitos eretos foram colocados, e a fim fornecer a estes exércitos um sentido do que fossem para, os estados tiveram que conduzir a propaganda em uma escala maior. Os poderes ocidentais, especialmente Grâ Bretanha, tinham obtido este ponto muito cedo. Grâ Bretanha era a força motriz em encirculating o Reich alemão, porque, da posição do no. 1, estava receosa do concurrent que aumenta possivelmente no continente. A fim preparar propagandistically uma guerra contra Alemanha, o Tavistock Institute do „em relações humanas “foi fundado. Ouvido nunca lhe? E realiza-se ainda na existência, por 100 anos agora. Este instituto instrumentalized a difamação, o infâmia e as mentiras para a causa de demonizing Alemanha como um pessoa.

A fim obter ligações de guerra vendeu aos cidadãos britânicos simples financiando medidas da guerra de Grâ Bretanha, instituto estabelecido em seus cartazes da propaganda a ideia de Alemanha que visa que conquista o mundo inteiro e que subjuga Britânicos. Espalharam as mentiras dos soldados alemães que eliminam as mãos dos bebês‘, violando freiras belgas e processando soldados britânicos caídos no alimento dos suínos – mesmo em WWI!

Há esta pessoa nomeada Edward Bernays. Era um judeu americano, um sobrinho a Sigmund Freud. Porque a rede judaica quis América aderir a forças com a Grâ Bretanha contra Alemanha, Bernays foi a Grâ Bretanha e trabalhou no Tavistock Institute com o objectivo de propagandizing até os povos americanos até que acreditaram a guerra contra Alemanha, a que os E.U. não limitaram e a que nunca levantou uma ameaça direta a ela, era uma necessidade. Pode você pensar de um ato maior da traição do que obtendo sua pátria em uma guerra em favor de um poder estrangeiro, sem o mais leve interesse para se? Depois que a guerra tinha terminado, Bernays instrumentalized algumas das técnicas propagandistic para anunciar e para as campanhas públicas, que se tornaram conhecidas como relações públicas.

Alemanha não não teve nada ajustar-se contra este perfidy. Tentou apresentar os ternos e as figuras sobre a educação nacional, a despesa para as forças armadas e a quantidade de navios de guerra construídos para invalidar as acusações de ser „bárbaro “, guerra-procurar do „“ou o militarista do „“. Infelizmente, a verdade sobre estes assuntos é somente apresentável como números, e os cartazes da propaganda que apresentam números não são muito supostos travar os olhos dos povos‘ e trazê-los no dinheiro das ligações de guerra. Somente 1917, os alemães fizeram seu primeiro cartaz da propaganda da imagem-somente, mostrando um soldado com o siegen dos uns de Helft do „das palavras “(nos ajude vitória). Levantou dez vezes o resultado dos cartazes precedentes. Tràgica, antes que Alemanha perdeu WWI militarically, perdeu a guerra propagandistically.

E esta tragédia repetida mesmo em WWII, como Alemanha tinha selecionado conseqüências do desastre da propaganda em WWI. Os ramos propagandistic dos aliados de Goebbels‘ o ministério para a iluminação pública e a propaganda, que subseqüentemente demonized como dizer mentiras infames, tinha encontrado realmente apenas uma maneira de pôr coisas em título atrativos quando‘ espalharam mentiras ainda mais diabólicas sobre o mundo. Infelizmente, o poder que se encontrou perdido muito menos outra vez e foi responsabilizado então por todos os pecados cada poder de combate tinha cometido. Apenas olhe acima o nome de Ilja Ehrenburg se você quer saber de que tipo a propaganda da guerra dos aliados‘ era.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Vier Theses op Duitsland en het Westen

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Machine vertaling. Geen enkele aansprakelijkheid voor vertaalfouten.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

door Schattenkoenig

Die voor een gesprek met Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig voorbereidingen treffen in het Engels de volgende gedachten wordt uitgewerkt om sommige essentiële aspecten de situatie van van Duitsland (en, in het algemeen, het Westen) te benadrukken.

I. Het Duitse concept Geopolitik

De termijn beschrijft een overzicht van globale politieke die strategieën op het Duitse die Duitse Rijk worden gericht en in de traditie van holistic meningen worden opgericht die het Duitse denken sinds de Middeleeuwen hadden overheerst, toen het Duitse Rijk (Heilig Roman Imperium van Germaanse Natie) een soort het opdracht geven van tot steun voor naties had gevormd die hun autonomie en nationaal karakter handhaafden. In de nieuwe leeftijd, werd een genetischer gezichtspunt gevestigd, gevend eerbied aan verschillende volkeren‘ karakters.

Het belangrijkst schijnt aan me het wortel schieten van Duitse Geopolitik in een wetenschappelijk en rationeel bereikt perspectief van wat natuurlijk wordt gegeven. Het denkt aan volkeren vanaf wat zijn zij werkelijk en wat hun realistisch potentieel is, in plaats van het vormen van volkeren volgens één of andere utopian ideologie die voor werkelijkheid ontoereikend is. De bevoegdheden zegevierend over Duitsland in 1945 volgden jammer genoeg ideologische concepten en hadden weinig eerbied voor volkeren‘ natuurlijke voorwaarden. Als de werkelijkheid hun utopian meningen om veroorzaakt te ontbreken, slechter maken zij het voor werkelijkheid blijken die aan verandering „„zal worden gedwongen – tot al wereld in nieuwe totalitair en bol-overspant Sovjetunie zonder vrijheid verlaten om uit de feiten te spreken zal ontwaken.

Geopolitik was zich volledig bewust van het feit dat er bevoegdheden in de wereld strevend naar het oprichten van zulk een globale totalitaire en kunstmatige systeem waren. De Duitse intellectuelen hadden volledig Westelijk Liberaal Kapitalisme en Marxisme als twee kanten van één medaille of, in een betere analogie gezien, twee wapens in een schaarbeweging met het doel om alle naties te overweldigen en hen te mengen in een wereld economisch systeem. Geopolitik was een verdedigingstheorie tegen deze die pogingen door Frankrijk, Groot-Brittannië en, recenter, door de Sovjetunie worden ondernomen.

Ideal van Duits Geo – de politiek was „de organische natie „, als fysisch, moreel en economisch gezonde mensen definieerde die optimaal zijn bepaald potentieel ontsluiten. De nationale economie moest van afhankelijkheid aan uitgaande belangen worden beschermd, daarom streef want de autarkie „„werd goedgekeurd. Een natie die alles kan produceren het vereist en binnen hun bewaakte pensionairs verbruikt zal minder waarschijnlijk om in het geval van conflict worden gechanteerd of worden verstikt.

Dit concept was reeds een sterke motivatie vóór Wereldoorlog I, en de Nazien voegden het concept rassenzuiverheid „toe „aangezien zij het karakter van mensen geloofden en zelfs zijn politieke besluiten die door zijn genetica worden bepaald. Dit leidde ook tot fatale fouten, b.v. aangezien zij Engeland verwachtten dat is een natuurlijke bondgenoot tegen Frankrijk en Rusland. Zij konden niet verder geweest zijn van wat toen werkelijk gebeurde, aangezien Groot-Brittannië (en ook de V.S.) volledig werden ondermijnd en door een heimelijke macht geschikt voor overheersen mensen totaal, economisch en geestelijk werden ontwricht.

Aangezien de Duitse mensen nog in de demografische groei in de tijd waren werd het concept ontwikkeld, en Duitsland had reeds een hoge bevolkingsdichtheid, het concept „bereikt belang „Lebensraum. Zelfs schijnt het idee dat een kleinere natie die geen kans had om autarkie te bereiken en de sterkte op hun aan zijn grotere buur moest verdwijnen en uiting geven om van de vroegste concepten toegenomen te zijn, en slechts door Hitler en de Nazien als een soort sociale darwinism van naties gepopulariseerd. Het concept heeft te doen niets met volkerenmoorden of uitroeiende volkeren ten gunste van een andere één, maar als daar was een theorie waarin de landen zoals België, Luxemburg of Polen geen perspectief van zeer langer het bestaan hadden, schijnt het niet meer een groot ding om hen doelbewust af te vegen van de kaart en hun volkeren te onderwerpen aan Duitse heerschappij.

Geopolitik had ook weinig eerbied voor bestaande grenzen wegens de natuurlijke voorwaarde van geen natuurlijke grenzen hebben en daarom Duitsland die onderworpen aan buitenlands binnendringen eeuwenlang zijn geweest (b.v. de Dertig Jaar‘ van de Oorlog). De enige pensionair van belang was „Volksgrenze „, die om zich werd toegestaan uit te breiden, ook uiting gevend aan militaire middelen, als de Duitse mensen zich voortdurend uitbreidden.

II. Duits en Westelijk concept economische wetenschap

Op een gelijkaardige manier als Geopolitik, was de Duitse mening over economie geïntegreerd en holistic. Het was altijd een consensus, zelfs voorbij de Duitse pensionair geweest, dat de totaal ongecontroleerde markten vormen een strenge bedreiging voor vrijheid en veiligheid van volkeren en zelfs omhoog in massaverhongering en volkerenmoord zouden kunnen beëindigen. In een economie ongecontroleerd door middel van „de staat „er zou spelers het actieve streven aan steeds grotere controle van de markt en aan steeds grotere winsten, en de meer winst zijn een speler zou kunnen maken, machtiger en minder gewetensvol zou hij, en aangezien hij niet voor het zijn winst van de mensen welzijn maar alleen geeft, het resultaat zou zijn een groot monopolie met prijzen voor dingen van basisbehoefte worden de gemiddelde consument niet kan betalen.

De Duitse economische wetenschappers, en zelfs van andere Europese landen zoals Frankrijk, Italië of Engeland, waren zich ervan bewust dat om het doel van nationale welvaart te bereiken, daar een state-controlled economie voor dingen van basisbehoeften, zoals water, elektriciteit, voedsel, mededeling en vervoer moest worden gevestigd.

Als u aan economische liberalists vandaag spreekt en met dit feit op de proppen komt, zullen zij gewoonlijk dergelijke soorten gedachten om marxist „„, socialist „„of andere ruwe woorden aan de kaak stellen te zijn. Zij hebben inhalated het concept totale vrijheid van elk economisch verkeer, vooral dat van volkeren en geld. Terwijl zij dit in Oder aan stilteoppositie doen zelfs alvorens het zijn gedachten kan ontwikkelen volledig, konden zij niet van de waarheid verder zijn. In feite, is het concept totale marktvrijheid op zichzelf veel meer Marxist dan de traditionele continentale benadering van economie.

Het liberalisme, aangezien het wetenschappelijke en politieke debatten vandaag overheerst, komt uit een volledig verschillende school van gedachte die geen wortels in de traditionele theorie van nationale economie heeft. Zij die de essentiële werkzaamheden aangaande liberale economie formuleerden hadden hun persoonlijke ervaring niet op het gebied van het werken van of het organiseren van het werk en levering voor de mensen op een bepaald gebied maar behandelden eerder in transregional handel of in effectenbeurzen. Daarom is het geen verrassing dat hun eigen economische rente komt om de hun theoretische bouw te overheersen. Deze mensen maakten hun rente in geen grenzen voor handel in een centrale economische „-wet „, hoewel het geen natuurlijke wet als Wet van ernst maar vraag aan de wetgeving is.

Vandaag betreft de theorie „„van vrije markten, die in feite een wonderfully unproblematic manier voor globaal werkende handel is reusachtige hoeveelheden winst te bereiken, durft zelfs om „vier te dwingen fundamentele stromen „op elke enige natie. Deze stromen zijn: Geld (Investitions binnen en Winsten uit), Goederen (de Natuurlijke rijkdommen MOETEN uit overal worden toegestaan, Producten in overal), Informatie (betreffende productiefactoren) en Aantal arbeidskrachten. Het laatste ding hiervan is het gevaarlijkst van allen, aangezien een vrije stroom van arbeiders over de bol omhoog volledige volkeren wortel zal schieten en hen in een zielloos systeem van benutting en maximalisering van winsten zal dwingen. Om deze vier stromen te beveiligen, denkt de militaire strategie van de V.S. na om een vijfde stroom te vestigen: dat van „de Strategische Diensten van de V.S.“, wat eigenlijk betekent: Oorlog op elke natie die tegen de implementatie van de stromen verzetten zich.

Waar Marx Kapitalisme „„kritiseert, is het altijd deze vorm van kapitalisme dat hij heeft beschreven. Vanuit het perspectief van vroege 19. eeuw Duitsland, is dit onwaar aangezien er daadwerkelijke middelen om waren markten te beperken en te matigen door de wetgeving ten gunste van nationaal welzijn op te leggen. Hoofdargument van Marx het‘ is: In een economie aangezien hij het beschrijft, is de revolutie een noodzaak. Maar aangezien Marx als revolutie een noodzaak hoe dan ook, waarom dingen niet laten werkelijk slecht voor de massa’s eerst blijken beschouwt. Daarom werden de meest gewetenloze kapitalisten, de internationale bankiers en de Marxisten altijd langs zo zeer goed voor de laatste 150 jaar. De marxisten, in feite, zelfs zijn de bankiers‘ stormtroopers die hun vuil maar noodzakelijk werk doen.

Het marxistische systeem van regel zal of manier, zij het via een Marxistische revolutie of als kruipende dreiging komen, aangezien het vandaag is. Noch zal het Westelijke liberalisme noch het klassieke Marxisme de Europese en Amerikaanse maatschappijen uit die schaarbeweging leiden. Misschien kan een overweging van de sinds lang gevestigde maar lang-vergeten continentale theorieën van holistic economie een uitweg verstrekken.

III. de Propaganda van de oorlog

Na de totstandbrenging van grote natiestaten, werden de grote bevindende legers, en opgezet om aan deze legers een betekenis te verstrekken van wat waren zij voor, moesten de staten propaganda op grotere schaal leiden. De westelijke bevoegdheden, vooral Groot-Brittannië, hadden zeer vroeg dit punt. Groot-Brittannië was de stuwende kracht in het encirculating van het Duitse Duitse Rijk, aangezien het, van de positie van Nr 1, van om het even welke het gezamenlijke misschien toenemen op het Continent bang was. om een oorlog tegen Duitsland voor te bereiden propagandistically, werd het Tavistock Institute „op Menselijke Relaties „opgericht. Ooit vernomen het? En het bestaat nog, 100 jaar nu. Dit instituut instrumentalized belastering, infamie en ligt voor de oorzaak van het demonizing van Duitsland als mensen.

om oorlog te krijgen verkochten de banden aan eenvoudige Britse burgers voor de oorlogsmaatregelen van financierend Groot-Brittannië, de opstelling van het Instituut in hun propagandaaffiches het idee van Duitsland die naar het veroveren van de gehele wereld en het verslaven van Britten streven. Zij spreiden de leugens van Duitse militairen uit die babys‘ afsnijden handen, Belgische nonnen verkrachten en gevallen Britse militairen verwerken in varkensvoedsel – zelfs in WWI!

Er is deze persoon genoemd Edward Bernays. Hij was een Amerikaanse Jood, een neef aan Sigmund Freud. Aangezien het Joodse netwerk Amerika met Groot-Brittannië tegen Duitsland wilde samenwerken, ging Bernays naar Groot-Brittannië en werkte in het Tavistock Institute met het doel van het propagandizing unto de Amerikaanse Mensen tot zij oorlog tegen Duitsland geloofden, wie de V.S. niet grensten aan en dat nooit een directe bedreiging voor het, was een noodzaak vormde. Kunt u aan een grotere handeling van verraad dan krijgend uw geboorteland in een oorlog ten gunste van een buitenlandse macht, zonder de lichtste interesse voor zich denken? Nadat de oorlog had gebeëindigd, instrumentalized Bernays enkele propagandistic technieken om en voor openbare campagnes te adverteren, die Public relations genoemd geworden werden.

Duitsland had niets tegen dit perfidy te plaatsen. Het probeerde om de feiten en de cijfers over nationaal die onderwijs, uitgaven voor de strijdkrachten en de hoeveelheid oorlogsschepen worden gebouwd om de beschuldigingen ongeldig te maken van het zijn barbaarse „„, „oorlog-zoekt „of militarist „„voor te stellen. Jammer genoeg, is de waarheid over deze onderwerpen slechts presentabel als aantallen, en de propagandaaffiches die aantallen voorstellen zijn niet zeer vermeend om volkeren‘ te vangen ogen en in geld van oorlogsbanden te brengen. Slechts vanaf 1917, maakten de Duitsers hun eerste beeld-slechts propagandaaffiche, die een militair met woorden„uns siegen Helft „(help ons winnen) tonen. Het hief tien keer het resultaat van de vorige affiches op. Tragisch, vóór Duitsland verloren WWI militarically, propagandistically verloor het de oorlog.

En deze die tragedie zelfs in WO.II wordt herhaald, aangezien Duitsland gevolgen van de propagandaramp in WWI had getrokken. Het Ministerie van Goebbels‘ voor Openbare Verlichting en Propaganda, die later is geweest demonized aangezien de vertellende beruchte leugens, eigenlijk net een manier hadden gevonden om dingen in boeiende krantekoppen te zetten propagandistic takken terwijl van de Bondgenoten‘ duivelsere leugens over de wereld uitspreidden. Jammer genoeg, de macht die veel minder loog verloor opnieuw en werd toen beschuldigd van alle zonden elke het vechten macht had begaan. Enkel kijk omhoog de naam van Ilja Ehrenburg als u wilt het weten van welke soort de de oorlogspropaganda van de Bondgenoten‘ was.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Quatre thèses sur l’Allemagne et l’ouest

[Machine translation. No liability for translation errors. Traduction automatique. Aucune responsabilité pour des erreurs de traduction.]
Comments in English, please. View original article

par Schattenkoenig

Pour se préparer à une entrevue avec Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig a établi en anglais les pensées suivantes pour accentuer quelques aspects cruciaux de la situation de l’Allemagne (et, généralement l’ouest).

I. Le concept allemand de Geopolitik

Le terme décrit un contour des stratégies politiques globales portées sur le Reich allemand et fondées dans la tradition des vues holistiques qui avaient dominé la pensée allemande depuis les Moyens Âges, quand le Reich (Saint Empire Romain de nation germanique) avait formé un genre de croisillon de commande pour les nations qui ont maintenu leur autonomie et caractère national. Dans le nouvel âge, un point de vue plus génétique a été établi, donnant le respect caractères à différents peuples des‘.

Le plus important semble à moi l’enracinement de l’Allemand Geopolitik dans une perspective scientifique et rationnellement gagnée de ce qui est donné naturellement. Il pense aux peuples en date de ce que sont vraiment ils et de ce que sont leurs potentiels réalistes, au lieu de former des peuples selon une certaine idéologie utopique qui est insuffisante pour la réalité. Les puissances victorieuses au-dessus de l’Allemagne en 1945 malheureusement suivaient des concepts idéologiques et ont eu peu de respect des états naturels pour peuples‘. Si la réalité fait échouer leurs vues utopiques, plus elles le font s’avérer pour mal la réalité qui seront forcées au changement de „« – jusqu’à tout le monde se réveilleront dans une nouvelle Union Soviétique totalitaire et globe-enjambante sans la liberté laissée pour parler les faits.

Geopolitik se rendait entièrement compte du fait qu’il y avait des puissances dans le monde visant érigeant un système totalitaire et artificiel si global. Les intellectuels allemands avaient entièrement identifié le capitalisme et le marxisme libéraux occidentaux en tant que deux côtés d’une médaille ou, dans d’une meilleure analogie, des deux bras dans un mouvement de pince dans le but d’accabler toutes les nations et de les mélanger dans un système économique du monde. Geopolitik était une théorie défensive contre ces tentatives entreprises par la France, Grande-Bretagne et, plus tard, par l‘Union Soviétique.

L’idéal de la géopolitique allemande était la nation organique de „« , a défini en tant que les personnes physiquement, moralement et économiquement en bonne santé réalisant de façon optimale ses potentiels donnés. L’économie nationale devait être sauvegardée de la dépendance aux intérêts extérieurs, donc un essayer d’obtenir l’autarcie de „« a été adopté. Une nation qui peut produire tout il a besoin et consomme chez leurs pensionnaires gardés est moins pour être faite du chantage ou étouffée en cas de conflit.

Ce concept était déjà une motivation forte avant la Première Guerre Mondiale, et les socialistes nationaux ont ajouté le concept de la pureté raciale de „« pendant qu’ils croyaient le caractère d’un peuple et même de ses décisions politiques determinated par sa génétique. Ceci a également mené aux erreurs bloquantes, par exemple pendant qu’ils s’attendaient à ce que l’Angleterre soit un allié naturel contre la France et la Russie. Elles ne pourraient pas avoir été autres de ce qui alors s’est vraiment produit, car la Grande-Bretagne (et également les États-Unis) ont été complètement minés et renversés par une puissance clandestine capable de dominer un peuple totalement, économiquement et mentalement.

Pendant que les personnes allemandes étaient toujours dans la croissance démographique alors le concept a été développé, et l’Allemagne a déjà eu une densité de population élevée, le concept importance gagnée de „de Lebensraum « . Même l’idée qu’une plus petite nation qui n’a eu aucune occasion de gagner l’autarcie et la force sur leurs propres moyens était de disparaître et mener à son plus grand voisin semble avoir monté des premiers concepts, et a été seulement popularisée par Hitler et les socialistes nationaux comme genre de darwinisme social des nations. Le concept n’a rien à faire avec des génocides ou des peuples d’extermination en faveur d’un autre, mais car il y avait une théorie dans laquelle les pays aiment la Belgique, le Luxembourg ou la Pologne n’a eu aucune perspective d’exister beaucoup plus longtemps, ce ne semble plus une grande chose pour les essuyer outre de la carte délibérément et pour soumettre leurs peuples au dominion allemand.

Le Geopolitik a également eu peu de respect pour les frontières existantes en raison de l’état naturel de l’Allemagne n’ayant aucune frontière naturelle et ayant donc été sujette à des intrusions étrangères pendant des siècles (par exemple les trente années‘ de guerre). Le seul pensionnaire d’intérêt était le „Volksgrenze « , qui a été permis d’augmenter, également menant aux moyens militaires, si les personnes allemandes augmentaient continuellement.

II. Concept allemand et occidental de la science économique

D’une manière semblable comme Geopolitik, la position allemande sur des sciences économiques était intégrée et holistique. C’avait toujours été un consensus, même au delà du pensionnaire allemand, que les marchés totalement incontrôlés constituent une menace grave pour la liberté et la sécurité des peuples et même pourraient finir dans la famine généralisée et le génocide. Dans une économie incontrôlée au moyen de „l’état « là serait viser actif de joueurs à un contrôle toujours plus grand du marché et à des bénéfices toujours plus grands, et plus le bénéfice un joueur pourrait faire, le plus puissant et moins scrupuleux il deviendrait, et comme il s’inquiète pas de l’aide sociale mais seulement du sien des personnes bénéfice, le résultat serait un grand monopole avec des prix des choses de besoin fondamental que le consommateur moyen ne peut pas payer.

Les scientifiques économiques allemands, et même d’autres pays européens tels que la France, l’Italie ou l’Angleterre, se rendaient compte que, afin d’atteindre le but de la prospérité nationale, là ait dû être établi une économie contrôlée par l’État pour des choses des besoins fondamentaux, tels que l’eau, l’électricité, la nourriture, la communication et le transport.

Si vous parlez aux liberalists économiques aujourd’hui et proposez ce fait, ils dénonceront habituellement de tels genres de pensées pour être marxiste de „« , „socialiste « ou d’autres mots durs. Ils inhalated le concept de la liberté totale de chaque mouvement économique, particulièrement de celle des peuples et de l’argent. Tandis qu’ils font ainsi dans oder pour faire taire l’opposition même avant qu’elle peut développer ses pensées complètement, elles ne pourraient pas être autres de la vérité. En fait, le concept de la liberté totale du marché est en soi beaucoup plus marxiste que l’approche continentale traditionnelle à l’économie.

Le libéralisme, pendant qu’il domine des discussions scientifiques et politiques aujourd’hui, vient d’une école de pensée complètement différente qui n’a aucune racine dans la théorie traditionnelle de sciences économiques nationales. Ceux qui ont formulé les travaux essentiels sur l’économie libérale ont eu leur expérience personnelle pas dans le domaine du travail et de l’approvisionnement fonctionnants ou de organisations pour les personnes dans un certain secteur mais plutôt occupées de commercial transrégional ou sur les marchés boursiers. Par conséquent ce n’est pas une surprise que leur propre intérêt économique vient pour dominer leur bâtiment théorique. Ces personnes ont transformé leur intérêt pour aucune frontières pour le commerce en loi économique centrale de „« , bien que ce ne soit aucun droit naturel comme loi de la gravité mais demande à la législation.

Aujourd’hui la théorie de „« de marchés libres, qui est en fait une manière merveilleusement sans problème pour actionner globalement les soucis commerciaux pour gagner des montants considérables de bénéfice, ose même forcer les écoulements fondamentaux du „quatre « sur chaque nation simple. Ces écoulements sont : Argent (Investitions dedans et bénéfices), marchandises (ON DOIT permettre des ressources naturelles partout, produits dedans partout), information (au sujet des facteurs de production) et main d’oeuvre. La dernière chose de ces derniers est la plus dangereuse de tous, car une circulation des travailleurs à travers le globe s’enracinera vers le haut des peuples entiers et les forcera dans un système sans coeur de l’exploitation et la maximisation des bénéfices. Pour fixer ces quatre écoulements, la stratégie militaire des États-Unis considère établir un cinquième écoulement : cela « des services stratégiques des États-Unis », qui réellement moyens : Guerre sur chaque nation résistant à l’exécution des écoulements.

Là où Marx critique le capitalisme de „« , c’est toujours cette forme de capitalisme qu’il décrit. De la perspective 19. du siècle tôt Allemagne, ceci est tout faux qu’il y avait des moyens réels de limiter et de modérer des marchés par la législation imposante en faveur d’aide sociale nationale. L’argument principal de Marx‘ est : Dans une économie car il la décrit, la révolution est une nécessité. Mais car Marx considère la révolution une nécessité de toute façon, pourquoi les choses non laissées s’avèrent vraiment mauvais pour les masses d’abord. Par conséquent les capitalistes les plus sans scrupules, les banquiers internationaux et les marxistes toujours obtenus le long tellement très de bon pendant les 150 dernières années. Les marxistes, en fait, sont même stormtroopers des banquiers les‘ qui effectuent leur travail sale mais nécessaire.

Le système de la règle marxiste viendra manière, que ce soit par l’intermédiaire d’une révolution marxiste ou comme menace de rampement, car c’est aujourd’hui. Ni le libéralisme occidental ni le marxisme classique ne mènera les sociétés européennes et américaines hors de ce mouvement de pince. Peut-être une considération des théories continentales existantes depuis longtemps mais oubliées depuis longtemps de sciences économiques holistiques peut fournir une sortie.

III. Propagande de guerre

Après l’établissement de grands états nation, de grandes armées debout ont été mises, et afin de fournir à ces armées un sens pour de ce qu’ils étaient, les états ont dû conduire la propagande sur une plus grande échelle. Les pouvoirs occidentaux, particulièrement Grande-Bretagne, ont eu ce point très tôt. La Grande-Bretagne était la force d’entraînement dans encirculating le Reich allemand, car elle, de la position de no. 1, avait peur du concurrent se levant probablement sur le continent. Afin de préparer une guerre contre l’Allemagne à grand renfort de propagande, le Tavistock Institute de „sur des relations humaines « a été fondé. Jamais entendu parler lui ? Et il est toujours en existence, pendant 100 années maintenant. Cet institut instrumentalized la diffamation, l’infamie et les mensonges pour la cause de demonizing l’Allemagne en tant que peuple.

Afin d’obtenir des titres d’emprunt de guerre s’est vendue aux citoyens britanniques simples pour financer les mesures de la guerre de la Grande-Bretagne, l’institut installé en leurs affiches de propagande l’idée de l’Allemagne visant conquérant le monde entier et asservissant Britanniques. Elles ont écarté les mensonges des soldats allemands mains découpant bébés des‘, violant les nonnes belges et transformant les soldats britanniques tombés en nourriture de porcs – même dans WWI !

Il y a cette personne appelée Edouard Bernays. Il était un juif américain, un neveu à Sigmund Freud. Car le réseau juif a voulu que l’Amérique adhérât à des forces avec la Grande-Bretagne contre l’Allemagne, Bernays est allé en Grande-Bretagne et a fonctionné dans le Tavistock Institute dans le but de la propagation aux personnes américaines jusqu’à ce qu’elles aient cru la guerre contre l’Allemagne, à laquelle les États-Unis n’ont pas encadré et à laquelle n’a jamais constitué une menace directe pour elle, était une nécessité. Pouvez-vous penser à un plus grand acte de trahison qu’entrant votre patrie dans une guerre en faveur d’une puissance étrangère, sans plus léger intérêt pour lui-même ? Après que la guerre ait fini, Bernays instrumentalized certaines des techniques militantes pour annoncer et pour les campagnes publiques, qui sont devenues notoires en tant que relations publiques.

L’Allemagne n’a eu rien à placer contre cette perfidie. Elle a essayé de présenter les faits et les chiffres au sujet de l’éducation nationale, de la dépense les forces armées et de la quantité de bateaux de guerre construits pour infirmer les accusations d’être „barbare « , „qui recherche la guerre « ou militariste de „« . Malheureusement, la vérité au sujet de ces sujets est seulement présentable comme nombres, et les affiches de propagande présentant des nombres ne sont pas très supposées yeux attraper peuples des‘ et les apporter l’argent des titres d’emprunt de guerre. Seulement à partir de 1917, les Allemands ont fait leur première affiche réservée à l’image de propagande, montrant un soldat avec le siegen d’uns de Helft de „de mots « (aidez-nous victoire). Elle a soulevé dix fois le résultat des affiches précédentes. Tragiquement, avant que l’Allemagne ait perdu WWI militarically, elle a perdu la guerre à grand renfort de propagande.

Et cette tragédie même répétée dans WWII, comme l’Allemagne avait tiré des conséquences de la catastrophe de propagande dans WWI. Les branches militantes des alliés de Goebbels le‘ ministère de l’éclaircissement public et de la propagande, qui plus tard demonized en tant que dire des mensonges infâmes, avait réellement juste trouvé une manière de mettre des choses dans les titres entraînants tandis que‘ écartaient des mensonges bien plus diaboliques au-dessus du monde. Malheureusement, la puissance qui s’est trouvée beaucoup moins perdu encore et a été puis blâmée de tous les péchés chaque puissance de combat avait commis. Recherchez juste le nom d’Ilja Ehrenburg si vous voulez savoir de quelle sorte propagande de guerre des alliés la‘ était.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.

Diesen Beitrag weiterlesen »

Four Theses on Germany and the West

by Schattenkoenig

To prepare for an interview with Carolyn Yeager, Schattenkoenig worked out in English the following thoughts to highlight some crucial aspects of Germany’s (and, in general, the West’s) situation.

I. The German concept of Geopolitik

The term describes an outline of global political strategies centered on the German Reich and founded in the tradition of holistic views which had dominated German thinking since the Middle Ages, when the Reich (Holy Roman Empire of Germanic Nation) had formed a kind of ordering brace for nations which maintained their autonomy and national character. In the new age, a more genetic viewpoint was established, giving respect to different peoples’ characters.

Most important seems to me the rooting of German Geopolitik in a scientific and rationally gained perspective of what is given naturally. It thinks of peoples as of what they really are and what their realistic potentials are, instead of forming peoples according to some utopian ideology which is inadequate for reality. The powers victorious over Germany in 1945 were unfortunately following ideological concepts and had little respect for peoples’ natural conditions. If reality causes their utopian views to fail, the worse they make it turn out for reality which will be forced to „change“ – until all the world will wake up in a new totalitarian and globe-spanning Soviet Union with no freedom left to speak out the facts.

Geopolitik was fully aware of the fact that there were powers in the world aiming at erecting such a global totalitarian and artificial system. The German intellectuals had fully recognized Western Liberal Capitalism and Marxism as two sides of one medal or, in a better analogy, two arms in a pincer movement with the goal of overwhelming all nations and blending them into a world economic system. Geopolitik was a defensive theory against these attempts undertaken by France, Great Britain and, later, by the Soviet Union.

The Ideal of German Geopolitics was the „organic nation“, defined as a physically, morally and economically healthy people optimally realizing its given potentials. The national economy was to be safeguarded from dependence to outward interests, therefore a strive for „autarky“ was adopted. A nation which is able to produce everything it needs and consumes within their guarded boarders is less likely to be blackmailed or stifled in case of conflict.

This concept was already a strong motivation before World War I, and the National Socialists added the concept of „racial purity“ as they believed the character of a people and even its political decisions being determinated by its genetics. This also led to fatal errors, e.g. as they expected England to be a natural ally against France and Russia. They couldn’t have been further from what then really happened, as Britain (and also the U.S.) were completely undermined and subverted by a clandestine power capable of dominating a people totally, economically and mentally.

As the German people was still in demographic growth at the time the concept was developed, and Germany already had a high population density, the concept of „Lebensraum“ gained importance. Even the idea that a smaller nation which had no opportunity to gain autarky and strength on their own was to disappear and give way to its greater neighbour seems to have risen from the earliest concepts, and was only popularized by Hitler and the National Socialists as a kind of social darwinism of nations. The concept has nothing to do with genocides or exterminating peoples in favor of another one, but as there was a theory in which countries like Belgium, Luxembourg or Poland had no perspective of existing very much longer, it seems no longer a big thing to wipe them off the map deliberately and subdue their peoples to German dominion.

The Geopolitik also had little respect for existing borders because of the natural condition of Germany having no natural boundaries and therefore having been subject to foreign intrusions for centuries (e.g. the Thirty Years’ War). The only boarder of interest was the „Volksgrenze“, which was allowed to expand, also giving way to military means, if the German people expanded continually.

II. German and Western concept of economic science

In a similar way as Geopolitik, the German view on economics was integrated and holistic. It had always been a consensus, even beyond the German boarder, that totally uncontrolled markets pose a severe threat to freedom and security of peoples and even might end up in mass starvation and genocide. In an economy uncontrolled by means of „the state“ there would be players active aiming to ever greater control of the market and to ever greater profits, and the more profit a player would be able to make, the mightier and less scrupulous he would become, and as he cares not for the people’s welfare but solely his profit, the result would be a big monopoly with prices for things of basic need the average consumer is unable to pay.

German economic scientists, and even from other European countries such as France, Italy or England, were aware that, in order to reach the goal of national prosperity, there had to be established a state-controlled economy for things of basic needs, such as water, electricity, food, communication and transport.

If you are talking to economic liberalists today and come up with this fact, they will usually denounce such kinds of thoughts to be „marxist“, „socialist“ or other harsh words. They have inhalated the concept of total freedom of every economic movement, especially that of peoples and money. While they do so in oder to silence opposition even before it can develop its thoughts completely, they couldn’t be further from the truth. In fact, the concept of total market liberty is in itself much more Marxist than the traditional continental approach to economy.

Liberalism, as it dominates scientific and political debates today, comes from a completely different school of thought which has no roots in the traditional theory of national economics. Those who formulated the essential works on liberal economy had their personal experience not in the field of working or organizing work and supply for the people in a certain area but rather dealt in transregional trade or in stock markets. Therefore it is not a surprise that their own economic interest comes to dominate their theoretical building. These people made their interest in no boundaries for trade into a central economic „law“, although it is no natural law as the Law of gravity but a demand to legislation.

Today the „theory“ of free markets, which is in fact a wonderfully unproblematic way for globally operating trade concerns to gain huge amounts of profit, even dares to force the „four fundamental flows“ upon every single nation. These flows are: Money (Investitions in and Profits out), Goods (Natural resources MUST be allowed out everywhere, Products in everywhere), Information (concerning production factors) and Workforce. The last thing of these is the most dangerous of all, as a free flow of workers across the globe will root up entire peoples and force them into a soulless system of exploitation and maximization of profits. To secure these four flows, the U.S. military strategy considers to establish a fifth flow: that of „U.S. Strategical Services“, which actually means: War on every nation resisting the implementation of the flows.

Where Marx criticizes „Capitalism“, it is always this form of capitalism he describes. From the perspective of early 19. century Germany, this is untrue as there were actual means of limiting and moderating markets by imposing legislation in favor of national welfare. Marx’ main argument is: In an economy as he describes it, revolution is a necessity. But as Marx considers revolution a necessity anyway, why not let things turn out really bad for the masses first. Therefore the most unscrupulous capitalists, the international bankers and the Marxists always got along so very good for the last 150 years. Marxists, in fact, even are the bankers’ stormtroopers which do their dirty but necessary work.

The Marxist system of rule will come either way, be it via a Marxist revolution or as a creeping menace, as it is today. Neither Western liberalism nor classical Marxism will lead European and American societies out of that pincer movement. Maybe a consideration of the long-established but long-forgotten continental theories of holistic economics may provide a way out.

III. War Propaganda

Following the establishment of great nation states, great standing armies were put up, and in order to provide to these armies a sense of what they were for, states had to conduct propaganda on a greater scale. The Western powers, especially Britain, had got this point very early. Britain was the driving force in encirculating the German Reich, as it, from the No. 1 position, was afraid of any concurrent possibly rising on the Continent. In order to prepare a war against Germany propagandistically, the „Tavistock Institute on Human Relations“ was founded. Ever heard of it? And it is still in existence, for 100 years now. This institute instrumentalized defamation, infamy and lies for the cause of demonizing Germany as a people.

In order to get war bonds sold to simple British citizens for financing Britain’s war measures, the Institute set up in their propaganda posters the idea of Germany aiming at conquering the whole world and enslaving Britons. They spread the lies of German soldiers cutting off babies’ hands, raping Belgian nuns and processing fallen British soldiers into swine food – even in WWI!

There is this person named Edward Bernays. He was an American Jew, a nephew to Sigmund Freud. As the Jewish network wanted America to join forces with Britain against Germany, Bernays went to Britain and worked in the Tavistock Institute with the goal of propagandizing unto the American People until they believed war against Germany, which the U.S. didn’t border to and which never posed a direct threat to it, was a necessity. Can you think of a greater act of treason than getting your homeland into a war in favor of a foreign power, without the slightest interest for itself? After the war had ended, Bernays instrumentalized some of the propagandistic techniques for advertising and for public campaigns, which became known as Public Relations.

Germany had nothing to set against this perfidy. It tried to present the facts and figures about national education, expenditure for the armed forces and the amount of war ships built to invalidate the accusations of being „barbaric“, „war-seeking“ or „militarist“. Unfortunately, the truth about these topics is only presentable as numbers, and propaganda posters presenting numbers are not very supposed to catch peoples’ eyes and bring in money from war bonds. Only as of 1917, the Germans made their first picture-only propaganda poster, showing a soldier with the words „Helft uns siegen“ (Help us win). It raised ten times the result of the previous posters. Tragically, before Germany lost WWI militarically, it lost the war propagandistically.

And this tragedy even repeated in WWII, as Germany had drawn consequences from the propaganda disaster in WWI. Goebbels’ Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, which has subsequently been demonized as telling infamous lies, had actually just found a way of putting things into catchy headlines while the Allies’ propagandistic branches spread even more diabolic lies over the world. Unfortunately, the power which lied much less lost again and was then blamed for all sins every fighting power had committed. Just look up the name of Ilja Ehrenburg if you want to know of what kind the Allies’ war propaganda was.

IV. The situation in Germany today

Any German who still thinks the German education system will provide him with an adequate mindset is hopelessly enslaved by the Matrix. Germany today is not a free country, but the elites never stop praising their system as „the most democratic, the most free state ever in existence on German soil“. In fact, you are free to consume drugs, you are free to kill your children as long as they are yet unborn, you are free marching naked through the streets on one of those notorious CSDs – but you are NOT free to call this kind of „freedom“ decadent and menacing to our future. You are also not free to claim that the procreation of imported Islamic minorities will not only put these symptoms of decadence to an end but also will bury the small rest of our civil rights when they start struggling for the installation of Sharia Courts.

This struggle is IMO about to come, but I don’t consider it to be possibly successful. Islamists have been brought in in masses to destroy the traditional character of the country, to riot in the streets and to stoke fears among the populace, but the main purpose is to make the peoples more likely to accept a totalitarian control system, a Police state which is designed mainly by the EU. The Federal Republic is even eager to deconstruct its own statehood, its own possibility to handle the coming conflicts because the FRG-Pseudo-Elites are so eager for careers in Bruxelles and are, of course, highly confident in the European Utopia. What the average German says about this bureaucratic juggernaut doesn’t matter at all, as with modern media manipulation tools in „modern-day Democracy“, the „Souvereign“ (i.e. the average) can be forced into arbitrary states of mind.

In 2007, I took part in a demonstration in Bruxelles on September 11th in order to commemorate the victims of the New York atrocity. At that time I was still very much „critical to Islam“ and believed the lie set up by people like Ralph Giordano („Not migration is the problem, but Islam is“ – in fact it’s just the other way round). But nevertheless the event was forbidden by the Communist Bruxelles mayor (in Belgium, unlike in Germany, mayors even have the power to forbid demonstrations). Heavy armed police forces were out on the streets, with armored cars on every corner. I saw a man arrested for nothing but standing with a Crucifix and recitating verses from the Bible. I saw people getting handcuffed for flying national flags. Later I heard that there were even MdEPs (Members of European Parliament) and members of the national parliament of Belgium, of the group Vlaams Belang, heavily beaten up and taken into arrest. The Bruxelles mayor had deliberately ordered French-speaking police forces from the Walloonia to „pacify“ the situation, exploiting the inner-Belgian national conflict for his purposes. In Bruxelles, the Muslim part of the population was then already 57%, and the Communist Party led a coalition with several Islamic fractions in the town hall.

In 2008, there was a rally organized in Cologne called „Antiislamisierungskongreß“. A few hundred demonstrators were present, but the official city government organized a counter-demonstration which consisted of more than 20,000 leftists and „Gutmenschen“. The mayor of Cologne, whose son was even killed by a Turkish car driver in 2001, called the conservative demonstrators „braune Soße, die ins Klo gehört“ (brown sauce belonging into a toilet). The Police „failed“ in protecting the demonstrators, of which some were heavily beaten up. A river boat they had rented for the day was thrown at with stones so it almost sank. Finally the whole event had to be blown off. Leftist and militant „Antifa“ forces, indoctrinated school classes, Marxist priests with their also indoctrinated parishes join forces with the official administration – and in the future also with the police – against those who simply rally for Germany to keep its German character. This mess is called „Aufstand der Anständigen“ (Rise of the Righteous).
To provide oneself with a more adequate picture of his country’s very own history, one has to really be both courageous and creative. There is a newspaper which is in fact just a little bit more right-winged than the Allied-licensed press cartel (Junge Freiheit). It comes out weekly on Fridays. Sometimes when I wanted a copy, all the copies from my local kiosque were sold out by Friday 12:00 and no copies were left. This wasn’t because of a high demand for the paper but because the copies were not delivered to the kiosque – some leftist working for the delivery company had got behind what was in the package and simply annihilated it. In another press shop I asked for that newspaper and almost was kicked out by the shopkeeper, who then got a highly red head and almost wasn’t able to speak properly how much she despised of „people reading such papers“, and she „didn’t want to have to do with such papers“.

And the Junge Freiheit is long not capable of providing you the entire picture. Articles on general history dealing with the national socialist epoque are quite sparse. I most profited from reading the „Deutsche Geschichte“, a revisionist magazine which appears six times a year. The Editor reported of one case in which shopkeepers were threatened to get their shops burnt down by Leftists for just having the Deutsche Geschichte in its shop! The Editor also organizes meetings with Revisionist experts. Those meetings regularly have to be cancelled, as there are Leftists who „inform“ the hotel owners on what kind of historical views their guests have, and then the hotel clerks refuse to grant access for the referents.

This is also the way Leftists deal with unwelcome political forces such as „Die Freiheit“ (which internally is, in fact, more liberal than the CDU) or „Pro Deutschland“. These groups are simply unable to find a location to conduct their party meetings at because the location owners always get „informed“ and then act as expected. Nobody can publicly allow himself to be courageous, as reputation can – and will – be immediately destroyed. Would you want to resist a force which is willing to rip you off everything you own and even threatens to harm your home and family?

The head of the right-wing NPD, Udo Voigt, also once got kicked out of a hotel where he was spending his vacation. The hotel owner’s „explanation“ was that the other hotel guests’ right for an undisturbed stay at the hotel would outweigh the right of Mr. Voigt to stay in the hotel. Furthermore, as a private businessman he was able to decide who he wanted to have business with and with whom not. Mr. Voigt went to a court, which ruled that the hotel owner was right in doing so.
Such was the state of the German Nation in the past decade, and the actual decade is far from doing any better.